I encourage people to watch at least a few minutes of it...while you are away at work all day, there is an entire subculture of couch sitters who have this and other shows as their reality.
Posted on 07/24/2017 4:18:53 AM PDT by servo1969
In 2003, a child support court in Texas ruled that Gabriel Cornejo, 45, had to pay child support to his ex-girlfriend who had recently given birth because she vowed that there was no way he wasn’t the rightful dad.
Cornejo, who is currently raising three children of his own and two nephews, claimed that he was not made aware of this and only found out about the child support payments last year when a deputy served him court papers claiming that the state of Texas lists him as having another child. He soon met the minor for the first and only time – describing her as a “wonderful girl” – but after taking a DNA test, learned she was not his after all.
Only Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend and the state still want the $65,000 in back payments.
----
Texas’ family code, chapter 161, states that even if one is not the biological father, they still owe support payments that accrued before the paternity test proves otherwise. In Cornejo’s case, that amounts to some $65,000.
His ex-girlfriend’s attorney, Carel Stith, claimed that money was taken out of Cornejo's paycheck several years ago and he didn’t contest it, and that in itself can satisfy a court argument that he should have handled the matter long ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
If the child is killed by an illegal, he doesn’t have to pay?
That's like saying a victim of identity theft who does not challenge money being withdrawn from his account (bank or social security) "consents" to it.
When confronted with what was happening, he took a DNA test. Isn't that contesting it?
How about putting that btch to jail
and slavery and give the child away to adopting parents
Gee that’s nice, go on a date and the statists demand you pay $65,000
Very strange law about having to pay the money doled out to the deadbeat mother before the paternity test. It should be retroactive and if the non-father paid any money for a child that didn’t belong to him; the state should pay him back with interest if they are saying he owes interest now.
The lesson for men here is; when going on a date, a man should keep his zipper zipped up. If people want to be treated like people, they should stop acting like animals. Some human behavior needs to be preserved for marriage only.
That’s not a “lesson” the state should be teaching, nor is it law they should be inventing.
There really is no more excuse for this kind of nonsense.
Make every claim filed for child support contingent on a DNA test. No match, no liability, no pay.
And some people still have no idea why men are avoiding relationships more and more?
Or maybe instead of blaming the man, you could try this thing like teaching the WOMAN to not fricking LIE.
But that’s hard and may hurt her feelings....so blame the guy for not being in a marriage where she could on top of lying about the paternity, she could then divorce him and take half of his cash on top of that!
I wonder if he represents himself in court? He seems like the no brain type to do it
“Texas’ family code, chapter 161, states that even if one is not the biological father, they still owe support payments that accrued before the paternity test proves otherwise.”
That is pure evil; and totally unjustified.
That isn’t always the case. You can be sued for child support without having relations with the mother. If she puts your name down you have to contest it immediately. Happened to a buddy of mine. He was suspect number 4.
These laws never would have been passed without men's support.
Key point, the $$$ goes to the mother NOT the child.
She can spend it on whatever she wants, even her boyfriend.
I encourage people to watch at least a few minutes of it...while you are away at work all day, there is an entire subculture of couch sitters who have this and other shows as their reality.
Problem here is that the courts produced zero justice while giving this man motive to murder everyone involved in stealing from him.
The family court system “objectifies” men as mere wallets to be emptied at the point of a gun.
Oh well, them's the rules of the game in Texas, should have learned them before getting any ex-girlfriends pregnant. Hope that p***y was worth it.
“Texas’ family code, chapter 161, states that even if one is not the biological father, they still owe support payments that accrued before the paternity test proves otherwise.”
That is pure evil; and totally unjustified.”
Who is the “one”? Do they just pick some poor
schlub off the street and say you’re it?
Hasnt happened to me personally but I’ve seen close up the evil of the “child support” racket. Its all about punishing
men and letting vicious feminists get off on the suffering. Support for the child is incidental. Truly evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.