Posted on 05/25/2017 9:32:29 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
I gladly cede the “best understands Barack Obama” title to you.
It’s gratifying to have you put that into the public record, knowing as you do that I consider Obama to be a pathological liar/malignant narcissist.
Congratulations!
Those congratulations belong to you, for ***finally*** conceding that Obama is a Malignant Narcissist. It took a while, but reality prevailed in the end.
Far be it from me to disagree with the Knowledge of Barack Obama titleholder.
I’ll leave the psychological diagnoses to you.
No surprise. Germany has a sad history of sidling up to narcissistic dictators.
I understand Obama, by your own admission, better than you do. That’s hardly a title; a great many people understand Obama better than you do. But you’re making headway and that’s what counts.
You are indeed an Obama understanding legend in your own mind. That was not a competition that I ever had the slightest interest in. Once again, I leave you to it.
Now you’re sounding like the raging Leftist you are. I’m struck by the fact that throughout the many years you used this site to A, defend Obama, and B, post propaganda from the FR/JR hate-site, Fogbow, you never once conceded that Obama has an unusually difficult time telling the truth. By the end of his two terms even LIVs had realized that Obama throws out lies with casual frequency—but not you. You still had him on a pedestal, and treated him as if he had integrity.
Now you’ve decided to revert to the Alinsky-style mockery on which Obots survive. I’m not surprised. When you’ve devoted as many years as you have to defending the honor of a pathological liar, in the end Alinsky is all you have.
Your post got me thinking, how did I ever get interested in the Obama birthplace/eligibility debate in the first place.
Here’s a link to the very first (2009) article I ever read on the Obama/Natural Born Citizen issue. Ironically, it references both Saul Alinsky and Free Republic!
I found it buried in the deep dark recesses of the hard drive on a computer I no longer use.
In case you are unaware, the Hawaii Free Press is the conservative alternative print media to the left wing mainstream print media in Hawaii.
http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/649/911-Truthers-Meet-the-Birth-Certificate-Brigade.aspx
“The Hawai`i Free Press is an independent, locally-owned on-line newspaper covering political, social, cultural, and economic issues from local to international. Hawai`i Free Press brings out points of view based on free enterprise, small government, and individual liberty as a counterpoint to what is presented in the rest of Hawai`i print and television media.”
You could post a 1000 articles, and you’d still be in the dark. Unless and until you come to the realization that Obama is fundamentally dishonest, you’ll be clueless.
Of course he’s fundamentally dishonest, he’s a Democrat politician; duh! He’s a fundamentally dishonest Democrat who was born at 7:24 pm on Friday, August 4, 1961 at Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynocological Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.
There you go again. It’s like the lyrics of that song I once posted to you: Always Crashing in the Same Car. For you, the car is critical-rational thinking, and you’ve crashed in it ~a million times.
You say Obams is fundamentally dishonest, but when it comes to birth-related issues, he tells nothing but the truth. If it concerns his nativity tales and it comes out of Obama’s mouth, you tell us to take it to the bank; the word of a fundamentally dishonest person is, on this subject, unimpeachable.
Ah, but you counter with ‘Politicians!’ And, ‘Political Appointees!’ As in, ‘You don’t have to believe Obama—all you have to do is believe political hacks and their hack minions.’
If you actually did counter with that line, at this juncture, it would be one of two things: pure Obot trollery, or a shameless admission that you don’t have two brain cells to rub together.
We’ll skip B, for now ( while not ruling it out). Let’s focus on A.
Here’s the issue.
Politicians and their appointees lie. It’s not a rare, exceptional occurrence; it’s their SOP. Both parties do it. If there is any political or personal gain in lying, or any pain in telling the truth, they lie. It’s how they operate; it’s a fact of political life.
In the case of Obama’s BC, it would have fallen into the category of, ‘a little white lie.’ Obama already had handwritten birth records on file. All that was required was to refer to these as a ‘BC,’ in the earlier stages, and to convert them into an actual, only somewhat dishonest, BC when circumstances called for it.
But the honest person of average intelligence knows Obama was not born in HI. There is no trace of his mother there for at least 7 mos leading up to his birth, and no trace of her there following his birth. When Stanley Ann finally emerges from her black hole, it’s in Seattle. No Obot theory covers this anomaly; it’s inconsistent with the HI birth narrative.
The HI birth is a myth, and at this point only Obots fall into the category of true believers.
This is because they sacrificed critical-rational thinking long ago, in service to a pathological liar.
I could be wrong, but I’m thinking that it might be a wee bit too late to frog-march Obama out of the People’s House.
“Barack Obama was born in the United States, period. Hillary Clinton and her campaign started the birther controversy, I FINISHED it.”—Donald J. Trump, 9/15/16
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-birther-obama-born-in-us-2016-9
Since the President of the United States says that he has “finished” this “issue,” that’s good enough for me and I have nothing further to add on this [former] subject.
I pinged you to this thread to note that Obama is using his post presidency to sabotage Trump. This means my prediction about him was right and yours was wrong. Naturally you panicked, being incapable of carrying on a real time discussion re Obama and his duplicity.
So what did you do?
You linked to some a so-called ‘anti-birther,’ article, since your response to panic and your inability to think independently invariably cause you to seek safety in a link.
Unfortunately for you, your silly Obot narrative got blown sky high. So you changed the subject to frog marching.
So far as I know, pathological lying isn’t even a misdemeanor, much less a felony. It’s simply the symptom of a deeply rooted, profoundly destructive Personality Disorder.
But back to the original topic. Once again I thank you for publicly conceding you don’t understand Obama. It’s a step in the right direction.
Your obsession with the former president is really kind of sad. I suggest that you move on and find something more positive to obsess over.
There are some Germans who still like Obama, including the Chancellor.
Big deal.
If it helps you to feel good about yourself to understand Barack Obama better than someone else, I am happy to concede that to you. Enjoy.
Misrepresenting the case earns you nothing. But sadly, dishonesty has always been an Obot mainstay.
I repeat for the record. You predicted Obama would use his post-presidency to get rich. I said he’d grab the easy money any time it was convenient, while actually devoting himself to undermining and sabotaging Trump.
It should come as a surprise to no one that the Obot called it WRONG. One thing you can always count on from an Obot: utter cluelessness when it comes to Obama’s character and issues.
Btw, you seem curiously unconcerned re the reason Obama and Merkel are bff. You mention it as a casual fact, without reference to the underlying dynamic.
Think about it. Obama spent 8 yrs attempting to destroy America via an unlimited foreign invasion surging daily across the wide open southern border. Had Trump failed to defeat the Uniparty in the primaries, or lost to Crooked in the general, the final stages of the utter annihilation of the US would be proceeding apace.
Merkel is, as we speak, well on her way to destroying Europe. She’s flooding the region with people whose religion teaches them it’s okay to rape infidels, and mandatory to kill them. B ye bye Europe.
Naturally Obama and Merkel adore each other. They are two peas in a pod. Merkel has just been a little more successful in carrying out her destructive machinations; other than that, they are two halves of the same coin.
[Qualifier: Merkel is not in a perpetual snit over imagined racism, but otherwise she and Obama are birds of a feather.]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.