Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump gives the Pentagon six months to kick THOUSANDS of transgender service people out...
The Daily Mail ^ | 24 August 2017 | James Wilkinson

Posted on 08/24/2017 7:48:23 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: marron

It’s not backing down, it’s finding a viable path thru a legal minefield. Without such phrasing, the whole category gets to stay as a matter of “discrimination” and the policy fails. With such phrasing, objective realities are sensibly applied and the consequences accepted as valid reality.


41 posted on 08/24/2017 8:08:46 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grania

Agree. But I believe strongly that President Trump is definitely being advised behind the scenes.


42 posted on 08/24/2017 8:09:11 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

Probably fast-tracked for promotions


43 posted on 08/24/2017 8:09:36 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

There is a strong possibility that the involvement of the courts is desired.

A SCOTUS ruling that there is no such thing as a transgender special right and if undeployable they are not qualified to serve puts the issue to rest.


44 posted on 08/24/2017 8:09:53 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; hanamizu
It’s not backing down, it’s finding a viable path thru a legal minefield.

You guys are right. Thank you.

45 posted on 08/24/2017 8:09:53 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
This will never get to the courts for the purpose of abolishing the rules set by the CIC.

It'll be some discrimination cr** and since the offended party caused the problem and lost nothing, it will go no where.

46 posted on 08/24/2017 8:10:16 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

When I was in, any condition that made you permanently non-deployable was grounds for discharge. With manning levels at their all-time lowest in the history of the AF this is a critical issue. If you happen to be in a small career field and there are only a few of you on base and one is non-deployable, the other one or two people have to deploy more often. Instead of being away from home for 6 months a year, you end up being gone for 9 months a year. It’s not fair to the rest of the force to have a special class of people who don’t have to follow the same rules.


47 posted on 08/24/2017 8:11:12 AM PDT by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
THOUSANDS of transgender service people

Come on, lets get the real number. Thinking not thousands.

48 posted on 08/24/2017 8:11:14 AM PDT by super7man (Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Thousands? Really? We have sunk that low as a Nation that we have Thousands of people serving in the military that do not know if they are male or female? God help us!


49 posted on 08/24/2017 8:11:24 AM PDT by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

“Nothing like reading the painful remorse of “men “discovering the reality of a lifetime of mangina stretching”

Somewhat comparable: “My Period and Me: A Trans Guy’s Guide to Menstruation”.


50 posted on 08/24/2017 8:11:43 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

I would question ‘thousands’ as well. You might be up into the 400 to 500 level if you gaze across the entire military. If this were a order on gays only...it’d be a higher number like they suggest, but it’s not.


51 posted on 08/24/2017 8:12:36 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Ping.


52 posted on 08/24/2017 8:15:08 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow
Thousands?? I’ve been in DoD for nearly 40 years and have only seen one...and he was a Civilian.

You can bet that with Obama as CIC for the past 8 years, they have been giving the highest priority to recruiting trannies, gays, insane people, Jihadists and anyone else they could dredge up. Degrading our military was a strategic priority for Obama from the start.

Its going to take some work to get things back to where they should be.

53 posted on 08/24/2017 8:15:08 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

Yes! It is actually causing more stress on those who are deployable!


54 posted on 08/24/2017 8:15:14 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: super7man

Absolutely not “thousands”. That’s a media lie. It’s in the hundreds.


55 posted on 08/24/2017 8:15:58 AM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

I would like an actual count of the number of ‘transgender’ people.

I bet it is actually very few, not “thousands”.


56 posted on 08/24/2017 8:18:20 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bert

Doesn’t “Commander-In-Chief” neutralize any court ruling on military matters?


57 posted on 08/24/2017 8:19:12 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: thinden

They’re all on hormone therapy and junk and that is why they are nondeployable.


58 posted on 08/24/2017 8:21:55 AM PDT by ichabod1 (Smoke does not mean fire when someone threw a smoke grenade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: daler

-—Doesn’t “Commander-In-Chief” neutralize any court ruling on military matters?-—

Hmmm.... I really don’t know

But I’m certain that such a rule would not stop a communist judge from issuing an injunction


59 posted on 08/24/2017 8:23:41 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

Thousands?? are there really that many in there??

...

My guess is they flocked to the military for free treatment, not to serve.


60 posted on 08/24/2017 8:24:11 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson