Sure hope Breitbart is correct or Trump will look bad.
he’s POTUS. relying on BB when you have the power of the executive branch to inform you (or disprove, for that matter) of something like this would be . . . well, not the way to go about it.
I hardly think some two-bit blogger got to ask Trump what his source of info was.
Fake news.
That winning glow from Tuesday’s Joint Congress Address seems so so long ago!
After the trouble with Michael Flynn, it was tough to see Sessions cave to pressure to recuse himself
Then, the epitome of a squeaky clean politician, Veep Mike Pence, of all people, winds up with an email brouhaha.
Moreover, Don, Jr. has been reported to have accepted speaking fees from a French think tank whose founder and his wife are allies of the Russian government in efforts to end the war in Syria according to a Wall Street Journal story.
Furthermore, I heard/saw an item on one of the news channels today where Don, Jr., boasted about how money was pouring in from Russia. I believe this was from the Financial Times back in 2008.
Our great President has so many issues to focus on to MAGA!!!
It’s a damn shame that all of this maelstrom continues to swirl around him and his administration!!!
Praying that heads are rolling tonight down in Mar-a-Lago!!!
Enough of all this obstruction, resistance and myriad fake news, etc!!!
Umm...he’s the prez of the US...he’s going to KNOW what was going on. which explains the furor and ferocity of the whole “russian” meme...they were trying to justify tapping his phones in order to find political dirt on him.
Bloomberg’s denounced Trump as a “dangerous demagogue” and a “risky, reckless, and radical choice.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/bloombergs-case-against-trump/493367/
Bkmrk.
Report says Bloomberg relied on Soros for his allegations.
Sure hope Soros is correct or Bloomberg will look bad.
Three pixies from Bloomberg. LOL! Okay.
Bloomberg has a vested interest in it being so. Doesn’t make it so. He’s a RINO at least and a Uniparty at best.
Not part of the solution - part of the problem.
Fox just reported that an Obama Admin source confirmed wiretapping occurred.
Trump made this wild accusation today, but has no proof. Now, lets talk about the deep ties between Trump's campaign and the Russians who hacked the election.
I thought it was Obama who always days he knew nothing about a subject until he read it in the paper?
Hee, hee, hee! Sure he did.
It is called “plausible cover”. You wait until something that could also observe the event to happen to use as the public reason. During the North African campaign the Ultra SIGINT reported a ship movement that needed to be countered without revealing the source. A patrol airplane “accidentally” flew beyond its no return point to observe the task force and radio back the location.
Lol...nope!
Trump has the “intelligence community” at his beck-and-call, but you seriously believe he would not bother consulting with them and act on something he read on the Interwebs?
“Seriesly?”