Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Specify How Weinstein Money Will Be Re-Donated
freebeacon ^
Posted on 10/11/2017 8:08:26 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: lacrew
” I was shocked, I was appalled”
Impossible for truth to emerge when her lips move.
21
posted on
10/11/2017 9:01:39 PM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
(Morning in America Again, again.)
To: Sub-Driver
I was a campaign promise/mention at EVERY Trump rally. MILLIONS called out for it .....
It’s time : Indict - Arrest - Prosecute - and Imprison Hillary Rodham Clinton .
GO after Obama too - no quarter , no mercy , full accountability. Remember Benghazi !
22
posted on
10/11/2017 9:29:04 PM PDT
by
LeoWindhorse
(America First !)
To: Sub-Driver
23
posted on
10/11/2017 9:35:39 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: Sub-Driver
I am sure Bill is thinking they could buy some hookers with that money.
24
posted on
10/11/2017 9:40:54 PM PDT
by
boycott
To: Sub-Driver
She will create a new foundation, The Billy Jeff SinkEmporer Foundation for Victims of Sexual Assault. Of course her horseyface daughter will be named CEO and Chelsea will be paid at least one million dollars per year.
25
posted on
10/11/2017 9:41:29 PM PDT
by
RooRoobird20
("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
To: Sub-Driver
"To charity? Stop it! Yer killin' me."
("I've thought about it.")
26
posted on
10/11/2017 9:45:51 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: Sub-Driver
Clinton charity give to charity b. Charity b gives to charity c. Charity c gives to Clinton charity and the problem is solved. However, due to public scrutiny she will just probably give it all to Planned Parent Hood and get nothing back.
Many of our supposedly charity organizations are corrupt to the insidious cores. I would suggest you give to the Salvation Army or Samaritan’s Purse. The do great work and their financial books are open for anyone that wants to look. Their overhead is far far far lower than most.
Avoid the Red Cross. They do good work but their overhead is rather large.
27
posted on
10/11/2017 9:48:26 PM PDT
by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud-man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, CONSTITUTION WORTH DYING FOR!)
To: Sub-Driver
""I give 10 percent of my income to charities every year and this will be part of that," Clinton said referring to re-donating Weinstein's donations."
ROFL. This is more perfect b.s. than even all the other politician re-donations!! All this says is that she will continue to "donate" 10% but will now say that the Weinstein money is "part of that" i.e., this doesn't cost her a penny, it's simply using a different label on part of her existing "charitable" donations. Total b.s.
28
posted on
10/11/2017 10:12:02 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(Bill, Anthony, Harvey .... how does lesbo Hillary manage to surround herself with male predators???)
To: Sub-Driver
Whaddaya wanna bet that she says that his money went to the Foundation and the Foundation no longer exists, so
29
posted on
10/11/2017 10:12:58 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: MinuteGal
I caught that too.
Sounds like the same amount of Hillary's income will be donated as last year, probably to the same places as last year.
As usual, slick and slimy. They never change.
30
posted on
10/11/2017 10:16:49 PM PDT
by
ZOOKER
(Until further notice the /s is implied...)
To: Sub-Driver
No brainer, it goes to the clinton foundation. She gets paid, and is then able to write off the donation when she files her taxes, and still able to declare she gave 10% of what she makes to charity.
31
posted on
10/11/2017 10:35:13 PM PDT
by
mikefive
(RLTW/DOL)
To: Sub-Driver
I am still waiting for the few hundred grand her brothers were supposed to have returned from selling pardons.
32
posted on
10/11/2017 10:46:44 PM PDT
by
blackdog
To: MinuteGal
This was the second time I LOL tonight (after watching “Open Secrets”). It’s too toxic to use (not that we know of all of it), so she may as well us it as a personal charity deduction. Much better than donating used underpants.
The first laugh was over Disney and the Weinstein Group denying knowledge of Harvey.
33
posted on
10/11/2017 11:02:02 PM PDT
by
kallisti
(Both soliloquized alternately and imagined they were conversing)
To: kallisti
Redux:
Hill honey, Bill’s used underpants aren’t worth that much.
34
posted on
10/11/2017 11:29:36 PM PDT
by
buffaloguy
(Bond arms Cowbot)
To: buffaloguy
Not as much as a blue dress.
35
posted on
10/11/2017 11:51:26 PM PDT
by
kallisti
(Both soliloquized alternately and imagined they were conversing)
To: Sub-Driver
To the Clinton Foundation. ... of course!!!
To: tired&retired
37
posted on
10/12/2017 1:56:08 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
(The New PTSD: PRESIDENT-Trump Stress Disorder - The LSN didnÂ’t make Trump, so they can't break him)
To: Cowboy Bob
Or why don’t they just give it all to children’s hospitals.
To: Sub-Driver
She’s going to buy herself a bunch of underwear and then donate it after being used for awhile.
39
posted on
10/12/2017 3:26:21 AM PDT
by
MomwithHope
(Law and Order and that includes Natural.)
To: Sub-Driver
"I give 10 percent of my income to charities every year and this will be part of that," Clinton said referring to re-donating Weinstein's donations. She's gonna give what she usually gives and "claim" that part of that is money from Whinestein? That's scummy/
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson