Posted on 09/16/2017 7:12:01 PM PDT by Nextrush
The Pentagon and US allies in Syria accused Russian jets of Saturday "impacting a location known to the Russians to contain (US-backed) Syrian Democratic Forces and coalition advisors" east of the Euphrates River in Syria's Deir El Zour province. The Kremlin denied the allegation.
"Several SDF fighters were wounded" the statement added. None of the advisers were injured.
But Russia's military spokesman denied Moscow targeted the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), an alliance of Arab and Kurdish fighters supported by Washington. "This is not possible. Why would we bomb them?" military spokesman Igor Konashenkov said......
(Excerpt) Read more at debka.com ...
DEBKAfile is saying the Syrian government and allied forces crossed the Euphrates River in the area as this attack was alleged to have occurred.
Kurds also in this force attacked. The Kurdish independence referendum is stirring up the region with Iran and Turkey among opponents.
Russia is denying any attack occurred.
If there is a correct or just side in this war, someone please point it out to me.
If there is a correct or just side in this war, someone please point it out to me.
>If there is a correct or just side in this war, someone please point it out to me.
The Syrian goverment. They protect Christians.
The entire Middle East can fall into a sinkhole for all I care.
Armageddon is supposed to occur in Syria I’ve been told.
Is there really a “good side” or a “bad side” in that contest either?
God is good, humanity has flaws.
The full story of Syria’s Civil War and all its players would tell us about what “sinners” do, but I doubt if they really want to honestly tell us what they did.
Those who tried to overthrow Assad fueled jihadists who spawned into the Islamic State and all that it spawned including numerous terrorist attacks like the one in London the other day.
great post
Trump
was correct
Your post worth saying twice. I’m fed up with this ME BS. This is all an unknown that costs America, and we get nothing while being told by our “leaders” we don’t have the money for our border security and wall.
Assad is better for ME stability than any of these rebel anarchist groups. Does anyone have a clue what or who these groups actually represent? These rebel groups are creating civil war in Syria, just as would a foreign country (or a Soros entity) if it started feeding arms to Antifa, intentionally to turn us into civil war. It isn’t that far fetched..
fine. let’s splatter a few dozen of their unreliable, whacked out semi-cooperative muslim “allies”, and call it a day.
everyone wins!
we should give the losing side weapons and money until they are clearly winning, then switch sides.
repeat as necessary.
I don’t care. Russia can bomb them all to hell.
The only correct side is the side not butchering innocents. That would be Russia and Syria.
huh?
Putin has successfully transformed Syria into a client state with Russian navy access to the Mediterranean.
Is Syria worth getting into a war with the Russians? Not in my mind it isn’t.
Syria was that already. Russia got involved to preserve this situation.
In Syria? We have no right to be in Syria, and should not be supporting troops within the country opposed to the Assad government.
>Putin has successfully transformed Syria into a client state with Russian navy access to the Mediterranean.
Syria’s been a Russian client state since the 50s. Not sure why you’re worried about ancient history.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.