Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco bars travel to South Dakota for city employees
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | March 20, 2017

Posted on 03/20/2017 6:20:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower

South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; keepowt; liberalfascism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last
I was going to make a comment about San Francisco gays not being able to visit the Corn Palace but good taste prevented me.
1 posted on 03/20/2017 6:20:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

No doubt S. Dakota is crying in their beers

SF won’t send their queers


2 posted on 03/20/2017 6:21:59 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat ("Liberalism is a mental disorder" On FULL Display NOW! BOYCOTT Mexico nba NFL PepsiCO Kellogg's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Less AIDS flying in to South Dakota!


3 posted on 03/20/2017 6:22:16 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Please check out TheCitizensAudit.com to find out what David Brock has been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

They’re trying to protect children? The outrage! San Francisco won’t stand for it.


4 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:02 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Idiots from San Fernasco have no business in South Dakota anyway. Those boys have guns up there.


5 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:32 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I think South Dakota may be on to something here.


6 posted on 03/20/2017 6:23:38 PM PDT by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Do San Fagciscans realize that South Dakota residents don’t want them there anyway?


7 posted on 03/20/2017 6:24:16 PM PDT by akalinin (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Soon the californicators may be illegal immigrants anyway.


8 posted on 03/20/2017 6:25:32 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

If only SD could find a way to influence MN.


9 posted on 03/20/2017 6:26:59 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I’m sure the good people of South Dakota appreciate San Francisco’s effort to minimize the travel of undesirables to their state.


10 posted on 03/20/2017 6:27:01 PM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (Best long term prep for conservatives: have big families & outproduce muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

How much city business or city travel is there, between South Dakota and San Francisco, in the first place?? It’s just a meaningless boycott.

Remember a few years ago, when Los Angeles decided to boycott Arizona over Arizona’s tough illegal alien law???

When it was discovered that LA gets about 25% of their electricity from Arizona, they decided to rescind their boycott of Arizona over the illegal immigration law.

In other words, the liberals will do these boycotts if it doesn’t involve any real sacrifice on their part. In the case of LA, the thought of rolling blackouts and/or sitting in the stifling heat of an LA summer, to make a political statement, was too much for the LA city council to contemplate. They were willing to boycott Arizona only if it didn’t mean any real sacrifice on the part of LA.


11 posted on 03/20/2017 6:28:27 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Understand that the state of CA does not bar travel to Cuba or any Muslim country.


12 posted on 03/20/2017 6:39:11 PM PDT by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Where are the National Cornhole Championships held?


13 posted on 03/20/2017 6:39:33 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why would anyone who is a city employee in San Francisco need to go to South Dakota on the taxpayer’s dime - or any other place for that matter?


14 posted on 03/20/2017 6:41:52 PM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Same place the International Fudge Packing Competition is held.


15 posted on 03/20/2017 6:48:56 PM PDT by redfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

South Dakota is happier than a pig in sh*t!


16 posted on 03/20/2017 6:49:25 PM PDT by Road Warrior 04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

“Fagnanistan”.


17 posted on 03/20/2017 6:50:10 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (****happy dance**** BIGLY!!!! Shadilay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
Now if we could just get every state to pass something that would cause the prudes in SF to bar their employees travel to their states we could keep the, well, whatever they are in their own back yard.


18 posted on 03/20/2017 6:50:15 PM PDT by Boomer (The modern day leftist dems are the party of criminally insane propagandists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
South Dakota has landed on San Francisco's list of places where city workers aren't allowed to go on official business because the state passed a law allowing religious-affiliated adoption agencies to not place children with unmarried or same-sex couples.

No doubt every South Dakotan is completely devastated at this turn of events. ;-)
19 posted on 03/20/2017 6:53:57 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

And this is bad...why?


20 posted on 03/20/2017 6:54:00 PM PDT by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Totalitarianism. Exhibit #43351156 brought to you by the Left.


21 posted on 03/20/2017 6:59:25 PM PDT by SueRae (An administration like no other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Well the good thing about this is that the gay Mafia have revealed their true intentions, that they don’t believe there should be ANY exceptions made for people of conscience, ever. Just wait until nanny & sitter services are pressured to kick out parents who don’t want sodomite nannies and sitters in their own private homes!

Tolerance = embrace our cause, or else


22 posted on 03/20/2017 6:59:59 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

There are a lot of former Minnesota businesses relocated to South Dakota.


23 posted on 03/20/2017 7:05:20 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

And, there are several reasons for that.


24 posted on 03/20/2017 7:10:13 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

ROFLOL!


25 posted on 03/20/2017 7:11:14 PM PDT by defconw (The long national nightmare is over! Praise God! Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

We live in South Dakota. Read blub to Husband. He said, Good!


26 posted on 03/20/2017 7:12:16 PM PDT by defconw (The long national nightmare is over! Praise God! Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Girls too! ;)


27 posted on 03/20/2017 7:13:07 PM PDT by defconw (The long national nightmare is over! Praise God! Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

South Dakota and other right thinking states ought ban travel to San Francisco merely on the basis of the danger to the public health.


28 posted on 03/20/2017 7:15:25 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Yup! :o)


29 posted on 03/20/2017 7:16:14 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I love my state.


30 posted on 03/20/2017 7:19:20 PM PDT by defconw (The long national nightmare is over! Praise God! Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Dang right!


31 posted on 03/20/2017 7:20:43 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I tried being reasonable, I didn't like it. - Clint Eastwood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Hmmmm. I think I’ll start a letter writing campaign to our state reps demanding the same bathroom laws as SD.


32 posted on 03/20/2017 7:23:03 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

OK, so why would a San Francisco employee go to South Dakota for government business in the first place?

And frankly, why would anybody in South Dakota want someone from San Francisco visiting?


33 posted on 03/20/2017 7:24:31 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

That’s marriage laws you idiot. Not bathroom laws.


34 posted on 03/20/2017 7:26:13 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Oh how I wish California would ban any of their people from leaving that ‘illegal alien’ State, do us all a favor...if you like California and the way it is, please stay there, we don’t need your ‘insane ideas’ spreading around America...


35 posted on 03/20/2017 7:30:01 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

However they do travel on junkets to countries like China where there are no gay rights at all.


36 posted on 03/20/2017 7:30:27 PM PDT by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Talk about a great side effect to a law. Sounds like another great reason to pass this law everywhere. If this is all takes to keep these creeps away from your state that’s a win.


37 posted on 03/20/2017 7:30:30 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Why do South Dakota city employees want to work in San Franscisco Bars? I’m confused, maybe I should read the article naw!


38 posted on 03/20/2017 7:34:17 PM PDT by datricker (Democratic Party - aborting their voter base since 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defconw

I agree. We do not want them here.


39 posted on 03/20/2017 7:51:44 PM PDT by Rushmore Rocks (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower
San Francisco bars travel to South Dakota for city employees

I guess South Dakota bars aren't diverse enough for San Francisco city employees.

40 posted on 03/20/2017 7:54:16 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Seems mute. Can’t imagine why a city employee would need to go to SD on city business. But, hey, the Gay Bay is all about AtTeNtIoN.


41 posted on 03/20/2017 8:08:30 PM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Taxes, regulations, people with a work ethic. I’ve heard the radio ads when living in Minnesota.
I wound up moving my business to Texas no thanks to Crazy Eyes Dayton. According to Minnesota leftards I wasn’t welcome there anyway. Not drinking the Obama Kool Aid put me on the same level as the same level as the Klan (never mind the fact that the Klan was a DEMOCRAT outfit).


42 posted on 03/20/2017 8:29:44 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek

Come back when we retake the state.

OK, it’s going to be a while.

God bless you for making the right move to Texas.


43 posted on 03/20/2017 8:32:31 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I thought the title said Frisco bars travel to South Dakota. I thought that made sense that they’d need to drug South Dakotans to get them to accept that hideousness.


44 posted on 03/20/2017 9:07:01 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I don’t your average San Francisco resident could find South Dakota on the map if it wasn’t for the pipeline protests.


45 posted on 03/20/2017 9:21:58 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Well, I don’t think we should let our dollars travel to San Francisco, either! So there!


46 posted on 03/20/2017 9:33:43 PM PDT by Vesparado (The American people know what they want and they deserve to get it good and hard --- HL Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

That’s right - if you work in San Francisco - you only have the freedoms and rights that they say you should have.

If it were me, I’d get another job. (Well, if it were me, I wouldn’t be working in that town, anyway.)

SF was my father’s (RIP) favorite town till the thought police destroyed it.


47 posted on 03/20/2017 9:46:55 PM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The only San Franciscans who would go to So. Dakota are those fleeing Sodom and Gomorrah. Or the S.F. Vietnam veterans who would go to piss on George McGovern’s grave.

If I go, I’m drinking a gallon of hot tea on the way. I’ll show old Comrade George what real “Yellow Rain” feels like.


48 posted on 03/20/2017 10:43:35 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Headline sounds like San Francisco bars can’t go to North Dakota. No Beers on Wheels for them.


49 posted on 03/20/2017 11:29:13 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rushmore Rocks

Just have to hope our small percentage of rat pockets don’t get their wittle feelings hurt, and do something stupid!


50 posted on 03/21/2017 2:28:57 AM PDT by defconw (The long national nightmare is over! Praise God! Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson