Posted on 10/16/2017 3:09:33 PM PDT by Olog-hai
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
Absolutely affirmative-action hire. She might fit in a traffic court .
As for controlling your emotions, its called not getting involved. Your only job is to asses the basic facts of the case and read the text & history of the WRITTEN law to apply it in the same exact way it was done when the law was written.
Law is either consistently applied in all cases or its not the rule of law but the rule of men in black robes.
A judge cannot channel emotionally or logically the judgement of congress of any period, and certainly not that of the states 220 years ago.
All they can do is read what was written, and repeat what was done.
that’s why you’re not a good pick to be a judge at all.
Sorry.
Yeah, I’m so sure....
Her only qualification is being a “Latina.”
Where is that university?
Erick Erickson
@EWErickson
Sotomayor is the most consistently hostile Justice on the Supreme Court towards religious liberty. Ginsberg comes close, but Sotomayor is more predictably hostile.
10:25 AM · Jun 4, 2018
https://mobile.twitter.com/EWErickson/status/1003643798721875968
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.