Posted on 11/17/2017 12:51:55 PM PST by Kaslin
Approaching?
LMAO
Very true
More like hostile camps than anything. Which is why many men are opting out. Once the sexbots get to a better quality and price point, it will be even more interesting.
Exactly.
Here in uber-liberal silicon valley even speaking to a female at work can result in unemployment based just on her word, actual evidence not necessary.
Heck, Apple just fired their ‘diversity officer’(a black woman) because she dared to say “white men can be diverse too”.
There is no shortage of people, sex is very easy to come by and marriage has become a lousy deal for men.
Never play a game you know has been stacked against you.
I’m one of those lucky (not convinced of it) men who want just one good woman in their life.
Don’t care for being a one nighter person either. Just doesn’t appeal to me.
Din’t mean to imply anything by that note.
What you said is true.
>>>This won’t last though. Male and female are drawn to each other. No ‘diversity is our strength’ agitprop necessary.<<<
For your consideration:
1) Women don’t act like women anymore. This from a man old enough to remember what women used to act like before the sexual revolution. In my case, my grandparents generation.
2) Women as a group believe they are entitled to a man’s attention and resources, for no particular reason. The idea that a woman should try to please her man is a rarity with young women.
3) Laws are unfavorable to men in the event things go bad. Family court is a man’s enemy.
In other words, I’m arguing that the risk vs. reward thing is worse for men at both ends of the spectrum. Yeah men are attracted to women....but increasingly they won’t want to wife them up.
If the Democrats want to solve this ‘women’ problem, they just need to craft a new Bill that makes women illegal.
>>>Oh, bloody hell. I have enough worries about America than to concern myself with some few men who have to resort to sex robots (as Rush was speaking about today in conjunction with this story) to avoid evil American women. Rush is a three time divorcee which may color his judgment on this subject.<<<
Do you think it’s possible for a man to know a woman so well that he can pick a virtuous woman who won’t cheat on him or divorce him for petty reasons?
Do you think people change over time and that the man or woman you marry today, could be vastly different in the future?
As for rush being divorced a bunch of times don’t knock him for it. He’s seen the worst of female nature up close and personal. Aren’t the rumors of this latest wife such that she’s cheating on him?
This is a blind spot for a lot of traditional and conservative people.
Cheating doesn't have as much to do with virtue as it does with some level of interest x opportunity x calculated chances of not being discovered x calculated chances of successfully being forgiven if discovered.
It doesn't begin and and with virtue. Perfectly virtuous people can run that calculation in a situation and make very poor decisions.
This is distinct from serial cheaters, or course.
>>>If the Democrats want to solve this ‘women’ problem, they just need to craft a new Bill that makes women illegal.<<<
You’re jesting of course. But here’s something that would be logical and equatable. Current law and liberal wisdom is that a child is a choice. If a mother is pregnant and wants it, it’s a baby. Otherwise it’s a fetus.
If a woman doesn’t want a baby she can: Take the morning after pill, get a surgical abortion, find some adoptive parents or even give the baby up anonymously at a fire station/police station/hospital.
If a man doesn’t want to be a father he can do nothing.
From a fairness argument you can make the argument that men should be able to opt out fatherhood like a woman can. If you want to promote tradcon values, you can make this so only single guys can opt out.
>>> Perfectly virtuous people can run that calculation in a situation and make very poor decisions. <<<
People can cheat and be perfectly virtuous?
Yep - it’s often a very poor decision based on circumstances and opportunity.
nailed it!!!
You’re discounting women’s insecurities and what they will do because of them.
We went through this crap back in the 80’s. No way could you take a secretary to lunch for a birthday, even comment that it looked better that she shaved off her beard today :-) Basically you just stopped interfacing with women, and you didn’t open the doors and show the NORMAL male to female courtesies. Finally it went away when the women got tired of it. (The secretary got hungry and wanted lunch, the other one shaved her beard with out me giving her the hint). It makes a lot of noise and a lot of newsprint ... but it is 99% BS and smoke. It’ll go away. BS becomes good fertilizer and Smoke just drifts away. It will look like racism. Then people will come to their senses and all will return to normal for another 30 years.
The more important focus is on men who want fatherhood and
...want to protect their baby from being murdered between conception and birth by the mother.
...want to keep their baby from being sold to an adoption agency by the mother.
...want to be equal parents during a marriage.
...want to be equal parents after a marriage.
Women do not drop tools for controlling and getting money from men.
>>Yep - it’s often a very poor decision based on circumstances and opportunity.
<<
That is extraordinarily cynical and flat-out wrong. I hew to my wife b/c I love her and promised to be true to her. I don’t do risk/reward to drive my actions in that case. If I had a 100% risk-free opportunity to cheat I would not avail my self.
I used to travel about 90% of the time. Many low-risk opportunities and I never even felt like taking them up on it.
I read an account of a woman who went into a restaurant, got verbally attacked by two women, and then wrote about how those women were just acting out internalized misogyny and therefor their verbal attack was men’s fault.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.