Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/08/2017 7:11:16 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SeekAndFind

GAME SET MATCH..even Looney Liberal Chrissy Tingle Up His Leg Matthews has to admit that this was a HUGE nothingburger..meanwhile, there was REAL Collusion between Loretta Lynch, Bill Clinton, and the DOJ..investigate THAT


2 posted on 06/08/2017 7:14:03 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

If you lost Chris Matthews......

Read the headlines here at the Star & Tribune. Flat out lying. http://www.startribune.com


3 posted on 06/08/2017 7:14:37 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The “Russia collusion/interference” investigation has been ongoing since July, 2016...

Either The United States of America intelligence agencies are as worthless as the Keystone Kops or...

There was absolutely NO collusion/interference...

If they could not find ANYTHING in 11 months, there is none....


4 posted on 06/08/2017 7:15:59 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

WOW! For all the hype and hoopla, even Tingles admits what a big nothing the Comey hearings turned out to be. This craptacular was more pathetic than Whorealdo revealing the “secrets” of Al Capone’s safe, and Rachel Madcow getting the goods on Pres Trump with his tax return.


6 posted on 06/08/2017 7:17:32 PM PDT by Impala64ssa (Islamophobic? NO! IslamABHORic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

But there DEFINITELY was COLLUSION between Comey & Loretta Lynch. Look up the definition of collusion & their meeting & agreement met that definition.

And, funny thing, Comey apparently didn’t write a memo to document THAT meeting.


8 posted on 06/08/2017 7:20:02 PM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I got the impression for a while they gave that argument up as they had and have nothing to show that(beyond some claims of phone calls by Trump associates) , so they moved on to the argument that firing Comey is ‘Obstruction of justice’.

No underlying crime?
They don’t care.
They say they don’t need one.

Trump firing Comey to keep him from finding and reporting Trump+Co’s hidden crimes, a lib just argued that to me today.


9 posted on 06/08/2017 7:21:20 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Message to Trump : I am not tired of winning yet. Please more winning and less whining!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Not a fan of Chris but good for him on this. It seems to me like president has won this. Smarter democrats realize this is a time and energy sink and meanwhile Trumpism is taking hold. hahah I said smarter democrats - oh vey, now whos living in fantasyland! Its time for a beer


10 posted on 06/08/2017 7:22:01 PM PDT by datricker (Build the wall. If you build it, they won't come - Field of Dreamers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Image and video hosting by TinyPic The thrill is gone.
12 posted on 06/08/2017 7:28:06 PM PDT by tumblindice ("Fight for your country." Hector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It should be quite apparent to anyone with even half a brain, that Comey’s actions and words, indicate that he himself hated Trump and was targeting Trump to find any charges to hang on him.

Why else would he not have told the world by now that, Trump was not being investigated regarding the Trump/Russia collusion scheme?

Why else would he, Comey, make sure that he kept notes regarding Trump? He wanted to, again, hit Trump with some charge of obstruction of justice, and his only problem was that it would have been a case of “he said, he said”. Otherwise, why would he keep notes about his conversations and meeting with Trump, while he didn’t do the same with Obama and Lynch and Hillary?

Why would he “leak” his memo to his buddy for further leaking to the NY Times? He was looking to get Trump charged with something, anything. Comey was being defensive because Trump didn’t trust him, and Trump had very good reason to not trust Comey; not after how Comey treated the indictable offenses by Lynch and Hillary and Bill Clinton.

Comey didn’t like Trump, and his body language and actual words, “indicted” himself, and Trump had to remove Trump. Good riddance to a phony and biased FBI “leader”.

Somebody should launch an investigation into Comey, because he has proven to be as corrupt as any person in government can get.


13 posted on 06/08/2017 7:30:52 PM PDT by adorno (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

My head hurts


16 posted on 06/08/2017 7:45:44 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“This is the end, beautiful friend. This is the end, my only friend, the end. Of Rat’s elaborate plans, the end.”

signed, Trump


18 posted on 06/08/2017 8:23:49 PM PDT by Gasshog (When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The feeling of a wet noodle working it’s way up from his pantleg back into his shorts....

Serves this schmuck right


20 posted on 06/08/2017 8:31:05 PM PDT by GraceG ("It's better to have all the Right Enemies, that it is to have all the Wrong Friends.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

fl


23 posted on 06/08/2017 10:17:01 PM PDT by maine-iac7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The man was an incompetent self-serving hack, He should never have been hired, and indeed should have been fired after the San Bernideno iphone fiasco. To say nothing of the countless security leaks and other successful terrorist attacks by terrorist his agency just happened to overlook.

Under James, the FBI became a weak and ineffective agency, who’s agents sat back in a car while a terrorist was fixing to shoot up a bunch of people in Texas. Thank God Texas Police were on the job.

Leting Clinton off for the big no-no of taking classified information, and doing government business on her own private email server where she conveniently lost in a rather difficult to execute non-recoverable way 30 thousands of those emails was just the tip of the Iceberg proving he was corrupt. Clinton and her IT staff should have faced serous charges for each of those actions, but James invented a new case of the law that he seemed only to apply to her and not the U.S. Navy officers who were simply trying to show his kid where he worked or countless other federal employees.

James Needed to go, and even democrats recognized that fact. The fact that Trump simply waited for the justice department to conclude a review giving a formal recommendation proves trump actually does care about formalities.


25 posted on 06/08/2017 10:59:39 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"The Theory Of Collusion Between Trump And Russia Came Apart Today"

But collusion between OBAMA, HILLARY, and Russia, was a definite REALITY.

______________________

Sen. D’Amato Drops Bomb: Hillary Allowed Russia to Take Ownership of US Uranium to Sell to Iran (Video at link)

Jim Hoft
Jul 3rd, 2016

Former Senator Al D’Amato (R-NY) dropped a bomb on Sunday Morning Futures this AM. D’Amato told Maria Bartiromo that Hillary allowed Russia to take ownership of US uranium so they could sell it to Iran.

Hillary made it possible for the Russians to take control of one of our huge uranium producers and allow them to own the company, export the uranium and who do they sell the uranium to? Iran!

Now if people knew that and that the foundation as a result of that got $135 million. I think people would start saying, “What?”

It’s true.
In January 2013, Pravda celebrated the Russian atomic energy agency’s purchase of the company “Uranium One” in Canada.

That same company, Uranium One, owned uranium concessions in the United States. Because uranium is a strategically important commodity, the Russians would need approval from the Obama administration, including Hillary’s State Department, before the purchase took place.

Nine shareholders in Uranium One just happened to provide more than $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation in the run-up to State Department approval.

The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. (Via Breitbart)

The New York Times reported on the crooked deal in 2015.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And then there’s this...

Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) told Greta Van Susteren the deal Hillary approved gave Putin ownership of 20 percent of US uranium and Russia sells uranium to unfriendly countries, including Iran.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/07/senator-damato-drops-bomb-hillary-allowed-russia-take-ownership-us-uranium-sell-iran-video/

______________________________________________________________

Obama allowing Iran to purchase uranium from Russia

Daniel Horowitz | January 10, 2017

Remember those side deals Obama forged with Iran that were not part of the text of the official treaty? Now we are finding out some of the details.

Yesterday, the Washington Free Beacon reported that Iranian officials confirmed they have received at least $10 billion in cash, commodities, and assets from Washington since 2013. And that is likely a conservative estimate.

But cash is not the only thing the Islamic Republic of Iran is receiving for gracing us with their willingness to sign onto our own capitulation. The AP is reporting that Russia, with the support of President Obama, is shipping Iran 116 metric tons of natural uranium.

While Iranian officials have obviously declined to disclose the use of such uranium, AP notes that this is enough to enrich weapons-grade uranium for nuclear bombs:

“Despite present restrictions on its enrichment program, however, the amount of natural uranium is significant should Iran decide to keep it in storage, considering its potential uses once some limits on Tehran’s nuclear activities start to expire in less than a decade.

David Albright, whose Institute of Science and International Security often briefs U.S. lawmakers on Iran’s nuclear program, says the shipment could be enriched to enough weapons-grade uranium for more than 10 simple nuclear bombs, “depending on the efficiency of the enrichment process and the design of the nuclear weapon.” ...”

See more at:
https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/01/obama-allowing-iran-to-purchase-uranium-from-russia-will-tillerson-reverse-course#sthash.guYPvONI.dpuf

____________________________________________________________________

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

26 posted on 06/09/2017 12:38:40 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
"The Theory Of Collusion Between Trump And Russia Came Apart Today"

But collusion between OBAMA, HILLARY, and Russia, was a definite REALITY.

______________________

Oct 2016

WikiLeaks Show How Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta Became ‘Business Partners with Vladimir Putin’

“...WikiLeaks emails provide proof that the “Clintons have a long and lucrative history of financial deals with the Russians, particularly with the Russian government.”

Schweizer explained the “deep ties” the Clintons have to Russia, specifically how in 2010 then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the sale and transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government ...”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/22/schweizer-wikileaks-show-clinton-campaign-chair-john-podesta-became-business-partners-vladimir-putin/

27 posted on 06/09/2017 12:44:36 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Who’s in Putin’s Pocket — Clinton or Trump? (Clinton Uranium RussiaGate scandal)

The New American ^ | August 3, 2016 | William F. Jasper

"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."

***********************************************

RUSSIAGATE

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission & $500,000 speaking fee (US uranium to Russia)

qura.com ^ | July 27, 2016 | Sierra Spaulding

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?

You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ..."

28 posted on 06/09/2017 12:45:11 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

John Podesta’s Payoff for Helping Hillary Give American Military Technology to Russia’s Putin

TheNewAmerican.com ^ | October, 2016 | Bob Adelmann

Posted on 1/7/2017, 10:49:57 AM by ETL

As part of just-inaugurated President Obama’s new foreign policy to improve relations between the United States and Russia, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in March 2009. Meeting in her hotel’s Salon Panorama in Geneva, she presented him with a small gift box containing a bright red button symbolizing the Obama administration’s desire to “reset” the relationship between the two governments.

Thus began an effort to transfer American technology to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s own “Silicon Valley,” called Skolkovo. In a report released in late July by the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) entitled From Russia With Money, authors Stephen Bannon and Peter Schweitzer reviewed the long sordid history of the technology transfer from companies such as Google, Intel, and Cisco of hi-tech technology with useful military applications.

The report quoted warnings from the FBI and the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth that the transfer would work against American interests. Warned the U.S. Army:

[The “reset” would serve as] a vehicle for world-wide technology transfers to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.

It was clearly a “quid pro quo” arrangement: 17 of the 28 companies involved in the technology transfer gave millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation or to Bill Clinton for giving some speeches.

When those authors, both of whom are affiliated with Breitbart News, summed up their conclusions, one question remained: “The GAI investigative report says it’s unclear how much, if any, money [John] Podesta made.” Podesta, having served the Clintons for years, first as chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and then as counselor to President Obama and finally as Hillary’s campaign chairman, deserved a payoff.

But it wasn’t clear until the latest batch of e-mails provided by WikiLeaks went public last week that Americans now know. For his efforts Podesta received thousands of shares of common and preferred stock in one of the companies involved in the transfer. The fact came to light when WikiLeaks published e-mails Podesta sent to the company ordering it to transfer his shares to a shell corporation he had created a month earlier.

The e-mails included a letter Podesta wrote to the corporate secretary of that company instructing him to retitle 33,693 shares of preferred stock to Leonidio Holdings, LLC, a corporation that Podesta (or one of his staff) created using a Corporation Service Company to hide the shares from public view.

The company that gave Podesta the stock shares, Joule Unlimited, claims to be a producer of “alternative” energy technology that will eventually be able to produce energy that will be competitive with oil priced at $50 a barrel. It was a recipient of millions of Putin’s rubles as one of the gang of companies working to transfer American technology to Russia, one of America’s enemies.

As Schweizer told the New York Post in an interview in July:

The Clintons, they get their donations and speaking fees in the millions of dollars. The Russians get access to advanced US technology. The tech companies get special access to the Russian market and workforce….

All I ask is that people look at the money. Who made the deals, who benefited from the deals?

Thanks to WikiLeaks the “people” now know the name of at least one of those who participated in the deals and how he benefited from them: John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign manager.

29 posted on 06/09/2017 12:45:58 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
__________________________________________________________

From Investor's Business Daily, Jan 2012:

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow

Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 - linchpin of our missile defense - might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."

"In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as 'non-binding' and that 'my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.'

Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.

Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we've deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.

Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy's Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.

The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the "early intercept" phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3's secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.

The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan's dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.

Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY
___________________________________________________

March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."

Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."

Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."

Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.

Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/

30 posted on 06/09/2017 12:46:41 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html

___________________________________________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

31 posted on 06/09/2017 12:47:21 AM PDT by ETL (Obama-Hillary, the REAL Russia-US scandal: details at my FR home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson