Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘It Simply Is Not A Crime For the President to Exercise His Constitutional Authority’
IBankCoin ^ | 6-8-2017 | Dr Fry

Posted on 06/08/2017 5:52:41 AM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Electric Graffiti
What is a crime is using the auspices of the FBI to overthrow a lawfully elected President of the United States. Cheered on by the state-run fake media, corrupt state, deep state, blue states, both parties, courts, and shadow gov.

Well said and bears repeating. SoI did .

21 posted on 06/08/2017 8:49:33 AM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
It’s simply not a crime for the president to exercise his constitutional authority to pardon or to direct the FBI.”

Comey doesn't want a president to exercise his constitutional authority by directing the FBI. Comey wants the FBI to be independent of the president.

So then who would the FBI director answer to? Comey admitted today that that he based his decisions about the Hillary "matter" on how the (foreign controlled) press would react. That's the answer, and it's how DC works.

22 posted on 06/08/2017 9:56:20 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’ve asked a few libs, what high crimes were committed and what evidence to you have to prove it when they talk impeachment. I usually get called a bigot and they storm off.


23 posted on 06/08/2017 9:58:38 AM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: heterosupremacist

They don’t know one thing about the real constitution and don’t care what it says. They think anything of which they don’t approve is unconstitutional and anything they like is well within the limits of the constitution. In other words they don’t really think at all, they only “feeeel”.


24 posted on 06/08/2017 10:32:01 AM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism regardless of the race of the racist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

You can impeach for anything. It’s a political act.


25 posted on 06/08/2017 12:55:39 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
You can impeach for anything. It’s a political act.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Legislators understand what that means. Trying to apply "did not like what he did" to that litmus is a slippery slope even the Democrats are shying away from.

26 posted on 06/08/2017 1:29:22 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

High misdemeanors could mean farting in public. There is literally no threshold beyond the political for the act of impeachment.


27 posted on 06/08/2017 1:33:26 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

“30 or 40 years from now, one or two liberals might entertain the thought that Donald Trump was actually a legitimate President of the United States.”

What if all of the surviving liberals are in their Mother’s basements or in Canada, will anyone pay attention to their muttering?


28 posted on 06/08/2017 4:13:30 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (120+ days without Hilliarly/Huma as POTUS! Covfefe President Trump for this great reality, each day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
High misdemeanors could mean farting in public.

No, no it couldn't.

There is literally no threshold beyond the political for the act of impeachment.

There is, it was established roughly 1388.

Impeachable Offenses

29 posted on 06/08/2017 4:48:21 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

That 1388 carries no legal weight. The constitution does not define high crimes and misdemeanors. They may look to England circa 1388 and common law, but it carries no legal weight at all. Anything that a simple majority of the house and 2/3 of the Senate agrees was wrong... works fine.

And it is not subject to Supreme court review.


30 posted on 06/08/2017 8:26:34 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson