Posted on 02/23/2017 10:14:22 AM PST by Kaslin
I write these words burning with indignation in light of the truly sick, pro-pederasty comments that have surfaced in recent days. Will the left discipline two of its beloved stars, George Takei of Star Trek fame and Bill Maher of HBO renown, for their horrifying comments the same way the right disciplined Milo Yiannopoulos for his?
As a result of some of Milos past comments getting more exposure, he was uninvited from speaking at CPAC, his book contract with Simon & Schuster was cancelled, and he resigned from being a senior editor at Breitbart (by his own choice, but obviously under duress). And all this happened despite Milo having a track record of exposing pedophiles and denouncing pedophilia, as he emphasized in his press conference on Tuesday.
Still, his lighthearted comments about being abused by a priest at the age of 13, along with other inappropriate remarks, were inexcusable and harmful, as he himself acknowledged, and it is right that he has suffered these penalties.
As for CPAC and Simon & Schuster and Breitbart, had they not responded decisively to Milos comments, their reputations would have been tarnished. (It was the conservative imprint of Simon & Schuster that had contracted Milos book.)
What will the left do now that George Takeis pro-pederast comments on the Howard Stern show have surfaced, comments perhaps far worse than Milos? And how will the left respond to Bill Mahers pro-pederast comments, certainly the worst of all?
This is the relevant text of Takeis 2006 interview on Howard Stern as he described what happened to him at a summer camp when he was just 13:
Howard Stern: How were you alone? Its summer camp.
George Takei: We were in the cabin.
Stern: And where were the other boys?
Takei: They were off hiking or something.
Robin Quivers: Doing little boy things.
Stern: Do you think subconsciously you stayed behind because you wanted to be alone with him [the 19-year-old-camp counselor]?
Takei: No, there was some kind of reason why I had to be there.
[…]
Stern: And he sat down and he touched you… Were you molested in a sense, because you were 13?
Takei: No, no. Cause I was kind of, you know—well, I thought he was pretty attractive.
Quivers: And you wanted to know why you felt this way.
Takei: Yes.
[…]
Quivers: Now wait a moment. He starts touching you how?
Stern: I dont know if I need to hear all this.
Quivers: Does he put a hand on your knee? Or does he put his arm around your shoulder?
Takei: He puts his arm around my shoulders.
Stern: Oh yeah.
Takei: Then he started, you know, touching the private parts.
Robin Quivers: Ahh! Was he gazing into your eyes the whole time? Was he saying anything?
Takei: Oh, he was telling me about, you know, how life works.
[Takei then explains in detail what took place sexually between them.]
Takei: It was both wonderful and scary and kind of intimidating, and delightful. I mean, all those opposites.
To every parent and grandparent reading these words, think about a 19-year-old camp counselor, supposedly a trustworthy figure, doing this to your 13-year-old child. Is your blood boiling like mine is? And how do you feel about Takeis positive description of it all?
Despite this interview, which was certainly not done in the closet (no pun intended), Takei has become a major voice in LGBT activism, and to my knowledge, there was no uproar after the interview aired. And how common are events like this in the gay community, providing an entry way into an active homosexual lifestyle? (More on this subject shortly in a forthcoming article; for now, see here and here.) Milo has every right to call-out the double standards.
As for Bill Maher, Joe Concha reports on The Hill that, A video surfaced Wednesday showing HBO Real Time host Bill Maher condoning a sexual relationship between a 35-year-old female teacher and a 12-year-old male student that resulted in the woman getting pregnant twice before eventually being jailed.
What makes this all the more ironic is that Maher has taken credit for the fall of Milo, and now the accuser finds himself accused, and rightly so.
As Concha notes, in the 1998 clip from his ABC show Politically Incorrect, Maher was referring to the story of a woman named Mary Kay Letourneau who was impregnated twice by student Vili Fualaau, starting when he was 12.
Of this abusive relationship he said, The teacher from Seattle is in jail because she is in love. Thats how I view it.
He continued, I admit that its unorthodox. Shes 35, the boy is 14. He was younger when they started. But she is pregnant again. That was the story this week. This is the second child by this boy. They are keeping the mother in jail because she wont conform to what society feels should be the perfect American family.
These are sick, sick comments reflecting sick, sick morals, and if there are not substantial penalties for these comments even 19 years later then Milo would be completely vindicated in claiming that the attacks against him (as an openly gay conservative) were nothing more than a cynical media witch hunt from people who dont care about children.
So, what will the media do now, the same media that wanted to crucify Milo for his inexcusable comments?
If it fails to act in a clear and concerted way, it will only expose its own moral bankruptcy. Or perhaps, even more revealingly, it will demonstrate that strong morals are only expected from the right, not the left.
We shall see.
They are no different than John Podesta and his ‘spirit cooking’...
After these revelations, I would not be surprised if Bill Maher gets fired from Politically Incorrect and George Takei is never on another other episode of Star Trek.
All of these people are unworthy of the life God gave them.Sick demented scum that seek to perpetuate their rotton lifestyle in others.
Nope.
“And whosoever shall cause harm to these little ones, it were better that a great millstone be hung around his neck, and he be drowned in the depths of the sea.”
I don’t think these people have any idea of the troubles they will have brought upon themselves.
What an ugly-a$$ hag. He obviously has immunity due to his membership in one of America’s certified victim groups.
Simple answer, no. The right polices it’s own, the left, not so much.
So both Milo and George were molested by adult males when they were 13-year-old boys.
So were they “born this way” or were they “groomed”? Because there seems to be a pattern here.
I don’t think they were born to be molested. They were most likely groomed that way, because they were molested.
Very very creepy. The eye that alters, alters all. (W. Blake) These warped people need to be in counseling centers and deprogrammed.
True. They are revealing that their “Born that Way” is a complete fraud. All their “gender theory Marxist cr@p is a Big Lie. No child is born lusting after anal cavities or organs or goats unless they are severely abused and neglected and conditioned.
All homosexuals have been abused, neglected and seduced into an evil, vile, meaningless “lifestyle” which is using others in dehumanizing ways-—as a Means to an End (Marxism).
Promoting homosexuality and gender confusion should (like in Russia) be against the law. Only Truth should be allowed in the schools and NO grooming into these vile, degrading acts. (Sex Ed needs to be banned—only Biology class like pre-70s when out of wedlock births and fornication were much more rare—as STDs, etc., since only Christian Ethics were taught in the schools, not satanism like into today’s schools (big lies and disinformation).
Obviously, I didn’t mean that they were born to be molested. I meant “born this way” as in born homosexual, which is what the LGBT activists usually claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.