Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DNC, Wasserman Schultz say they were unaware of dossier payments
The Hill ^ | 10/25/17 09:10 PM EDT | Jonathan Easley

Posted on 10/25/2017 6:31:21 PM PDT by SSS Two

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: DIRTYSECRET

Don no nuffin. Din see it dindu it cant prove nuffin.


61 posted on 10/25/2017 7:52:11 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fiddlstix

62 posted on 10/25/2017 8:03:35 PM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Well, I can’t say as I blame this bunch for saying whatever they feel like saying. It’s worked in the past. Hillary can tell the biggest most blatant lies known to man, and what happens? NOTHING. She’s been breaking the law for years and she laughs all the way to the bank. Nobody has the nerve to call her on her lies when she’s sitting in an interview - they all bow down to her. She has some amazing kind of power over people.


63 posted on 10/25/2017 8:05:16 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

That was my first reaction.

What is the timeline here?


64 posted on 10/25/2017 8:07:54 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

That’s completely believable.

After all, they were pretty ignorant about what the Awans were up to, and how much they were overcharging while they violated every security precaution in the book.

XXXXXX!XXXXXXXX!XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Sarcasm, right? Because I think DWS and the libs in the swamp, if not ALL swamp dwellers, knew our secrets were being sold by the Awans. If a simple old retired nurse such as I, could figure that out as soon as I heard about the IT arrangement, I’m sure our illustrious, brilliant representatives could figure it out. They took us to be fools and rubes, and if it weren’t for Trumpism, wikileaks, and our intrepid right leaning press, we would continue to be in the dark. Thank You, LORD, for using them to expose evil.


65 posted on 10/25/2017 8:14:29 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Sometimes when I’m drying my clothing I hear a clatter in the dryer and sure enough, it’s a quarter I didn’t find in the pockets before I washed the stuff. So I can understand how the DNC could lose track of a petty six million buckaroos. Sure I can.


66 posted on 10/25/2017 8:17:20 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Generally, most of these people work in environments where $10,000 to $100,000 could be spent weekly and they don’t even see it going out. Same for money coming in from donors.

This was listed as legal fees so they might have gazed at the number of $5.6 million and just felt that it occurs regularly with lawyer cost.

The problem I see is that a small-time Democrat who comes up every four years to donate $100 to $1000 to get their guy or gal into the Presidency...does care about his donation and the way it might have been used in this case....fake fiction. You can figure that it was roughly $160,000 per page for what Fusion GPS wrote up. I would have written the same fictional stuff up for them, for a lot less (probably $200 a page would have been enough for me).


67 posted on 10/25/2017 8:36:21 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
So I can understand how the DNC could lose track of a petty six million buckaroos.

Hillary's State Department lost $6 billion... so these little things can happen from time to time.

68 posted on 10/25/2017 8:41:47 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

which is worse - that they didn’t realize, or that they had no idea $6M was gone from the Party coffers?


69 posted on 10/25/2017 8:45:35 PM PDT by blueplum ( "...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

They did not know about the dead reporter.
They did not know that CNN gave Hillary the question to the debates.
They did not know About the emails.
They did not know Anthony Weiner was a pervert.
They did not know Bill Clinton was disbarred.
They did not know about Hillary and Huma Huma.
They did not know Bill Clinton was a rapist.
They did not know nuthin.
.
.
.


70 posted on 10/25/2017 8:49:00 PM PDT by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Chief of staff: Hey Deb, I was wondering if I could use $3.5 million for a research project?

DWS: What sort of research project?

COS: Oh nothing really big, just that HRC’s lawyer knows this guy who knows this ex-spy dude, who has friends that are former KGB.

DWS: What’s in it for us?

COS: Trump’s ass in a sling.

DWS: Anyway this can come back on us?

COS: (laughing) no way, HRC and BHO have Comey and the FBI in their back pocket and after she wins no one will ever know a thing.

DWS: Silly me, what was I thinking. Go ahead and make the deal.


71 posted on 10/25/2017 8:51:53 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Maybe it was the same person that used Samantha Powers and Suan Rices’ identities to unmask Trump confidants.


72 posted on 10/25/2017 8:54:28 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Pakis, uranium, dossier, pay-to-play ... the Dem scandals are sprouting like late spring dandelions.


73 posted on 10/25/2017 9:29:02 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

seeing this creature get hers (hopefully) will be delightful.


74 posted on 10/25/2017 9:44:21 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Yeah....sure Greaseball!


75 posted on 10/26/2017 1:09:43 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

She and Warren must be vying for the biggest liar award....Hillary wins despite their efforts...;-)


76 posted on 10/26/2017 3:26:39 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

I hear the sound of Debbie’s teat caught in the wringer.


77 posted on 10/26/2017 3:57:04 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

“Current and past leaders of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) say they had no knowledge that the national party was helping to fund a dossier compiled by a British spy that contained scandalous accusations about President Trump.”

How does it feel to be the latest ‘goat’ in another Clinton-scandal, Debbie? Didn’t think it would happen to you?


78 posted on 10/26/2017 4:03:32 AM PDT by Tallguy (Twitter short-circuits common sense. Please engage your brain before tweeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
Sarcasm, right?

About 3/4 sarcasm.

For the other quarter, I'm saying that Debbie and the DNC are so dirty, and do reprehensible stuff so routinely, that they can't keep track.

If I (or you, I assume) committed some unusual act of corruption or self-dealing, it would be fairly rare, and the details would be uppermost in my (our) minds. But these guys do so much perverse crap for the party, or for themselves, that it seems plausible to me that they lose track of the details. My comment is along the lines of Shakespeare's "what a tangled web we weave/when first we practice to deceive."

79 posted on 10/26/2017 7:06:40 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (White is the new Black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Agree.


80 posted on 10/26/2017 10:39:17 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson