Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson Rips Ex-MSNBCer Krystal Ball's Absurd Impeachment Arguments
Newsbusters.org ^ | May 18, 2017 | Tom Blumer

Posted on 05/19/2017 11:17:44 AM PDT by Kaslin

On the left, there is obsessive talk of impeaching Donald Trump. Despite the fact that the press reports which supposedly form the foundation of such talk are almost always based on anonymous sources, and despite the fact that the Trump administration has successfully refuted most if not all of them, the obsession continues. On his Wednesday night show, after successfully swatting away pathetic pro-impeachment arguments made by guest Krystal Ball and her citations of weak-kneed Republicans who can't seem to resist bending with the Beltway wind, Tucker Carlson got fed up.

The segment (posted in full here) opened with a replay of Texas Democratic Congressman Al Green's call for Trump's impeachment on the House floor, followed by a snip of California Congresswoman Maxine Waters telling a cheering audience at a Center for American Progress event that "this" (whatever it is) "is going to put us a little bit further on our way to what I've been calling for for so long, and that is impeachment."

Carlson then introduced Ball, whom he described as a "former congressional candidate who works with the New Leaders Council, a progressive organization."

There's only so much time for interview introductions, but readers here deserve to know (or be reminded) that there is much more to Ball's resumé.

In that 2010 congressional race in Virginia's First Congressional District, Ball received a whopping 34.8 percent of the vote against incumbent Republican Rob Wittman, who still represents that district. Ball underperformed all but one of Wittman's five other Democratic Party challengers between 2007 and 2016, despite having a platform which allegedly included "Education reform, including charter schools" and "The Second Amendment as ensuring individual gun rights."

As is so often the case, once a Democrat publicly espousing anything resembling reasonable and reform-minded positions makes contact with the leftist bubble, things change.

Ball was an MSNBC host on The Cycle from 2012 to 2015. Her NewsBusters history betrays a sharp turn to the left after that congressional race and a seething hostility towards Republicans and conservatives. This included a belief that the Tea Party movement, which indirectly yet substantially contributed to the rise of Donald Trump, "speaks more to ... (the Republican Party's) moral and intellectual bankruptcy and the crumbling of our democratic process than it does to ... (its genuine) strength." As to the GOP itself, because of its support for voter-ID requirements, it has "taken the place of Jim Crow."

This background is important on two levels.

The first is that it should call into serious question Ball's attempt to play nice in her recent book, Reversing the Apocalypse: Hijacking the Democratic Party to Save the World. Amazon.com's book description says that Ball's work "argues forcefully that the only litmus tests that matter for Democrats should have to do with economic issues and inclusion-and that the social and cultural issues, such as guns and abortion, need to take a back seat to issues of economic justice."

Three immediate observations come to mind:

The second reason Ball's background is important plays directly into the Carlson interview. It's hard to understate, despite her broadcast experience, how poorly she performed, how weak her contentions were, and how bad Carlson made her look.

Ball's strategy appeared to be to put charges out there, leave them on the table, and move on to the next charge as if declaring victory. Carlson wouldn't allow it. Here are two such examples:

Finally, Ball admitted that impeachment in her mind is "ultimately a political question." But instead of even trying to build a political case (given that her attempts at making some kind of legal case were so obviously awful), she began to cite Republicans who are "talking impeachment."

As seen in the segment's final minute below, Carlson's patience ran out, after which Ball tried and even more miserably failed to make something of the alleged pressure Trump exerted on James Comey regarding the FBI's Russia investigation:

Tucker Carlson And Crystal Ball Last Minute — 051717

Transcript:

TUCKER CARLSON: I don't care what your party ID is. I want to know what the facts are. I want to know what's reasonable and true.

KRYSTAL BALL: Mm-hmm.

CARLSON: And I just think it's pretty over the top to call for impeachment with no actual evidence of a crime. That's all I'm saying.

BALL: So let's say that everything that's been reported is true, that he really did try to pressure Comey, would then you think it was an impeachable offense?

CARLSON: If he tried, if it could be shown that this or any other president tried to commit obstruction of justice, that is without question an impeachable offense, and it ought to be pursued, no matter who does it.

BALL: And do you think that what's been reported about pressure on Comey with regards to Michael Flynn, do you think that that constitutes obstruction of justice? 

CARLSON: Well, it prima facie doesn't, because it was to the top law enforcement officer at the FBI. And so presumably, if he thought that constituted obstruction of justice, he would have reported it to the Justice Department, as required by law, and he didn't.

So like, I'm just saying, you can criticize Trump. But to call for his removal from office is a really big deal, and we're throwing it around a little cavalierly. That's all I'm saying.

BALL: So you don't think that would be obstruction of justice, (unintelligible) loyalty?

CARLSON: I'm saying hard break. I'm afraid we're totally out of time.

Carlson had already answered Ball's final question, but, perhaps sensing that she had otherwise been completely routed, she didn't care. She wanted to leave the interview with at least some viewers to think that Carlson hadn't fully responded.

Nice try, Krystal. No sale.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016presidential; cabletelevision; campaigns; conservativesrepubs; foreignpolicy; foxnewschannel; govagencies; jamescomey; krystalball; labeling; libsdemonrants; politicalgroups; presidenttrump; protestors; russia; teaparties; trump; tuckercarlson; tuckercarlsontonight

1 posted on 05/19/2017 11:17:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Tucker, foolishly, allowed her to interview him rather than tossing the ball into her court.
2 posted on 05/19/2017 11:24:08 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Crystal Ball thinks she’s so Clever and Smart, but she’s as dopey as mean girl Jessica Tarlov.


3 posted on 05/19/2017 11:26:06 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Krystal Ball is a hooker name


4 posted on 05/19/2017 11:28:37 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hillary is Ameritrash, pass it on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Sure sounds like one.


5 posted on 05/19/2017 11:30:39 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Apparently, Krystal Ball is her real name. Did her parents want her to grow to be a porn star, or were they just not thinking of how that name sounds?


6 posted on 05/19/2017 11:31:32 AM PDT by Huntress ("Politicians exploit economic illiteracy." --Walter Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yeah, I did a double-take on the name.


7 posted on 05/19/2017 11:38:37 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
They must have been drunk when they named her.

I can just see them, when they said, 'oh lets name her Krystal, get it Krystal Ball, that is so funny'

8 posted on 05/19/2017 12:07:25 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
get it Krystal Ball, that is so funny'

I happen to live in the First district of Virginia. I was going to vote for Rob Wittman anyway, but really was taken back by a liberal candidate with the name Krystal Ball. She was not highly thought of in our district and has since left the state.

9 posted on 05/19/2017 12:37:30 PM PDT by Dustoff45 (Pass the Ketchup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert
Krystal Ball is a hooker name

Either that or her parents were hippies.

10 posted on 05/19/2017 12:41:40 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Good judgement comes from experience. And experience? Well, that comes from poor judgement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dustoff45

I can imagine that she wasn’t


11 posted on 05/19/2017 12:59:43 PM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Krystal Ball - is she any relation to the old Philly stripper Virginia “Ding Dong” Bell?.....


12 posted on 05/19/2017 2:12:57 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson