Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant To Shut Down In 2019
NPR ^ | May 30, 2017 11:58 AM ET | Merrit Kennedy

Posted on 05/30/2017 10:13:29 AM PDT by Olog-hai

The company that owns the Three Mile Island nuclear plant, site of the worst nuclear disaster in U.S. history, announced that it plans to shutter the facility in 2019 unless the state of Pennsylvania steps in to keep it open.

The plant near Harrisburg, Pa., hasn’t been profitable for the past five years, according to owner Exelon Corp. The company announced last week that it failed to auction off future energy production from Three Mile Island for the third year in a row.

“Today is a difficult day, not just for the 675 talented men and women who have dedicated themselves to operating Three Mile Island safely and reliably every day, but also for their families, the communities and customers who depend on this plant to produce clean energy and support local jobs,” Exelon CEO Chris Crane said in a statement.

Tuesday’s announcement highlights the challenges to the nuclear power industry — which “faces slowing demand for electricity, and competition from cheaper natural gas and renewables,” as StateImpact Pennyslvania’s Marie Cusick has reported. …

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: envirowackos; exelon; liberalagenda; meltdown; naturalgas; necessarilyskyrocket; nuclearpower; paping; threemileisland

1 posted on 05/30/2017 10:13:30 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
unless the state of Pennsylvania steps in to keep it open.

translation: Force me to subsidize you with my tax money. No thanks.


2 posted on 05/30/2017 10:16:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Sell it to Iran and then the Leftist protesters will hush up,


3 posted on 05/30/2017 10:19:33 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The so-called mainstream media resembles a sixth grade lunchroom these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

so it cannot make a profit, because no one wants to buy power from a nuclear plant...

i bet if the subsidies to the renewable energies were lifted, the price would be comparable...


4 posted on 05/30/2017 10:22:02 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
translation: Force me to subsidize you with my tax money. No thanks.

Tuesday’s announcement highlights the challenges to the nuclear power industry — which “faces slowing demand for electricity, and competition from cheaper natural gas and renewables,”

The "renewables" they mention are a small fraction of electrical power production, but are cheaper than nuke BECAUSE of the subsidize given them. $176 billion worth. For 1.9% of all power produced in the US.

5 posted on 05/30/2017 10:28:57 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

The low price of natural gas is cleaning their clock.
That and the maintenance expense for a nuke plant turns
out to be far higher than what was projected at the time
it was built.


6 posted on 05/30/2017 10:31:03 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Fracking Wins!


7 posted on 05/30/2017 10:32:50 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So much for “too cheap to meter”


8 posted on 05/30/2017 10:34:00 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Still we should build the storage facility at Yucca Mountain. Deposit our waste and that of foreign nations.


9 posted on 05/30/2017 10:36:56 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Yup. Exelon is essentially screaming “Me too! Me too!”


10 posted on 05/30/2017 10:37:46 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

yes i rembemer that.so cheap they said no meter needed.


11 posted on 05/30/2017 10:39:43 AM PDT by old gringo (a wise monkey never monkeys with another monkeys monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

Never mind unnecessary regulations on nuke power generation.


12 posted on 05/30/2017 10:44:42 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
FReepers, it's time to get serious about retiring this FReep-a-thon.


President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America

Ramirez political cartoon: the Price of Freedom LARGE VERSION
05/28/2017: LINK  LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).


Please join the monthlies, an automated way to help support Free Republic.

If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project.  
LINK



FReepers, 62.54% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met.  Click above and pencil in your donation now.  Please folks, lets end this FReepathon.  Thank you!

...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...

Just $401.00 to 63.00%

13 posted on 05/30/2017 10:45:08 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Early nineties repeat. Once the price of natural gas soars, as it will, it will be a different story.


14 posted on 05/30/2017 10:45:13 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: old gringo

Then the KGB financed anti-nukes and Carter happened, basically freezing nuclear technology in 1950s technology and driving up the cost of every aspect of nuclear power generation.

And renewables are not at all cheaper — they are horrendously subsidized.


15 posted on 05/30/2017 10:49:38 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

“And renewables are not at all cheaper — they are horrendously subsidized.”

Would you happen to know to what extent nuclear power has been subsidized?


16 posted on 05/30/2017 10:57:06 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Once the price of natural gas soars, as it will, it will be a different story.

What is the capacity of the natural gas pipelines in the TMI service area?

I hear the pipeline permits can take forever.

They may want to get on it now.


17 posted on 05/30/2017 11:58:03 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (GO TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

As far as I know, none of the pipelines are in the TMI area. Lots are being built in western PA and WV. If you’re traveling and see large stockpiles of green coated pipe, that’s a staging area for the pipeline. Those pipelines are under construction. It’s going to be a mixed bag with exports providing an impetus to higher prices and a larger amount of shale play gas getting moved to market and putting downward pressure on the price of gas. The wild card is how many natural gas fired power plants will come online. In the early nineties a similar construction frenzy spiked the price of natural gas. Enron had around 200 units on order when they went bankrupt.


18 posted on 05/30/2017 12:46:36 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: old gringo
"yes i rembemer that.so cheap they said no meter needed."

I believe that was Nixon on developing fast-breeder reactors. That idea was killed over concerns about "nuclear-proliferation," which was something the government use to worry about.
19 posted on 05/30/2017 4:33:39 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

LOL. Just about the only thing that isn’t subsidized are people actually working for a living.

The point isn’t whether something is subsidized to get it going, but whether it requires continuing support to even be viable. Hydrocarbons and nukes could be done without subsidy (Whether they ever will be is a separate issue).

“Renewables” are only as renewable as the tax money flowing in.


20 posted on 05/30/2017 9:02:05 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson