Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here’s how to take out North Korea’s nukes
The New York Post, America's oldest continuously circulating newspaper ^ | August 9, 2017 | Ralph Peters

Posted on 08/10/2017 11:24:24 AM PDT by TBP

The first step should begin immediately, well in advance and without firing a shot. All military family members, all Department of Defense civilian employees and all nonessential contractors should be evacuated from South Korea. Want to get North Korea’s attention? That single act would serve as a graver warning of our readiness than any amount of sanctions or saber-rattling.

Initially, we’d launch a surprise air and naval campaign, with ground forces deployed only in defense of South Korea. Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile-development facilities and arsenals wouldn’t be in the initial target set. First, we’d have to overwhelm and destroy North Korea’s air defenses, while simultaneously degrading Pyongyang’s military command, control and communications to cripple any response.

Then, rapidly, we’d go for the missile and nuke infrastructure. And here’s where we’d have to show our will to win. Wrecking bunkered sites isn’t enough. Research, development and production facilities can be rebuilt.

We’d need to strike, without warning, the dormitory facilities and housing areas for the scientists, designers, technicians, skilled workers and military cadres involved in North Korea’s nuclear-weapons and missile programs. If we’re unwilling to do that, we’d merely be buying ourselves a minor delay at extravagant cost.

And then we need to be prepared to counter any North Korean conventional blows against South Korea.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nknukes; nkoutofcontrol; northkorea; peters; ralphpeters; trump; trumpasia; trumpnk; usnkstratagy; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Colonel Peters makes sense here, but he's doubtful that we have the will.
1 posted on 08/10/2017 11:24:24 AM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

This video has the best analysis I’ve seen so far of how a US-North Korea war would play out:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WyrYBrOC1o


2 posted on 08/10/2017 11:29:23 AM PDT by TroutGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“And then we need to be prepared to counter any North Korean conventional blows against South Korea.”

With what? Giant Spaulding catchers mits for the artillery shells coming in like rain in a hurricane? With all due respect, Peters has not been right about anything to crow about for the last few years. I have gotten to the point where I treat his commentary just as credible as Obama.


3 posted on 08/10/2017 11:30:05 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"Initially, we’d launch a surprise air and naval campaign, with ground forces deployed only in defense of South Korea. Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile-development facilities and arsenals wouldn’t be in the initial target set. "

Someone needs to go back to their xbox and stop writing. You can't let a single warhead excape, or it could potentially be smuggled to terrorists... or even used on Seoul. The first and primary mission objective should be locating and appropriating or destroying ALL of them. You cannot do this from the air. You can't track them with remote sensing unless they have poor shielding and leak signature EMR
4 posted on 08/10/2017 11:30:43 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I thought the smart people from Obama administration say we should just leave them alone seeing they have nuclear weapons and all.


5 posted on 08/10/2017 11:32:07 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

A ground game would be inevitable if any real action were to take place. Warheads can be smuggled anywhere and hidden in small bunkers, or someone’s basement, or under a woodpile next to a hen house. It is ridiculous to sit around and think you can just bomb them with aircraft and cruise missiles like it’s some video game


6 posted on 08/10/2017 11:33:46 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Seoul can’t be protected, but by all indications (e.g. Lyndsey Graham’s statements after discussing it with Trump) Trump knows he was elected to advance US interests, not South Korean.

I expect Trump to attack with heavy bombers from Guam and US ships in international waters. We don’t need South Korea’s permission to protect our homeland from NK nukes.


7 posted on 08/10/2017 11:35:08 AM PDT by TroutGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

We don’t need an insane War, just tell China,’Replace you pet Pit Bull with a Poodle or within a month none of your ships filled with merchandise enter America”.


8 posted on 08/10/2017 11:35:48 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I wonder how our research into non-nuclear tactical EMP devices is going? That would seem to be a good thing to start with. Presumably all that artillery pointed as Seoul has some electrical components that could be knocked out before they could do any damage.


9 posted on 08/10/2017 11:39:10 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Curtis LeMay strategy. It was sensible back in the 1950s, and it is still sensible today.


10 posted on 08/10/2017 11:39:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutGuy

No aspersions on Col. Peters, unless I have my information wrong, NK has 1970’s missiles that can only be launched without precision as to target. Moreover, they can’t carry a nuke yet. So how could they hit Guam? Let’s just cooperate with South Korea’s plan to deal with NK. If I am wrong on this, please correct.


11 posted on 08/10/2017 11:40:19 AM PDT by WayneLusvardi (It's more complex than it might seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Peter’s idea won’t work at the speed needed to prevent the Norks from responding.

Any first strike should include nuclear and should target all biological, chemical, and nuclear sites.

That’s the only to possibly prevent a nuclear biological response


12 posted on 08/10/2017 11:40:58 AM PDT by xzins ( Support the Freepathon! Every donation is important.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heights

Good response. I was thinking of a sky writer over NK with message in Korean “Shape up or Trump will blacken the sun in 2 weeks.”


13 posted on 08/10/2017 11:41:08 AM PDT by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TBP

This Peters clown hates President Trump and endorsed the Hildebeast. Eff him.


14 posted on 08/10/2017 11:41:40 AM PDT by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutGuy

There exists weapons in our arsenal that is very rarely spoken about, if ever. Total defense of Seoul, not going to happen but unconstrained artillery will not happen as predicted either. All that is required is for the CIC to have the will to use them but in doing so, the world will awaken to a new terrible reality as they did after the first reports from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


15 posted on 08/10/2017 11:42:43 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi

“Let’s just cooperate with South Korea’s plan to deal with NK.”

Appeasement? Burying our head in the sand? We’ve tried that plan for the last 20 years.

The hard truth is that US and South Korean interests now diverge with North Korea. South Korea doesn’t really care if NK has ICBMs that can reach the US, but we sure as hell do.


16 posted on 08/10/2017 11:42:56 AM PDT by TroutGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TroutGuy

That video completely ignores the entry of China into the theater.


17 posted on 08/10/2017 11:47:43 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Ralph Peters has a clue about military operations but, like most military types, none about preparing American public opinion for war. Battlespace preparation for them is confined to the battle area, and has nothing to do with public support for war.

Then French Premier Clemanceau said around 1917-1918 that "War is too important to be left to generals".

18 posted on 08/10/2017 11:53:23 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

The major military impediments to the South Korean Army marching to the Yalu are that the roads in North Korea would be clogged by civilian refugees trying to get the hell out of North Korea, and ROKA logistics capabilities in the many mountains where all the bridges would be down.


19 posted on 08/10/2017 11:56:51 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TBP
all nonessential contractors should be evacuated from South Korea. Want to get North Korea’s attention? That single act would serve as a graver warning of our readiness than any amount of sanctions or saber-rattling.

And South Korea, after being abandoned by us, would never trust us again. Nor would any other ally.

Seriously, just pack up and leave right before starting a war that is going to get millions of South Koreans killed? And this guy was a general?

And then we need to be prepared to counter any North Korean conventional blows against South Korea.

Might be a good idea to be prepared to counter a North Korean nuclear attack on South Korea and Japan - or do you think the North Koreans are not capable of developing a second strike capability? It's a big country and they've had decades to dig deep holes. Are you sure you got every single nuke? Going to bet the lives of every man, woman and child in Tokyo on that?

I also didn't see anything in General Peter's plan about countering biological weapons. You know - the poor man's nukes. Much easier to make and to deliver than nuclear weapons and just as effective at killing people. War mongers like General Peters are so eager to get the killing started they sometimes forget to look at things from the other side of the fence... hmmmm.... $2 billion for a couple of ICBMs with nuclear warheads or $20 million for enough weaponized anthrax to take out Los Angeles... and for another couple of mill the same lab could crankout some smallpox viri to hold back to use on any invading US troops. But hey,,let's just go with General Peter's plan and hope North Korea is stupid enough to play the part of his patsy for him.
20 posted on 08/10/2017 12:00:54 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson