Posted on 03/31/2017 8:44:12 AM PDT by kevcol
There ya go. Some people read these deceptive media headlines and they go with it with little or no thought and then make all kinds of assumptions.
You’d think most everyone by now would understand what the media’s all about.
They’ll probably add Hawaii next week
Jeff Sessions announced recently that he is considering withholding federal funds for cities, states, etc., that consider themselves sanctuary.
In those articles it says that the total federal funds that could be withheld is $4.1B.
Wow! $4.1B
That is a lot of money that could be used to build a wall.
So, take the $4.1B federal funds away from the sanctuary cities, states, etc., and use it to build a wall!
They were simply designated by DHS to that Fed LEO funding could be withheld.
The practice was already in place before the Feds designated them.
The article itself says, The Department of Homeland Security added the entire states of California and Connecticut to its list of U.S. jurisdictions That hinder cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in detaining illegal immigrants.
The headline should read something like, "DHS Lists California and Connecticut as Sanctuary States that Hinder ICE". We wouldn't be wasting our time talking about this if they'd done it right. The media is in the business of vagueness and confusion.
Done.
The article itself says, The Department of Homeland Security added the entire states of California and Connecticut to its list of U.S. jurisdictions That hinder cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in detaining illegal immigrants.
The headline should read something like, "DHS Lists California and Connecticut as Sanctuary States that Hinder ICE". We wouldn't be wasting our time talking about this if they'd done it right. The media is in the business of vagueness and confusion.
Ditto!!! My mouth dropped open when I read the
headlines...
I knew there was a better headline than the one I suggested.
Excellent, thanks.
Headline made it sound as if DHS approves.
It sure does -— I nearly choked on my lunch.
Don’t worry,those people won’t suffer,when moonbeam raises taxes on working class.
Don’t worry,those people won’t suffer,when moonbeam raises taxes on working class.
Too bad Gov. Moonbeam didn’t go to Jonestown with Rev.JimJones.
It’s ironic that politicians, lawmakers, judges, governors, mayors - even presidential candidates are out there happily telling us that the law shouldn’t matter.
If the law doesn’t matter: what do we need any of these people for?
Maryland is trying to do this. I’m glad the Gov isn’t ok with the democrats in office trying to push it hard. He’s planning to block it, but it’s hard to say how things will turn out.
Let them fly out. Then revoke their passports.
If you really want their attention, cut Medicaid or highway funds to those states.
My Arizona drivers license states that it is not valid for Federal ID; i.e., TSA. Supposedly, TSA will start to enforce this in a couple of years. So, why should a drivers license from California be accepted by TSA?!
My Arizona drivers license states that it is not valid for Federal ID”????
My AZ license was issued in 2009 and has NO SUCH Restrictions or Language on it and expires in 2025
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.