Lou Dobbs said tonight that the persons involved in unmasking Gen Flynn in his intercepted transcript will be revealed next week by one of the investigations. Called it very big.
I hate waiting.
Well now. That interests me. Did you get the sense he knows who did it? Lou gets worked up but usually doesn’t hype (ala Maddow) actual stories.
There are so many games being played, very tough to even know who’s on first.
Lou Dobbs said tonight that the persons involved in unmasking Gen Flynn in his intercepted transcript will be revealed next week by one of the investigations. Called it very big.
Good.
I’m getting tired if this interception/leak/traitor cr@pola.
There seems to be an investigation by two investigative journalists (yes, real journalists), Sara Carter and another one, who have been reporting on Hannity about something big they are working on with their contacts in the intelligence community. There’s something, confusing to me, about the possibility being investigated that a server in the US may be falsely creating pings that appear to be sent from that Russian bank to Trump Tower. Apparently, the technology is definitely there, but they are investigating if it was used to create this scandal.
Dobbs’ comment fits right in with this.
This goes back to the campaign when “Russian contacts” was originally put out there by dems and was determined to be just pings and nothing else - no data generated. Some democrat insisted they take another look with the same result.
Apparently, now the Russian bank IT people have requested that this be investigated more thoroughly and deeply since those pings NEVER came from them; hence it’s now being investigated from a different standpoint. Interesting for sure. I want to go to Hannity’s site and watch those interviews again since it really is confusing to me.