Posted on 09/12/2017 3:01:35 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
Why should only a few counties be affected?
If an insurance company wants to sell policies in your state, they should have to cover all counties. However, for some people, I could see how there might not be a hospital or other medical facility nearby where they could use their insurance with a doctor that’s in the plan.
True statement. Just wondering whats happened since now that we have John "I was against the bill before I was for it" McCain and the other liars.
The plan is working just the way the Demoncrats wanted it to work. Now there is no option but single-payer, government run health care. With any luck, we will soon all be subjected to Veteran’s Administration-type care.
The Dems controlled both the House and Senate when Obamacare was passed. Not a single Republican voted in favor. Also, there may not have been the votes in the House so the Speaker of The House, Pelosi, "deemed" the bill to pass during reconciliation. There was no real vote.
lol
deductible of 3000000000000 dollars and a monthly payment of 30000 dollars :)
No Republicans signed 0bamacare.
But I agree with you that our current Congress IS a waste of our time and dollars. We gave them the House, the Senate and now the Presidency.
And all they did for 8 years was yap about their IMMEDIATE plans to repeal and replace 0bamacare!
I don’t want it replaced. I want it repealed and I want a Free Market solution.
I am so glad I’m retired and no longer have to worry about my employees and their healthcare. We changed carriers 3 times in 3 years due to 0bamacare, and had to cut hours for everyone, and take away our Flex Plan for our employees because 0bamacare made it illegal.
But, I’ve sung this song before, and no one listens, LOL!
I’ll believe it when I SEE it repealed.
Yeah, but notice that the article is blaming Trump. Expect the media to keep beating this fake news drum.
I’ll leave it to the lawyers to figure the angles, but it seems to me that there is a compelling equal protection constitutional challenge to be made here. Obamacare has collapsed. Congress is incapable of fixing it, not because there aren’t solutions but because there are insufficient votes for any one of them. The upshot is that we now have a law that prohibits a geographically defined group of people from purchasing any health insurance at all, because there is no one willing to issue a policy on the terms dictated by the law. Surely no one would argue that Congress could impose a law that prohibited people from spending their own money to purchase food, clothing, housing, electric power, diet coke or any other basic necessity of life. A law that had this effect on any particular, arbitrarily victimized group of people would be a denial of equal protection. That’s the gist. Clearly the Roberts court erred when it allowed Obamacare to be implemented. Time has revealed the law to be a failure and Congress to be incapable of a remedy. The law should be a nullity. This is an opportunity for the Court to correct its disastrous error.
0bamaCare, working as planned!
“Expect the media to keep beating this fake news drum.”
Oh, that’s a given! However - it’s GOT to wear thin at some point in time. I mean, really:
‘President Trump is responsible for my stubbed toe, my hangnail, a pimple on my chin AND my lost car keys!!’
THAT is how the Enemy Media sounds to me, and IS sounding to tens of millions of others.
President Trump got MORE votes than any OTHER Republican candidate in ANY Presidential Race in America’s history!
We, ‘Deplorables’ are 100% Fed Up.
But there are so many on the left who never tire of hearing all of the lies they tell about the president.
Well, it DOES sell Advertising Time.
The Capitalist in me totally understands that. ;)
However, LefTards HATE Capitalism, yet use it to their advantage at every turn. Go figure!
Excellent point. All these challenges to Trump repeal of DACA yet no right of center group can muster a challenge to an obviously defective law.
In this case, actual concrete harm is being done to identifiable people by refusing them any relief from a law that has clearly failed, at least in their jurisdiction. HHS should also take the initiative to extend the broadest possible waiver to people in this situation so that they can seek market remedies.
According to the article, no. The claim is the uncertainty of federal payments for additional cost sharing on the exchange is destabilizing all insurance in those counties.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.