Despite [defense attorney] Levine’s argument, the judge in the case said Thursday that he did not see things the same way on the video.
...
Why didn’t the NYPost expand on that and provide more details?
The only other info I can find:
The Los Angeles Police Protective League, a labor union for officers, disputed Levine’s allegations.
“A criminal defense attorney’s selective use of body worn camera footage does not tell the entire story,” it said. “We believe the truth will be uncovered upon the completion of the internal review and we believe the officers will be vindicated.”
Why didn’t the NYPost expand on that and provide more details?
—
Because journalists have lost all touch with journalism?
Because that would require that actual journalism be practiced, a very rare thing nowadays—especially with journalists...