Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Congressional Map Has A Record-Setting Bias Against Democrats
FiveThirtyEight ^ | August 7, 2017 | By David Wasserman

Posted on 08/07/2017 1:52:47 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

When Democrats think about their party’s problems on the political map, they tend to think of President Trump’s ability to win the White House despite losing the popular vote and Republicans’ potent efforts to gerrymander congressional districts. But their problems extend beyond the Electoral College and the House: The Senate hasn’t had such a strong pro-GOP bias since the ratification of direct Senate elections in 1913.

Even if Democrats were to win every single 2018 House and Senate race for seats representing places that Hillary Clinton won or that Trump won by less than 3 percentage points — a pretty good midterm by historical standards — they could still fall short of the House majority and lose five Senate seats.

This is partly attributable to the nature of House districts: GOP gerrymandering and Democratic voters’ clustering in urban districts has moved the median House seat well to the right of the nation. Part of it is bad timing. Democrats have been cursed by a terrible Senate map in 2018: They must defend 25 of their 48 seats1 while Republicans must defend just eight of their 52.

But there’s a larger, long-term trend at work too — one that should alarm Democrats preoccupied with the future of Congress and the Supreme Court.

(Excerpt) Read more at fivethirtyeight.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2018issues; 2018midterms; democrats; election2018; election2020; socialists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2017 1:52:47 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

No doubt because white Americans are racist.


2 posted on 08/07/2017 1:56:44 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

A poor workman blames his tools.


3 posted on 08/07/2017 1:57:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Dang Russians.


4 posted on 08/07/2017 1:58:12 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

As if Democrats never used gerrymandering.


5 posted on 08/07/2017 1:58:57 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“The Senate hasn’t had such a strong pro-GOP bias since the ratification of direct Senate elections in 1913.”

Speaking of tools... they are wasting this advantage like a bunch of idiots!


6 posted on 08/07/2017 1:59:44 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Senate hasn’t had such a strong pro-GOP bias since the ratification of direct Senate elections in 1913.

You would never know that based on results.

7 posted on 08/07/2017 1:59:48 PM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The bias is strong with this one. Gerrymandering has always been done more skillfully by Democrats than Republicans.


8 posted on 08/07/2017 2:00:26 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The excuses for dem midterm losses keep coming...

and it’s still 2017!!


9 posted on 08/07/2017 2:00:35 PM PDT by Conserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Like it or not, "Gerrymandering" is the result of democracy. The Democrats went hard left in 2009 and 2010 and the result was a backlash by the voters that resulted in the GOP sweeping statehouses and governorships, allowing them to re-draw district lines for the next decade. If the Dems had governed as centrists, the sweep never would have happened. The Dems have only themselves to blame.

Now the Dems are trying to get the Supreme Court to rule that district lines that give one party an advantage are unconstitutional. No. Those lines are the result of free and fair elections. Just another example where the Dems lose at the ballot box and then try to get the results overturned in court.
10 posted on 08/07/2017 2:01:32 PM PDT by pstwwl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is partly attributable to the nature of House districts: GOP gerrymandering and Democratic voters’ clustering in urban districts has moved the median House seat well to the right of the nation.

B.S.!

More FAKE NEWS!

More propaganda from the Marxist news outlets of this country.
11 posted on 08/07/2017 2:03:07 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Republican gerrymandering? HA! Has this author ever seen Maryland’s gerrymandered congressional district map? It looks like cooked spaghetti tossed onto a plate except the districts are very carefully computer generated to give Dems a 7 to one advantage, far more than the admittedly blue majority.


12 posted on 08/07/2017 2:04:24 PM PDT by Freee-dame (Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What he declines to see, or refuses to, is that gerrymandering by the Democrats when they were in power in state legislatures contributed to their own demise.

They created and ‘set aside’ ‘minority districts’ to insure a black representative would be elected from their state, no matter what. What this did in the unintended consequence category of being too clever by half is, rob adjacent districts of democrat voters that they would have had in marginal districts to win.

Then, when the GOP got control of the legislatures, they decided to keep the minority districts intact, thus insuring all the democrats were herded into one bloc and have minimal effect on other districts.........................


13 posted on 08/07/2017 2:05:29 PM PDT by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

Obviously gerrymandering is what they want.


14 posted on 08/07/2017 2:06:06 PM PDT by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Congressional district gerrymandering has been done by judges, directly or indirectly, for decades, with the express purpose of maximizing representation of minorities.

Ensuring automatic wins for Democrats of course was going to lead to other districts with minimal minorities. What did they think would happen?


15 posted on 08/07/2017 2:07:00 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

That’s what happens when you give Al Green and Maxine Waters the spotlight to stake-out the extreme Left positions on Trump


16 posted on 08/07/2017 2:10:02 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Link below is to Luis Gutiérrez’ 4th Congressional Map — the mother of all gerrymandered districts to get the (illegal) latino vote.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/IL/4


17 posted on 08/07/2017 2:11:42 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The GOP will also be helped for a generation all of the state representatives and state senators they have as a “farm team” for federal and statewide offices. It is similar to what the Democrats had after 1974.


18 posted on 08/07/2017 2:13:00 PM PDT by tellw (ed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Republican_Party

From the link(under resurgence)...

In the 90s, Georgia Republicans gained a majority in the congressional delegation after a redistricting plan adopted by the General Assembly Democrats backfired.

I remember this like it was yesterday!!! One district resembled a pencil. People were pissed off.

At the time, I was a very young Republican, and
dem representative Robert Brown(Macon) told us(thru the media) to just suck it up.

Well, we sucked it up alright and then came out in droves to vote against them.


19 posted on 08/07/2017 2:27:15 PM PDT by Conserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Corrine Brown’s old district was two blocks wide in Orange Park - made so as to connect downtown Jax with Ocala. It’s now gone and so is she.


20 posted on 08/07/2017 2:29:24 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson