Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Switzerland's Carbon Capture Plant Is a Giant Waste of Money(DOH!)
americanthinker.com ^ | 6/18/2017 | Spencer P. Morrison

Posted on 06/18/2017 8:03:52 AM PDT by rktman

On May 31, 2017 the world’s first commercial atmospheric carbon-capture plant opened for business in Hinwil, Switzerland.

The plant, designed and operated by a Swiss company called Climeworks, is different from existing carbon-capture facilities because it filters carbon dioxide out of the ambient atmosphere using proprietary technology, rather than from industrial exhaust, which is quite common.

Climeworks claims their facility will be able to remove 900 tons of carbon from the atmosphere every year. Furthermore, its modular design will allow it to be scaled up as the demand for carbon dioxide increases.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: co2; dopeydems; ecowankerstein; envirowhackos; fundingtheleft; greenjobs; plantsometrees
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
How silly. I have a bunch of carbon capture "plants" right here at my house. Only cost is some required dihydrogen monoxide ever other day. They may not gather 900 tons yearly but they're doing their part. Have any botanist thought of suing these assclowns who apparently attained their degrees from Dumbassistan U? SMH!
1 posted on 06/18/2017 8:03:52 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
carbon-capture facilities

I soooooo wish I had thought of that. I could get so much government grants, enough to turn me into a liberal.

2 posted on 06/18/2017 8:08:19 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hey I tip my hat to these guys. They have reductio ad absurdam down to a science.

The answer to a CO2 problem, if it even is a problem, is literally let a thousand flowers bloom :-)


3 posted on 06/18/2017 8:08:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

One word: bamboo


4 posted on 06/18/2017 8:13:06 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Hickory nut trees...


5 posted on 06/18/2017 8:16:12 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

My idea of a carbon capture facility is a landfill. Why the libs are so hot on biodegradation I don’t know. It breaks waste down into carbon dioxide and water. Why not just dump it into a landfill?


6 posted on 06/18/2017 8:17:20 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

That is brilliant Brilliant.

Call them carbon sequestration sites and the greenies will wuvv you to pieces!


7 posted on 06/18/2017 8:20:28 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

That is quite likely the stupidest thing I have heard of in a long time.

Well, I guess it provides more jobs on the back Swiss tax revenues.

Of course, if we didn’t pull out of Kyoto and Paris, chances are higher the jobs at those Swiss CO2 scrubbers would be paid for disproportionately by US tax dollars!


8 posted on 06/18/2017 8:25:03 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals are in a state of constant cognitive dissonance, which explains their mental instability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

And.....just what do they do with that removed carbon???

Put it into a landfill so that another “save the planet” green business can dig it back out and claim they saved the planet once again...and again...and again........?


9 posted on 06/18/2017 8:25:15 AM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As long as I’m not paying for this nonsense I could care less.


10 posted on 06/18/2017 8:27:59 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Someday archeologists will discover these dumpsters full of carbon “sequestered deep underground in Swiss mines” and wonder what sort of carbon based culture left them behind.

Was it used for currency?

Did they worship it?

Did they somehow use it in their war machines?

Were the carbon people keeping it hidden so the hydrogen people wouldn’t steal it?


11 posted on 06/18/2017 8:29:04 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best Long Term Prepper Tactic: Beat The Muslim Demographic Tsnami - Have Big Families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I wonder what the lower CO2 atmosphere around that thing will do to local plant life...


12 posted on 06/18/2017 8:32:35 AM PDT by polymuser (There's a yuuuge basket of deportables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think liberalism has morphed from a mental disorder to a collective psychosis.


13 posted on 06/18/2017 8:38:01 AM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Let me guess. This Rube Goldberg device is powered by electricity which requires the generation of just over 900 tons of C02...


14 posted on 06/18/2017 8:40:04 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As an actual scientist AND an engineer: I have three questions about this plant:

1. How many months of operation does this plant take to capture the carbon equal to the carbon released by the energy consumed in fabricating and constructing this plant?

2. How much carbon is released from the energy it takes to operate this plant for a year?

3. Is the carbon released by the plant’s operational energy consumption greater or less than the carbon it “captures”?

And rainbow beams, Unicorn farts and rose-colored glasses are not allowed in the calculations.


15 posted on 06/18/2017 8:41:34 AM PDT by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"The plant will capture 900 tons of CO2 per year," said Valentin Gutknecht, a business development manager at Climeworks. "The plant consists of several CO2 collectors, which are large boxes with filters inside. We blow air through these boxes for several hours, and after the filter is saturated, we heat the box up to 100 degrees [Celsius, or 212 degrees Fahrenheit] to extract the pure CO2 and regenerate the filters."

How do they heat the system? Electricity? Gas? How much CO2 is actually offset by the their sequestration system?

Fools!

16 posted on 06/18/2017 8:43:53 AM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

> Only cost is some required dihydrogen monoxide ever other day

I hope your not breathing that stuff!


17 posted on 06/18/2017 8:45:56 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters ("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
"How do they heat the system?"

Magical unicorn farts ... they can both heat things up or cool them down, depending on which one you wish for ...

18 posted on 06/18/2017 8:47:00 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Ex Scientia Tridens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Here’s a list, doesn’t mention bamboo or hickory nut... based supposedly on long-term storage of carbon (don’t get me wrong, I’m not a carbon-obsessed hoax-victim, just posting this stuff as interesting facts of botany):

Consider these reliable and versatile star-performers. The “best trees” vary by region, so look around local parks to see what’s hardy in your climate zone.

1. Yellow Poplar (or Tulip Tree), the top carbon-storer in one New York City study, works hard under rough conditions.

2. Silver Maple can trap nearly 25,000 pounds of CO2 in a 55 year period, according to the Center for Urban Forests.

3. Oak (White Oak, Willow Oak, Laurel Oak and Scarlet Oak) has adapted to thrive in many climates, provides food and shelter to wildlife.

4. Horse Chestnut grows well in cities; its domed top provides exceptional shade which offers passive cooling benefits.

5. Red Mulberry provides the added benefit of delicious seasonal fruit.

6. London Plane is an excellent choice for urban planning, very tolerant of pollution and root-cramping, resistant to cold and disease.

7. American Sweetgum has brilliant fall colors, is large and long-lived. In the north, consider American Linden instead.

8. Dogwood offers lovely seasonal flowers; this and other particularly dense trees like Black Walnut can store more carbon in a smaller tree.

9. Blue Spruce, widely introduced as an ornamental, thrives in most northern regions; in the Pacific Northwest, Douglas Fir also excels.

10. Pines (White, Red, Ponderosa and Hispaniola) are the most carbon-effective conifer; find out which is right for your zone.

http://learn.eartheasy.com/2014/01/10-carbon-storing-trees-and-how-to-plant-them/


19 posted on 06/18/2017 9:04:39 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
How do they heat the system? Electricity? Gas? How much CO2 is actually offset by the their sequestration system?

They are claiming they use waste heat from the power plant to which the filter is attached.

The unit in question is small, transportable by a flatbed truck. It looks like a demonstration prototype.

20 posted on 06/18/2017 9:11:16 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson