Posted on 06/04/2017 12:08:15 PM PDT by DeweyCA
Professor Bret Weinstein, who has been at the center of the chaos unfolding at Evergreen State College, gave an interview to Joe Rogan Friday in which he describes what has been going on at the college both before and after this story became national news. Its a long interview but a compelling one. Ive transcribed some of the most interesting bits for those who dont have time to listen to all two and a half hours of it.
Many of the points Weinstein makes here have been made by conservatives many times, but the fact that he is a progressive teaching at one of the most left-wing schools in the country makes it hard to dismiss his critique as being part of a racist backlash. At least it should make it hard. But of course, the campus mob is now calling him a racist and demanding his head for saying these things. As youll see toward the end, there is no venue in this system of thought for someone who wants to defend themselves against the charge they are a racist. You are simply supposed to accept the claim as true without debate.
What follows is a vision of where the progressive campus is headed, not just at Evergreen but everywhere. Its a nightmare.
On how and why he wound up being called a racist by protesters:
Bret Weinstein: The people who have talked to me privately and expressed concerns are actually quite a diverse group, so its not as if white folks are disturbed by this and people of color are united. Its not at all like that. Part of the hidden story here is that in order to advance certain policy proposals it has to appear that the community is united behind them and that anybody that stands against them is standing against them for illegitimate reasons. So that means that the number of people who are willing to express any sort of nuance about whats taking place has to be small and they have to be dismissable. So what they did is they called me a racist. Which is ironic because Im an anti-racist. I really have gone out of my way to, first of all, study the question of why racism occurs and I believe have been pretty courageous in fighting against it wherever I run into it. So to challenge me with that particular epithet was a mistake on their part. It was a strategic mistake. And I kept trying to tell them while this was still internally being discussed in the college. I kept trying to tell them that they should really check the concept that Im a racist. They should ask. Because if they did, they would discover that they were actually way off the mark and then they would have an interesting puzzle on their hands. Then they would have to explain to themselves why they had found themselves hurling this most poisonous term at somebody who not only isnt a racist but is pretty nearly the opposite.
On the redefinition of the term racism
Weinstein: This also actually points to something pretty important and for anybody who travels this ground themselves, theyre going to discover this. Many of the terms that are being used have been redefined, but they havent been fully redefined. So one of the things that Ive seen in several places is that a term like racist has been redefined so that the bar for being a racist is so low that you couldnt possibly help but trip over it. But then, once youve tripped over it and you have accepted that you are a racist, then the stigma goes back to the original definition. So it is the dodging and weaving between the two definitions that actually does the heavy lifting.
Joe Rogan: Well theres also a really disturbing idea thats being bounced around lately that its impossible to be racist if youre anything other than white, which is ridiculous.
Weinstein: Preposterous. Anybody who looks up the actual definition of racism will discover that thats preposterous but yes that does pass in certain places as logical.
On the progressive campus bubble
Weinstein: Well, this is the most shocking thing. Im, you know, I havent been censured. I havent been suspended. Im still on the email distribution lists, so Im watching the traffic inside of my college and Im able to compare it to the huge flood of stuff that Im seeing from the outside world as they get wind of whats going on at Evergreen. The difference is a million miles. Inside of Evergreen, actually, we are descending further into madness. The faculty are blaming the fact that the campus had to be suddenly closed due to a threat from the outside yesterday on me, for having talked about this in the outside world
The intensity and the out-of-touch nature of the discussion inside the college simply reinforces the impression that something is desperately off, that what we really have is a filter bubble that is so strong that even when the world sends very clear evidence that youve missed something somewhere and its time to rethink what youve been doing, theyre not waking up.
On the complaints about the college presidents microaggressions
Weinstein: Did you see the video in which Dr. Bridges, our president, is being challenged for his hand gestures? The protesters are actually policing his hand gestures.
Rogan: No. Whats wrong with his hand gestures?
Weinstein: I dont want to caricature this because I really think its very important. As preposterous as whats going on is, I think its very important that we understand it. Its very easy to dismiss it because its so strange but its very important that we get it right. I think the complaint about the hand gestures was that they represented microaggressions if you will. I dont know for sure that that was the complaint but I cant make heads or tails of it otherwise.
Rogan: What was he doing?
Weinstein: I think he was kind of gesturing like a person
Rogan: Just trying to talk with emotion.
Weinstein: Right. So I do think theres a translation which [gestures with his arms], this can be portrayed as a microaggression in some way.
Rogan: How is this a microaggression?
Weinstein: I mean, it isnt. We should talk about whether or not microaggressions are even a good category. Lets just say the protesters had enough control over him that he gestured, they didnt like it, they told him not to and he capitulated, which he has been doing the entire time.
On responding to bullying
Rogan: Theres also the problem, the very real problem, with the mob mentality. It is a common thing with human beings when they get together in large groups and people start chanting and screaming and they feel very justified. And they always want to escalate Its a weird thing that people do but I was watching it in your videos where people are saying You should resign You need to apologize to that woman for communicating with her the way you did They want to bully you around. They want to push you around. They want to take that professor, that guy who has been allowed to be the one whos talking and distributing all the information and they want to shut you down.
Weinstein: Its flat out bullying. And what Im seeing is that almost nobody seems to know what to do about bullies, especially when theyre armed with the superweapon like the accusation that youre a racist. Nobody understands that capitulating to bullies may solve your problem in the moment but it makes the problem vastly worse over time. And so, all Ive done is apply that piece of knowledge, that when a bully challenges you not capitulating is just a prerequisite to getting anywhere. Ideally, you want the bully to pay enough of a price that they dont continue what theyre doing.
On being contacted by Yale Professor Nicholas Christakis
Rogan: Youre fighting against this current movement of ridiculous ideas thats going on through schools and we saw it with Yale. We saw it with those students screaming at Was it a professor who was trying to defend his wifes email about Halloween costumes? That maybe we should allow people to wear ridiculous Halloween costumes because thats part of the fun of Halloween. People were acting like you were saying we should by lynching people.
Weinstein: Well, so first of all, he did reach out to me and his point was what you are going through is eerily reminiscenthed watched the videos and he was just pointing out how shocking it was.
On whether or not the school actually asked white people to leave campus for a day
Weinstein: Their claim is that white people were not asked to leave campus, that there were only 200 spaces in the venue off campus and therefore this was just supposed to be for a small subset of peoplewhich is nonsense. There were only 200 spaces if you wanted to go to the particular seminars that they were holding [ ] but in any case, they are conflating the 200 spaces off campus with what was actually expected of us and it was quite clear. In fact, one of my staff colleagues put out an email I think it was last night, in which he detailed the several emails that we had seen in which the school did ask white people to leave for that day. So they are promoting falsehoods themselves designed to obscure whats going on, I think because they finally understood that the world doesnt get what they are doing.
On the intersectional left behaving like a cult
Weinstein: Several people, in fact, many people, have started to now refer to whats going on in the staff/faculty zone here as a cult. And I think, on the one hand, that could be tongue-in-cheek. On the other hand, the mechanisms at work that have people doubling down on absurdities rather than trying to get on the right side of history as quickly as possible, it is very cult like. Again, you asked me what would have to happen for us to right the ship, the second one is my faculty colleagues have to wake up to the fact that their belief structure has become bizarre and unrecognizable from any normal position.
On being accused of racism and told he should not defend himself
Weinstein: There was an instance where a faculty member accused those who were challenging any of these equity proposals as being part of a racist backlash. She was clearly talking about me because Im the most prominent person objecting.
Rogan: Is this faculty member a white person?
Weinstein: No. So anyway she says in a faculty meeting that this is a racist backlash and I said to her in front of this faculty meeting, I said, Somebody might want to check on the question of whether or not Im actually a racist because if you do check on it, you will discover Im not and if you dont this is going to blow up on you. And the chair of the faculty told me that the faculty meeting was not the place to defend myself against accusations of racism.
Rogan: Its also not the place to level the accusation.
Weinstein: But I said to her Where is the place? and then the faculty member who had made the accusations said You should not expect there to be a venue in which to defend yourself. You should just get used to these accusations.
On the search of his emails by the professor who accused him of racism
Rogan: So what does this person [who made the allegation of racism against Weinstein] teach?
Weinstein: They teach media.
Rogan: How ironic.
Weinstein: Right. They teach media. They are currently running a program where shes teaching students to make documentaries and one of the students in the program filed a public records request. Since we are a public college you can request the emails of faculty and staff if you want them. And so she had a student file a public records request for my email to make a documentary in her program. So youve got one faculty member searching another faculty members email through a student looking for evidence of I dont know what.
Rogan: Evidence of racism.
Weinstein: Well, presumably.
Conclusion
Ive only transcribed a fraction of the entire interview but, hopefully, its enough to give you a picture of what is taking place behind the scenes at Evergreen. This is a college that is beginning to take on some behavior that seems cult-like, but which is also becoming dangerous. As Rogan points out at one point, you have to wonder what the students were going to do to Professor Weinstein if they had found him while searching cars last week. Would they have hauled him out? Surrounded him and not allowed him to leave? The protesters complain they are being unfairly tarred as violent but while they may not be throwing punches, they are up for intimidation and humiliation. The real question is what happens when someone finally tells them no.
Always amusing to watch a lib getting mugged by reality - especially when it’s happening in slow motion, as it is in Weinstein’s case.
The guy has made some progress but he still has a long way to go to full sanity. He’s still trying to find ways to justify their demented behavior.
What happened in evergreen is liberal vs liberal. For decades, they doctrines a bunch of liberal bs. They practice them by admitting students not based on academic merit but on some political correctness. Now they reaping what they sow
Cut their funding let the leftist students run the college.
Offer other students that are sane a transfer and pair 2 years of tuition at any other college with the fund they yank from evergreen.
See how far the G_D DAMNED SJW crispy critters get.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrmUkq0jXYA
It’s all ingrained in our pop culture now. I had the misfortune of watching Saturday Night Live last week and 80% of the skits had something to do with race. Of course their sanctimonious moral superiority ALLOWS them to say whatever they want. I have never see America so in trouble.
“Racism” is a 20th century neologism with no fixed meaning.
And this poor fool is “racist” by any reasonable definition.
“Hey. Hey, ho, ho, Western Civ has got to go”
Well, after 30 years under attack Western Civ is almost gone.
Unfortunately, Western Civilization is the only real civilization the world has ever known
We are now descending into irrational, illogical and violent tribalism
It is Marxist critical theory that has been injected into all curricula, since 1965 or earlier-—to literally, destroy the minds of our children and brainwash them, and destroy the Christian worldview, so that emotions will always rule Reason.
The Age of Reason (Christianity) has to destroy virtue formation in children and normalize warped, versions of history and lies, etc., so they can control the emotions for life of the children, and trigger “group-think” mob actions like we saw with the Brownshirts. The whole Prussian school system is a brainwashing tool put in by the sodomite Marxists in the 1800s to get total control over America—a 100 year plan.
It is working. Look at the dumb, ignorant, immoral youth that are being pumped out of all of the universities. Without wisdom, knowledge and virtue, civil society will collapse. The Marxists knew this and that was their plan-—destroy and control the minds of the masses (Hollywood run by sodomites to destroy virtue and warp desires and create envy, etc) and the school curricula which erased all Classical Christian curricula by 1950s so they could flip the worldview of little children-—into evil, corrupt non-thinking masses.
Youtuber Sargon of Akkad is a liberal, British atheist, and he was calling social justice a cult a year ago. He also received the liberal hate mob attacks, trying to demonetize his channel by flagging videos as hate speech, sending him death threats, even harassing his girlfriend to try to get her to break up with him.
This Week in Stupid (24/04/2016) - Social Justice is a Cult Edition!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN0oKIMlHyI
This is one of the inevitabilities of letting just any idiot go to university-level schooling: any type of brainwashing can be pumped out and the low IQ students eat it up thinking it is real knowledge.
Reason does tend to be confounded by unreason, rather stupidly in my opinion, because it happens all the time. The good Professor appears to be laboring under the misapprehension that these "student" demands are intended to address legitimate grievances; they are nothing of the sort, they are not appeals to reason, they are intended first to dominate, and then to humiliate. The people making them know this perfectly well. Why, then, does an educated man find it so difficult to comprehend?
Evergreen has for quite some time been subjected to this systemic academic rot. Its current president, who was identified in another article as, God help us, a sociologist, is demonstrably too weak for the position and Weinstein's colleague in the Media department is openly complicit with information warfare against a fellow faculty member. As a STEM professor he is a class enemy. As a white (strike one) man (strike two) of reason (strike three) he is a target. As to where does this violence end, that is very well-established in history: it ends in the cattle cars. There is no excuse for any educated person in the 21st century not to know this.
...you asked me what would have to happen for us to right the ship, the second one is my faculty colleagues have to wake up to the fact that their belief structure has become bizarre and unrecognizable from any normal position.
Well, yes, and that's the problem you run into when your opponents are trying to establish a New Normal with themselves as unchallengeable arbiters. They're not there to discuss the matter. Their belief system only appears bizarre; in fact, it's the oldest of them all: submit and obey and die. And the only proper response from an intelligent person toward this totalitarian frenzy is force.
Never picked up after hearing him drone on for 1 hour about a VALUE, a conviction, or an absolute, or a Universal Truth. Just all relativism and no yard stick, no idea of a rule of law.
In their quest for power, left has been deeming all sorts of idiotic values to be virtues for decades. Is it really a surprise that it’s devolved into a contest to see who can be the most “virtuous”?
Again, the guy needs to feel a sense of failure, that after all of his trips to Ecuador, he never had any faithful disciples, probably they sensed he was a ship without a rudder. How can he call himself a Jew, and yet hem haw around about some people believing in an entity that is Higher. I think the student body is WISE and has seen through the empty heads of the Evergreen University. Reminds me of the movie, the Emperor Had No Clothes, when at last a small child said, BUT HE DOESN’T HAVE ON ANY CLOTHES. These professors are chasing their own tails and have not given any life changing value system for the students to grasp.
I don’t know that Weinstein is that liberal. He does seem have the ability to reason quite well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.