Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bret Weinstein on Evergreen: ‘it is very cult-like’
Hotair.com ^ | 6-4-17 | John Sexton

Posted on 06/04/2017 12:08:15 PM PDT by DeweyCA

Professor Bret Weinstein, who has been at the center of the chaos unfolding at Evergreen State College, gave an interview to Joe Rogan Friday in which he describes what has been going on at the college both before and after this story became national news. It’s a long interview but a compelling one. I’ve transcribed some of the most interesting bits for those who don’t have time to listen to all two and a half hours of it.

Many of the points Weinstein makes here have been made by conservatives many times, but the fact that he is a progressive teaching at one of the most left-wing schools in the country makes it hard to dismiss his critique as being part of a racist backlash. At least it should make it hard. But of course, the campus mob is now calling him a racist and demanding his head for saying these things. As you’ll see toward the end, there is no “venue” in this system of thought for someone who wants to defend themselves against the charge they are a racist. You are simply supposed to accept the claim as true without debate.

What follows is a vision of where the progressive campus is headed, not just at Evergreen but everywhere. It’s a nightmare.

On how and why he wound up being called a racist by protesters:

Bret Weinstein: The people who have talked to me privately and expressed concerns are actually quite a diverse group, so it’s not as if white folks are disturbed by this and people of color are united. It’s not at all like that. Part of the hidden story here is that in order to advance certain policy proposals it has to appear that the community is united behind them and that anybody that stands against them is standing against them for illegitimate reasons. So that means that the number of people who are willing to express any sort of nuance about what’s taking place has to be small and they have to be dismissable. So what they did is they called me a racist. Which is ironic because I’m an anti-racist. I really have gone out of my way to, first of all, study the question of why racism occurs and I believe have been pretty courageous in fighting against it wherever I run into it. So to challenge me with that particular epithet was a mistake on their part. It was a strategic mistake. And I kept trying to tell them while this was still internally being discussed in the college. I kept trying to tell them that they should really check the concept that I’m a racist. They should ask. Because if they did, they would discover that they were actually way off the mark and then they would have an interesting puzzle on their hands. Then they would have to explain to themselves why they had found themselves hurling this most poisonous term at somebody who not only isn’t a racist but is pretty nearly the opposite.

On the redefinition of the term racism

Weinstein: This also actually points to something pretty important and for anybody who travels this ground themselves, they’re going to discover this. Many of the terms that are being used have been redefined, but they haven’t been fully redefined. So one of the things that I’ve seen in several places is that a term like racist has been redefined so that the bar for being a racist is so low that you couldn’t possibly help but trip over it. But then, once you’ve tripped over it and you have accepted that you are a racist, then the stigma goes back to the original definition. So it is the dodging and weaving between the two definitions that actually does the heavy lifting.

Joe Rogan: Well there’s also a really disturbing idea that’s being bounced around lately that it’s impossible to be racist if you’re anything other than white, which is ridiculous.

Weinstein: Preposterous. Anybody who looks up the actual definition of racism will discover that that’s preposterous but yes that does pass in certain places as logical.

On the progressive campus bubble

Weinstein: Well, this is the most shocking thing. I’m, you know, I haven’t been censured. I haven’t been suspended. I’m still on the email distribution lists, so I’m watching the traffic inside of my college and I’m able to compare it to the huge flood of stuff that I’m seeing from the outside world as they get wind of what’s going on at Evergreen. The difference is a million miles. Inside of Evergreen, actually, we are descending further into madness. The faculty are blaming the fact that the campus had to be suddenly closed due to a threat from the outside yesterday on me, for having talked about this in the outside world…

The intensity and the out-of-touch nature of the discussion inside the college simply reinforces the impression that something is desperately off, that what we really have is a filter bubble that is so strong that even when the world sends very clear evidence that you’ve missed something somewhere and it’s time to rethink what you’ve been doing, they’re not waking up.

On the complaints about the college president’s microaggressions

Weinstein: Did you see the video in which Dr. Bridges, our president, is being challenged for his hand gestures? The protesters are actually policing his hand gestures.

Rogan: No. What’s wrong with his hand gestures?…

Weinstein: I don’t want to caricature this because I really think it’s very important. As preposterous as what’s going on is, I think it’s very important that we understand it. It’s very easy to dismiss it because it’s so strange but it’s very important that we get it right. I think the complaint about the hand gestures was that they represented microaggressions if you will. I don’t know for sure that that was the complaint but I can’t make heads or tails of it otherwise.

Rogan: What was he doing?

Weinstein: I think he was kind of gesturing like a person…

Rogan: Just trying to talk with emotion.

Weinstein: Right. So I do think there’s a translation which [gestures with his arms], this can be portrayed as a microaggression in some way.

Rogan: How is this a microaggression?

Weinstein: I mean, it isn’t. We should talk about whether or not microaggressions are even a good category. Let’s just say the protesters had enough control over him that he gestured, they didn’t like it, they told him not to and he capitulated, which he has been doing the entire time.

On responding to bullying

Rogan: There’s also the problem, the very real problem, with the mob mentality. It is a common thing with human beings when they get together in large groups and people start chanting and screaming and they feel very justified. And they always want to escalate…It’s a weird thing that people do but I was watching it in your videos where people are saying ‘You should resign’…’You need to apologize to that woman for communicating with her the way you did’…They want to bully you around. They want to push you around. They want to take that professor, that guy who has been allowed to be the one who’s talking and distributing all the information and they want to shut you down.

Weinstein: It’s flat out bullying. And what I’m seeing is that almost nobody seems to know what to do about bullies, especially when they’re armed with the superweapon like the accusation that you’re a racist. Nobody understands that capitulating to bullies may solve your problem in the moment but it makes the problem vastly worse over time. And so, all I’ve done is apply that piece of knowledge, that when a bully challenges you not capitulating is just a prerequisite to getting anywhere. Ideally, you want the bully to pay enough of a price that they don’t continue what they’re doing.

On being contacted by Yale Professor Nicholas Christakis

Rogan: You’re fighting against this current movement of ridiculous ideas that’s going on through schools and we saw it with Yale. We saw it with those students screaming at…Was it a professor who was trying to defend his wife’s email about Halloween costumes? That maybe we should allow people to wear ridiculous Halloween costumes because that’s part of the fun of Halloween. People were acting like you were saying we should by lynching people.

Weinstein: Well, so first of all, he did reach out to me and his point was what you are going through is eerily reminiscent—he’d watched the videos and he was just pointing out how shocking it was.

On whether or not the school actually asked white people to leave campus for a day

Weinstein: Their claim is that white people were not asked to leave campus, that there were only 200 spaces in the venue off campus and therefore this was just supposed to be for a small subset of people—which is nonsense. There were only 200 spaces if you wanted to go to the particular seminars that they were holding […] but in any case, they are conflating the 200 spaces off campus with what was actually expected of us and it was quite clear. In fact, one of my staff colleagues put out an email…I think it was last night, in which he detailed the several emails that we had seen in which the school did ask white people to leave for that day. So they are promoting falsehoods themselves designed to obscure what’s going on, I think because they finally understood that the world doesn’t get what they are doing.

On the intersectional left behaving like a cult

Weinstein: Several people, in fact, many people, have started to now refer to what’s going on in the staff/faculty zone here as a cult. And I think, on the one hand, that could be tongue-in-cheek. On the other hand, the mechanisms at work that have people doubling down on absurdities rather than trying to get on the right side of history as quickly as possible, it is very cult like. Again, you asked me what would have to happen for us to right the ship, the second one is my faculty colleagues have to wake up to the fact that their belief structure has become bizarre and unrecognizable from any normal position.

On being accused of racism and told he should not defend himself

Weinstein: There was an instance where a faculty member accused those who were challenging any of these equity proposals as being part of a racist backlash. She was clearly talking about me because I’m the most prominent person objecting.

Rogan: Is this faculty member a white person?

Weinstein: No. So anyway she says in a faculty meeting that this is a racist backlash and I said to her in front of this faculty meeting, I said, ‘Somebody might want to check on the question of whether or not I’m actually a racist because if you do check on it, you will discover I’m not and if you don’t this is going to blow up on you.’ And the chair of the faculty told me that the faculty meeting was not the place to defend myself against accusations of racism.

Rogan: It’s also not the place to level the accusation.

Weinstein: But I said to her ‘Where is the place?’ and then the faculty member who had made the accusations said ‘You should not expect there to be a venue in which to defend yourself. You should just get used to these accusations.’

On the search of his emails by the professor who accused him of racism

Rogan: So what does this person [who made the allegation of racism against Weinstein] teach?

Weinstein: They teach media.

Rogan: How ironic.

Weinstein: Right. They teach media. They are currently running a program where she’s teaching students to make documentaries and one of the students in the program filed a public records request. Since we are a public college you can request the emails of faculty and staff if you want them. And so she had a student file a public records request for my email to make a documentary in her program. So you’ve got one faculty member searching another faculty member’s email through a student looking for evidence of I don’t know what.

Rogan: Evidence of racism.

Weinstein: Well, presumably.

Conclusion

I’ve only transcribed a fraction of the entire interview but, hopefully, it’s enough to give you a picture of what is taking place behind the scenes at Evergreen. This is a college that is beginning to take on some behavior that seems cult-like, but which is also becoming dangerous. As Rogan points out at one point, you have to wonder what the students were going to do to Professor Weinstein if they had found him while searching cars last week. Would they have hauled him out? Surrounded him and not allowed him to leave? The protesters complain they are being unfairly tarred as violent but while they may not be throwing punches, they are up for intimidation and humiliation. The real question is what happens when someone finally tells them no.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: academicbias; colleges; cults; evergreencollege; groupthink; leftism; liberalism; mentalillness; progressivism; racism; weinstein
This is the logical end of the Leftist mentality that has been promoted on campuses for the past decades. The cultish groupthink of victimhood and moral and intellectual superiority of the Left demands that others simply shut up and accept their bullying accusations of racism and sexism. They are totalitarians at heart. (much like Obama, Hillary and other Dems) This interview is significant because Weinstein is himself a self-proclaimed Progressive who backed Bernie Sanders. He is NOT a conservative complaining about Progressives. It is now getting so bad that even some Progressive professors are starting to see the rot on college campuses. Of course, the Leftist profs will probably never realize that they are the very people who made it all possible.
1 posted on 06/04/2017 12:08:15 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Always amusing to watch a lib getting mugged by reality - especially when it’s happening in slow motion, as it is in Weinstein’s case.


2 posted on 06/04/2017 12:16:56 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

The guy has made some progress but he still has a long way to go to full sanity. He’s still trying to find ways to justify their demented behavior.


3 posted on 06/04/2017 12:17:51 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

What happened in evergreen is liberal vs liberal. For decades, they doctrines a bunch of liberal bs. They practice them by admitting students not based on academic merit but on some political correctness. Now they reaping what they sow


4 posted on 06/04/2017 12:21:04 PM PDT by Lee25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Cut their funding let the leftist students run the college.

Offer other students that are sane a transfer and pair 2 years of tuition at any other college with the fund they yank from evergreen.

See how far the G_D DAMNED SJW crispy critters get.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrmUkq0jXYA


5 posted on 06/04/2017 12:21:26 PM PDT by GraceG ("It's better to have all the Right Enemies, that it is to have all the Wrong Friends.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

It’s all ingrained in our pop culture now. I had the misfortune of watching Saturday Night Live last week and 80% of the skits had something to do with race. Of course their sanctimonious moral superiority ALLOWS them to say whatever they want. I have never see America so in trouble.


6 posted on 06/04/2017 12:24:44 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

“Racism” is a 20th century neologism with no fixed meaning.

And this poor fool is “racist” by any reasonable definition.


7 posted on 06/04/2017 12:26:13 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thanks so much for your support to this point... I personally apprecaite it...
FReepers, it's time to wrap up this FReep-a-thon.  Lets do it...


President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America

Ramirez political cartoon: Economic Climate Change LARGE VERSION
06/03/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).


Please join the monthlies, an automated and the best way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  
LINK



FReepers, 84.26% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

Just $654.00 to 85.00%

8 posted on 06/04/2017 12:30:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (May the Covfefe be with you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Since the 1980s, on Campus it's been

“Hey. Hey, ho, ho, Western Civ has got to go”

Well, after 30 years under attack Western Civ is almost gone.

Unfortunately, Western Civilization is the only real civilization the world has ever known

We are now descending into irrational, illogical and violent tribalism

9 posted on 06/04/2017 12:31:29 PM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

It is Marxist critical theory that has been injected into all curricula, since 1965 or earlier-—to literally, destroy the minds of our children and brainwash them, and destroy the Christian worldview, so that emotions will always rule Reason.

The Age of Reason (Christianity) has to destroy virtue formation in children and normalize warped, versions of history and lies, etc., so they can control the emotions for life of the children, and trigger “group-think” mob actions like we saw with the Brownshirts. The whole Prussian school system is a brainwashing tool put in by the sodomite Marxists in the 1800s to get total control over America—a 100 year plan.

It is working. Look at the dumb, ignorant, immoral youth that are being pumped out of all of the universities. Without wisdom, knowledge and virtue, civil society will collapse. The Marxists knew this and that was their plan-—destroy and control the minds of the masses (Hollywood run by sodomites to destroy virtue and warp desires and create envy, etc) and the school curricula which erased all Classical Christian curricula by 1950s so they could flip the worldview of little children-—into evil, corrupt non-thinking masses.


10 posted on 06/04/2017 12:33:33 PM PDT by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Youtuber Sargon of Akkad is a liberal, British atheist, and he was calling social justice a cult a year ago. He also received the liberal hate mob attacks, trying to demonetize his channel by flagging videos as hate speech, sending him death threats, even harassing his girlfriend to try to get her to break up with him.

This Week in Stupid (24/04/2016) - Social Justice is a Cult Edition!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN0oKIMlHyI


11 posted on 06/04/2017 1:15:03 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

This is one of the inevitabilities of letting just any idiot go to university-level schooling: any type of brainwashing can be pumped out and the low IQ students eat it up thinking it is real knowledge.


12 posted on 06/04/2017 1:21:59 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Very illuminating case, although Professor Weinstein appears still to be a bit dimmed by ideology. He'll brighten up or find another job.

Reason does tend to be confounded by unreason, rather stupidly in my opinion, because it happens all the time. The good Professor appears to be laboring under the misapprehension that these "student" demands are intended to address legitimate grievances; they are nothing of the sort, they are not appeals to reason, they are intended first to dominate, and then to humiliate. The people making them know this perfectly well. Why, then, does an educated man find it so difficult to comprehend?

Evergreen has for quite some time been subjected to this systemic academic rot. Its current president, who was identified in another article as, God help us, a sociologist, is demonstrably too weak for the position and Weinstein's colleague in the Media department is openly complicit with information warfare against a fellow faculty member. As a STEM professor he is a class enemy. As a white (strike one) man (strike two) of reason (strike three) he is a target. As to where does this violence end, that is very well-established in history: it ends in the cattle cars. There is no excuse for any educated person in the 21st century not to know this.

...you asked me what would have to happen for us to right the ship, the second one is my faculty colleagues have to wake up to the fact that their belief structure has become bizarre and unrecognizable from any normal position.

Well, yes, and that's the problem you run into when your opponents are trying to establish a New Normal with themselves as unchallengeable arbiters. They're not there to discuss the matter. Their belief system only appears bizarre; in fact, it's the oldest of them all: submit and obey and die. And the only proper response from an intelligent person toward this totalitarian frenzy is force.

13 posted on 06/04/2017 3:02:52 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
The guy has made some progress but he still has a long way to go to full sanity. He’s still trying to find ways to justify their demented behavior.

Exactly. That "right side of history" remark. Yeeshh. No, he still doesn't get it.
14 posted on 06/04/2017 3:25:18 PM PDT by 98ZJ USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

Never picked up after hearing him drone on for 1 hour about a VALUE, a conviction, or an absolute, or a Universal Truth. Just all relativism and no yard stick, no idea of a rule of law.


15 posted on 06/04/2017 4:19:50 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

In their quest for power, left has been deeming all sorts of idiotic values to be virtues for decades. Is it really a surprise that it’s devolved into a contest to see who can be the most “virtuous”?


16 posted on 06/04/2017 4:24:20 PM PDT by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Again, the guy needs to feel a sense of failure, that after all of his trips to Ecuador, he never had any faithful disciples, probably they sensed he was a ship without a rudder. How can he call himself a Jew, and yet hem haw around about some people believing in an entity that is Higher. I think the student body is WISE and has seen through the empty heads of the Evergreen University. Reminds me of the movie, the Emperor Had No Clothes, when at last a small child said, BUT HE DOESN’T HAVE ON ANY CLOTHES. These professors are chasing their own tails and have not given any life changing value system for the students to grasp.


17 posted on 06/04/2017 4:54:18 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

I don’t know that Weinstein is that liberal. He does seem have the ability to reason quite well.


18 posted on 06/04/2017 6:11:39 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson