Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco bars travel to South Dakota for city employees
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | March 20, 2017

Posted on 03/20/2017 6:20:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower

South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; keepowt; liberalfascism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
I was going to make a comment about San Francisco gays not being able to visit the Corn Palace but good taste prevented me.
1 posted on 03/20/2017 6:20:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

No doubt S. Dakota is crying in their beers

SF won’t send their queers


2 posted on 03/20/2017 6:21:59 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW! BOYCOTT Mexico nba NFL PepsiCO Kellogg's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Less AIDS flying in to South Dakota!


3 posted on 03/20/2017 6:22:16 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Please check out TheCitizensAudit.com to find out what David Brock has been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

They’re trying to protect children? The outrage! San Francisco won’t stand for it.


4 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:02 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Idiots from San Fernasco have no business in South Dakota anyway. Those boys have guns up there.


5 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:32 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I think South Dakota may be on to something here.


6 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:38 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Do San Fagciscans realize that South Dakota residents don’t want them there anyway?


7 posted on 03/20/2017 6:24:16 PM PDT by akalinin (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Soon the californicators may be illegal immigrants anyway.


8 posted on 03/20/2017 6:25:32 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

If only SD could find a way to influence MN.


9 posted on 03/20/2017 6:26:59 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I’m sure the good people of South Dakota appreciate San Francisco’s effort to minimize the travel of undesirables to their state.


10 posted on 03/20/2017 6:27:01 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best long term prep for conservatives: have big families & outproduce muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

How much city business or city travel is there, between South Dakota and San Francisco, in the first place?? It’s just a meaningless boycott.

Remember a few years ago, when Los Angeles decided to boycott Arizona over Arizona’s tough illegal alien law???

When it was discovered that LA gets about 25% of their electricity from Arizona, they decided to rescind their boycott of Arizona over the illegal immigration law.

In other words, the liberals will do these boycotts if it doesn’t involve any real sacrifice on their part. In the case of LA, the thought of rolling blackouts and/or sitting in the stifling heat of an LA summer, to make a political statement, was too much for the LA city council to contemplate. They were willing to boycott Arizona only if it didn’t mean any real sacrifice on the part of LA.


11 posted on 03/20/2017 6:28:27 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Understand that the state of CA does not bar travel to Cuba or any Muslim country.


12 posted on 03/20/2017 6:39:11 PM PDT by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Where are the National Cornhole Championships held?


13 posted on 03/20/2017 6:39:33 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why would anyone who is a city employee in San Francisco need to go to South Dakota on the taxpayer’s dime - or any other place for that matter?


14 posted on 03/20/2017 6:41:52 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Same place the International Fudge Packing Competition is held.


15 posted on 03/20/2017 6:48:56 PM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

South Dakota is happier than a pig in sh*t!


16 posted on 03/20/2017 6:49:25 PM PDT by Road Warrior 04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“Fagnanistan”.


17 posted on 03/20/2017 6:50:10 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (****happy dance**** BIGLY!!!! Shadilay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Now if we could just get every state to pass something that would cause the prudes in SF to bar their employees travel to their states we could keep the, well, whatever they are in their own back yard.


18 posted on 03/20/2017 6:50:15 PM PDT by Boomer (The modern day leftist dems are the party of criminally insane propagandists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.

No doubt every South Dakotan is completely devastated at this turn of events. ;-)
19 posted on 03/20/2017 6:53:57 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

And this is bad...why?


20 posted on 03/20/2017 6:54:00 PM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson