Posted on 04/02/2017 7:43:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
All I can hear is Bill Lumbergh’s voice: “Yeeaahhh, I’m gonna have to say no.” Needless to say, no one to the right of David Souter would survive a vetting process in which Democrats had veto power over a Gorsuch replacement. Besides, various liberal legal luminaries like Neal Katyal and Kathleen Sullivan have already weighed in on whom Trump should appoint to the Supreme Court. They named Neil Gorsuch. There’s your compromise.
I’m surprised this no-hoper of an idea is Schumer’s best shot at a “reasonable” solution to the Gorsuch standoff. He could have floated a new “Gang of 14” instead, in which centrist Democrats partner with centrist Republicans to choose a nominee, which at least would take the nomination out of the hands of Schumer, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren. Or he could have pushed a suggestion made last week somewhere, in which Senate Dems agree to confirm Gorsuch in exchange for a firm promise from McConnell and the Republicans not to eliminate the filibuster for the rest of Trump’s term. But the possibility of a new Gang of 14 went up in smoke when Harry Reid went nuclear in 2013, embittering the Senate confirmation process. And McConnell won’t promise not to eliminate the filibuster, even in return for easy confirmation of Gorsuch, for the simple reason that he doesn’t need to. As long as his caucus holds together, which it appears willing to do — this time — he has the votes to go nuclear and get Gorsuch through. The point has been made often lately but bears repeating: By choosing to make their stand on a nominee as inoffensive and well qualified as Gorsuch, Democrats are signaling that they’d filibuster anyone Trump nominated. It’s pure payback for Merrick Garland. Which is fine if that’s how Schumer wants to play it, but the underlying logic reduces his olive branch to McConnell here to ash. Democrats plainly have no intention of cooperating with Republicans on any nominee, even if Gorsuch’s nomination were withdrawn. So McConnell’s only options are to go nuclear or accept that the Scalia seat will remain vacant indefinitely. He was pretty clear today which option he’s chosen.
YouGov published an interesting pair of polls on this subject yesterday. Do Americans like the idea of Republicans nuking the filibuster? Well, no:
Do Americans like the idea of Democrats filibustering in the first place? Well, no:
Independents are “meh” on both questions. Overall, though, the public thinks Gorsuch should be confirmed (38/26), and even Democrats concede that he’s qualified for the Court (36/26). Taking all of those numbers together, you can see why I think Democrats are making a mistake in using the filibuster now instead of on the next nominee: The public just isn’t exercised enough about Gorsuch to make this gambit an obvious political winner for the left. If you had a truly controversial nominee with the media raging day and night about his unfitness, you might have 50+ percent in favor of a filibuster and the same number opposed to the nuclear option. That would make McConnell, not to mention the purple-staters in his caucus, think twice. As it is, the public’s going to shrug at this week’s proceedings. And then, when the next vacancy opens up and Democrats are clamoring for opposition, the filibuster will be gone already. The most you can say for Schumer’s strategic foolishness here is that it’s been foisted on him by his base, which wants revenge blindly, not something he came by honestly.
Here he is, followed by McConnell being quizzed about his blockade of Merrick Garland. The latest, as of about 2 p.m. ET: Indiana Democrat Joe Donnelly is a yes on Gorsuch, putting the number in favor of cloture at 55. McConnell needs five of the remaining nine undecided Dems to avoid full nuclear release.
Sen. Schumer on Gorsuch nominee: "When a nominee doesn't get 60 votes, you shouldn't change the rules — you should change the nominee." pic.twitter.com/1QmmZZSkcT
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) April 2, 2017
.@SenateMajLdr on Gorsuch: "There's no rational basis — no principled reason — to vote against" Trump's nominee. #MTP pic.twitter.com/Y74WV5ysSt
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) April 2, 2017
Schumer will bring the filibuster threat right up to the edge, perhaps even start one, then suggest a “deal” with the turtle.
The deal will be, we (dems) won’t filibuster if you agree not to use the nuke option on the next justice.
Will the turtle stupidly go for it?
Democrats think they have a right to win every time. They’re entitled to control all aspects of government, no matter how the elections turn out.
Democrats DID have a voice, last Nov. 8.
No.
How about something really simple. Something along the lines of Schuck You Fumer. Elections have consequences.
Oh, RIGHT, Schumer! I’m sure everyone would be on the same page on that. /s
Sure — the same way you asshats consulted the Republicans on the ACA.
The sample has less than 25% Republicans. How come the House and the Senate both have Republican majorities?
I agree. Let the Democrats help choose by putting it to a vote.
Tester will vote no on Gorush , but will he support filibuster? I guess yes?
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-gorsuch-tester-idUSKBN175021
Yep.
We won.
Deal with it.
Hey Chuckie how about you kiss my royal ....
Help? They want to choose it. And the President is the one with that power. The president picked but can’t confirm. The senate confirms but can’t pick. It works well that way. The Dems want it all and they aren’t even in frickin power!
Chucky Shu knows Gorsuch’s confirmation is inevitable. He’s just making noises in hopes of appeasing the hysterical masses of Dem loons.
Elections have consequences.
Yet another ludicrous attack on the GOP leadership. The days of surrender are over.
Gorsuch. Sorry.
Chucky, who said, “WE WON!” “You can ride on the bus but you have to ride in the back of the bus.”
Right back at you!
How about you open your mouth really wide Chuckie.
Because u are about to get a nuke shoved down your throat!
How about NOT!
The “next one” is what has the Ds hopelessly worried. They fear that dear Ruth may move on to her eternal reward and be replaced by a Trump nominee. I’d love it, especially since Ruth very inappropriately spoke out against our president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.