Posted on 07/21/2017 11:12:59 AM PDT by NYer
The stunning document, released by Wilton Park, an agency of the Foreign Office, also recommends that the Bible be reinterpreted “to make it compatible with LGBTI ideology.”
The Barnabas Fund, an organization that supports persecuted Christians worldwide, was surprised and more than a little worried.
“The recommendations, if implemented, would massively reverse freedom of religion across the globe,” the group said.
“Once it is accepted that any ideology can be imposed on those who hold conscientious disagreement with it, a very significant backward step has been taken both in relation to i) Freedom of Religion or Belief and ii) human rights generally.”
The Christian organization issued its own report stating “the fact that Wilton Park is an executive agency of the U.K. Foreign and Commonwealth Office” is frightening.
“As such, unless disowned by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the publication of these recommendations by Wilton Park are in effect state sponsored advocacy of imposing serious restrictions on freedom of religion around the world.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Soulforce is an advocacy organization for homosexuals. Genesis 19 describes how God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah because of their tolerance of homosexuality.
Catholic ping!
But what about the Madrassas????
( Crickets )
What would be the appropriate response to this?
Bravo? Who am I to judge?
Just think how bad it would be if Labour was in power! /sarc
Sir Thomas More was martyred for telling that wacky Henry VIII that he would not go against Catholic teaching on marriage and divorce.
Henry VIII would not take More’s advice. Now you have his state run religion and this.
Notice they won’t demand the qooran be rewritten to make it more acceptable to gays. Nooooo. They don’t want their heads chopped off.
Its no accident that this is the same government running out the clock on little Charlie Gard hoping he dies soon.
The appropriate response is the logical response. No one knows what is the origin of homosexual tendency. Condemnation of the tendency is not called for. Acceptance of the act, approval of homosexual relationships is not caped for
The advocates for indoctrination never give up. This reminds me of what Adolph Hitler did in WWII where he commissioned a group to totally rewrite the Bible to change the narrative.
Its all only going to get worse, and maybe Dreher is right and the only hope for Orthodox Christians is the “Benedict Option”.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/cardinal-muller-benedict-option/
Oy.
That is not correct.
From Romans 1:
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.
And to think I just left an otherwise very nice “church” because it started teaching that homo sex is “ok. “. What’s happening to USA, U.K.?
Homosexual tendency is not the same as homosexual acts
Get over it
No different from sex outside of marriage which includes the use of birth control within a marriage
Getting to heaven is not a mob thing. Cultural acceptance of evil doesn’t behavior make the behavior moral
Why not in mosques? Because Bacha boys?
Cuck. Go on the offensive: “Be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good.”
Ok I give up. What does the “I” stand for in LGBTI? Do I even want to know?
I’ve lost track with all these new acronyms....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.