Why did the New York Times decide to take Harvey Weinstein down that is the question they had the story 5-6 years ago and everyone in Hollywood knew how Weinstein was for decades why now
Editor connected to obama
I still say harvey isnt stupid enough to do this to malia..plus she is an ugly sourpuss
Why now? The libs and media are trying to get this out way ahead of next year’s elections. They want this to become old news. Seems to be backfiring.
Many have speculated that the story had reached critical mass, and that other publications were about to run with it.
Basically, the NY Times couldn't contain it any longer, and were forced to spill the beans.
The story couldn’t be held back so they did their best to contain it and manipulate it to serve them.
Notice how they are trying to tie it to Trump.
They are reaping the harvest of the SJW’s they have sown in our nation’s colleges. The NBC management (older school) spiked the story, because - “ya know, yeah Harvey’s a perv, but he’s OUR perv and his checks always clear”. Management of the Slimes are willing to let the old guard establishment know that more than lip service needs to be paid in their public stances on harassing the po’ oppressed wymynz... This some more evidence of the civil war in the ‘rat party.
That is the big question. Why now? It is not new news.
IMO, these guys get thrown under the bus when they are no longer useful.
With Bill Cosby, they waited until he was not a big money maker. So I am wondering if Weinstein was losing influence or maybe his business/finances were heading south. ??