Posted on 04/09/2017 5:45:55 AM PDT by Enlightened1
——Sceptical-—
The article is in two parts.
His job is to sort through the intel
Working with Petraeus to start a ground war? I doubt it
LS said yesterday the jared and bannon were on same page about syria bombing.
If this is true..kudos to jared...have to say that even though I dont like him being the designated prince
Same guy who wrote “Deriliction of Duty” which was highly critical of manipulated Intel reports on the Vietnam war. Not likely he’d do it himself. Ain’t buyin’.
I don’t see why some Freepers see this as such a stretch?
Given recent events where President Trump was falsely accused by some in the Intelligence Agency of being a Russian spy with no proof.
So why else would they not B.S. something? We all know guys like McCain have been wanting to put U.S. ground troops in Syria. If we were to do that. 150,000 sounds like a low number.
Too many accusations in this story .
I know who Cernovich is. I read r/The_Donald daily. Sometimes Cernovich is right, and sometimes he isn’t. I’d like to know his source for the 1000s of ground troops claim.
Bingo!
I can see them faking Intel. many of them hate Trump
He just ran with it when others wouldn’t. Actually ripped off their reporting. No original reporting on his part. He said that himself.
Yeah he was the first to run with it but he ripped it off from other’s who had actually done the reporting. He said so himself. He did no original reporting on it at all.
I’m sure that there is such a plan, and if it were leaked, it would be very controversial. It doesn’t mean that the plan is anywhere near being executed, however. In fact, the leaker’s motiviation is very likely to prevent that potential troop deployment.
Let’s see — and debate — the evidence that Assad did this before that view, like global warming, becomes one more global opinion that is too politically correct to deny. We should approach this realizing that Assad’s enemies had every incentive to do a false flag. And WE have the burden of proof since we attacked a nation that did not attack us first.
So where did the US is going to strike tonight story come from?
Well, that’s good, because we have no business invading Syria.
“I don’t see why some Freepers see this as such a stretch?”
Because to make the scenario work General Mattis has to be complicit. Not buying that.
Yeah, where did it come from??
“And WE have the burden of proof since we attacked a nation that did not attack us first.”
According to what part of the Constitution is this “burden of proof” laid out?
I’m talking about Susan Rice, and the fact Cernovich did no original reporting. I follow Cernovich on twitter, he’s always been a bit fringy, now he’s over the top. He’s been wrong, way wrong, and everything he says has to be vetted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
