Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE - USS Fitzgerald involved in collision
US Navy web site ^ | 16-June-2017

Posted on 06/17/2017 3:16:48 AM PDT by topher

tory Number: NNS170616-20Release Date: 6/16/2017 4:57:00 PM

From U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs

PHILIPPINE SEA (NNS) -- USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62) was involved in a collision with a merchant vessel at approximately 2:30 a.m. local time, June 17, while operating about 56 nautical miles southwest of Yokosuka, Japan.

As of this time, there have been two patients requiring medical evacuation. One was Cmdr. Bryce Benson, Fitzgerald's commanding officer, who was transferred to U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka and is reportedly in stable condition. A second MEDEVAC is in progress. Other injured are being assessed. There are seven Sailors unaccounted for; the ship and the Japanese Coast Guard continues to search for them.

Although Fitzgerald is under her own power, USS Dewey (DDG 105) got underway this morning as well as several U.S. Navy aircraft, and will join Japanese Coast Guard and Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force helicopters, ships and aircraft to render whatever assistance may be required.

"U.S. and Japanese support from the Navy, Maritime Self Defense Force and Coast Guard are in the area to ensure that the Sailors on USS Fitzgerald have the resources they need to stabilize their ship. As more information is learned, we will be sure to share to it with the Fitzgerald families and when appropriate the public. Thank you for your well wishes and messages of concern. All of our thoughts and prayers are with the Fitzgerald crew and their families," said Adm. John Richardson, Chief of Naval Operations.

"Right now we are focused on two things: the safety of the ship and the well-being of the Sailors," said Adm. Scott Swift, commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet. "We thank our Japanese partners for their assistance."

For more information, visit www.navy.mil, www.facebook.com/usnavy, or www.twitter.com/usnavy.

For more news from U.S. Pacific Fleet, visit www.cpf.navy.mil.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burkeclass; fitzgerald; japan; usnavy; ussfitzgerald
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last
I have seen MIS-INFORMATION about this on Freerepublic. The CO is Bryce Benson, No CDR Shu.

Official Navy release of Collision helps clarify.

Additionally, if sailors went overboard because of the collision, they could could have sucked into the propellors or run over by either ship involved.

People need to pray for the sailors.

1 posted on 06/17/2017 3:16:48 AM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher

What’s normal practice, life vests on deck? Which ought to float the wearer well enough to avoid below surface equipment? May the Lord have mercy but sometimes people can be foolish.


2 posted on 06/17/2017 3:27:36 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

I wonder why the skipper was on deck at that time of the morning? Too bad. His career is certainly in jeopardy.

TC


3 posted on 06/17/2017 3:35:03 AM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Life vest are not normal unless rough seas.


4 posted on 06/17/2017 3:37:03 AM PDT by GailA (Ret. SCPO wife: suck it up Buttercups it's President Donald Trump! DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

Losing the ship’s commander to an accident — not a good idea


5 posted on 06/17/2017 3:39:19 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck
I wonder why the skipper was on deck at that time of the morning? Too bad. His career is certainly in jeopardy.

I was wondering why he was on deck also. On a submarine, he would have been called to the control room or to the bridge at the first sign of a close approach in the open ocean. I agree with you though, his career is in jeopardy - and probably (deservedly) ended.

6 posted on 06/17/2017 3:43:16 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GailA

But still, being in a shipping traffic lane? Kind of like why seat belts are worn when we drive, suitable gear on motorcycles etc. even if it wasn’t a legal requirement. The other guy might do something stupid.


7 posted on 06/17/2017 3:43:39 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: topher

If this is still the Navy I used to be in then the Navy Safety Command Center will study this accident/incident for years. Dozens of training films with catchy titles will be made and this incident will be used as an example in every seamanship class going forward. It will be scrutinized to death ad nauseum.


8 posted on 06/17/2017 3:44:36 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The only time life jackets are worn is during general quarters. Makes sense.


9 posted on 06/17/2017 3:52:54 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: topher

I’ve been out of the loop....does it look like it was the
fault of the Fitzgerald?


10 posted on 06/17/2017 3:55:31 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“If this is still the Navy I used to be in then the Navy Safety Command Center will study this accident/incident for years. Dozens of training films with catchy titles will be made and this incident will be used as an example in every seamanship class going forward. It will be scrutinized to death ad nauseum.”

Exactly, I agree 1,000% with that.


11 posted on 06/17/2017 3:56:08 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Life vests will not prevent someone in the water and close to an active propeller from being sucked under and into the props. Navy ships at speed and merchant container ships have huge wakes and so the suction is huge.

Several times saw surfaced boomer subs going slow returning in Strait of Juan de Fuca - wakes were about 4 feet high and 30 across near the boat.


12 posted on 06/17/2017 3:56:26 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

in this case “on deck” means he was on the bridge, this is where a surface ship is controlled from. Looking at the damaged bridge wing, my guess is he was there at the time of collision.


13 posted on 06/17/2017 3:57:39 AM PDT by Bull Snipe (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Nobody will dare be caught coming close to this state of affairs again.


14 posted on 06/17/2017 3:57:45 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1; Pentagon Leatherneck

I suppose the sound of the collision horn woke him up. Both ships were probably doing more than twenty knots on their planned course. Merchant ships have very few people on the bridge normally, but even the most basic navigational radar should have sounded a collision warning. Reliance on aids to navigation is no substitute for vigilance.

The situation on the Fitzgerald is a little murkier. This should never have happened. Warship have the personnel, training and procedures to make this kind of incident all but impossible. Someone was not following procedures. There was almost certainly dereliction, and for this the Captain (may he recover soon and completely) is responsible. The sailors’ lives depend on him.


15 posted on 06/17/2017 3:57:46 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Psephomancers for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

Kinda sucks to be hit in the helm


16 posted on 06/17/2017 3:59:07 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Deck personnel will also wear life jackets during special operations such as sea and anchor detail or unreps


17 posted on 06/17/2017 4:00:38 AM PDT by Bull Snipe (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pentagon Leatherneck

The CO might not have been on deck...he could gave been on his way to the bridge..
..on a stairrail....passageway....close to impact area.....a collision with a cargo ship 7-10 times larger than the Fitzgerald..is gonna rattle things...including bones


18 posted on 06/17/2017 4:00:40 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: topher

How the hell do two ships collide?


19 posted on 06/17/2017 4:01:15 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Uninjured sailors are good swimmers and a life jacket is irrelevant when thrown overboard. If a sailor receives an injury and is unconscious then he will likely die if he doesn’t have on a life vest prior to being thrown overboard. The biggest threat to a sailors life when in the drink is water temperature and hypothermia.


20 posted on 06/17/2017 4:01:48 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson