Posted on 05/26/2017 4:30:09 AM PDT by Kaslin
What a difference a week makes. On May 19, President Donald Trump took off in Air Force One for the Middle East and Europe. He left behind a Washington and a nation buzzing about his firing of FBI Director James Comey, the multiple reasons he had given for doing so, the meeting he'd had with the Russian foreign minister a day later and his statement that Comey is a "nut job."
The I-word -- impeachment -- was in the air as Democrats and mainstream media muttered that he was obstructing justice by attempting to throttle investigation of collusion with the Russians. Brainy and quirky conservative New York Times columnist Ross Douthat argued that the Trump Cabinet should remove him from office as unfit under the 25th Amendment.
So it has been something of a surprise to see the Trump who emerged from Air Force One in Riyadh behaving quite differently, like a competent American president.
In Saudi Arabia, he delivered a sobering speech that invites comparison with Barack Obama's Cairo address to the Muslim world almost exactly eight years ago.
Obama apologized for the misdeeds of the West, ranging from the Crusades a millennium ago to 19th- and 20th-century colonialism to the overthrow of the Mosaddegh regime in Iran eight years before he was born. Trump apologized for nothing.
Instead, before an assembly of leaders from about 50 Muslim-majority nations, Trump denounced in no uncertain terms Islamic extremism and Islamic terror groups and insisted that Muslims must "drive them out" of their places of worship, communities and "holy land."
Trump also announced a $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia and denounced Iran for fueling "the fires of sectarian conflict and terror." This presumably delighted the Saudis and the leaders of Egypt, Jordan and the Persian Gulf States, who were dismayed at Obama's eight-year tilt toward Iran.
That started with his cold indifference to the mullah regime's squashing of the 2009 protests and culminated in the 2015 nuclear agreement, which, as Obama adviser Ben Rhodes confessed to The New York Times Magazine, was pushed through with a false "narrative" and a compliant media "echo chamber."
At best, the deal delayed Iran's acquisition of nuclear arms; it has not changed Iran's terrorist-supporting behavior as Obama apparently hoped. Trump's turn to an explicitly anti-Iran policy may turn out better.
Trump then journeyed to Israel -- on the first scheduled nonstop flight from Riyadh to Tel Aviv in history -- and became the first sitting president to visit the Western Wall. In Bethlehem, at the side of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, he condemned the "evil losers" responsible for the bombing of a concert hall in Manchester, England. In Vatican City, emerging from an apparently amicable meeting with Pope Francis, Trump said, "I won't forget what you said."
The next stops, as this is written, are a NATO meeting in Brussels and a G-7 meeting in Taormina, Sicily. It's possible that Trump will commit some dreadful faux pas along the way. But so far, he has been behaving presidentially.
That may come as a surprise to critics. New York Times editorialists have whined that he is forsaking the policies of his two immediate predecessors, but they haven't fully explained why those policies should be followed. In fact, Trump has not gone so far as his campaign rhetoric sometimes suggested.
The U.S. Embassy remains in Tel Aviv, not Jerusalem; the Iranian nuclear deal has not been renounced; America remains a signer of the Paris climate declaration. John Bolton complained in The Wall Street Journal that Trump has failed to make changes abroad, just as Ann Coulter is complaining that he is failing to build the wall along our southern border.
My tentative conclusion is that Trump is more of a conventional president than he promised or than his critics fear. His early morning tweets are unnerving; his propensity for unrehearsed ad-libs is potentially dangerous; his taste in interior decoration is appalling.
But the notion that he won the presidency through collusion with Russia is implausible and is wholly without evidence. His odd campaign statements about Vladimir Putin and Russia were known to voters, and Hillary Clinton made intelligent criticism of them in the debates.
Democrats and journalists assuming that further investigations will lead to impeachment are pursuing what movie director Alfred Hitchcock called a MacGuffin -- something a movie's characters are pursuing that is, to quote Wikipedia, "typically unimportant to the overall plot."
Now the question is whether Donald Trump, after acting like a president abroad, can start doing so at home.
He was treated with respect in Arabia and Israel. A little less so in Europe but more than at home. If the press behaved in even a modicum of courtesy or respect, we’d see that President every day.
No it isn’t. Trump publicly called on Russia to help the US get to the bottom of what actually had been (note, past tense - the server no longer existed by then) on the server that Hillary wiped witha clothBleachbit®.That is the “evidence."
——In Vatican City, emerging from an apparently amicable meeting with Pope Francis, Trump said, “I won’t forget what you said.”-—
This went over my head. What exactly did the Pope say?
While the writer of the piece is a sanctimonious hypocrite, snide, offensive and an obvious Globalist shill the article is useful for the insight it gives into the mindset of the RINO class, who are starting to pedal backwards towards 1/2 hearted Trump bashing while still loathing & resenting him.
At a campaign rally candidate Trump made a joke that perhaps Russia could help find Hillary’s missing 33,,000 emails
That is “ a call for Russian assistance”?
” Try the veal......”
“Now the question is whether Donald Trump, after acting like a president abroad, can start doing so at home.”
I missed it Barone, please elucidate what he has done (or not done) since his inauguration to merit this remark. Does this require kissing RINO GOPe and reneging on campaign promises???
Yes he was, and he earned the respect. The left-wing press though will never give him the respect.
Precisely. The aggressive hostility the US MSM exhibits minute by minute toward the president is not reflected by the American people or any other venue anywhere else in the world. Nor is their dyspeptic distemper justified.
Only the evil lens of global Marxism is sufficient to explain the seething hatred with which President Trump is assaulted by the globalist titans of the media, of Soros and his demonic cult, and their lackey, the Democrat party.
Agree...
Barone writes, “My tentative conclusion is that Trump is more of a conventional president than he promised or than his critics fear. His early morning tweets are unnerving; his propensity for unrehearsed ad-libs is potentially dangerous; his taste in interior decoration is appalling.”
“Plastics?”
LOL!!
“Democrats and journalists assuming that further investigations will lead to impeachment are pursuing what movie director Alfred Hitchcock called a MacGuffin — something a movie’s characters are pursuing that is, to quote Wikipedia, “typically unimportant to the overall plot.””
I had forgotten this word. Totally applies here.
"One word..."
Is there actual evidence that PDJT called Comey a “nut job”? Or is this another “sources say” accusation? Any accusation by an anonymous source needs to be called “alleged.”
Trump needs to set the tone, not the press. Yes, the press is a bunch of howling babies because their candidate lost, but Trump needs to be Presidential whether or not he is treated the way he wants to be.
You digress.......
The question was “what did the Pope actually say?”
Oh, stop it. He’s presidential enough for me and many others. Hope he comes right back to the USA and starts tweeting - just to upset you and other panty-waists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.