Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal Publishes “Fake News” Gets Rebuked by ODNI…

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | 2/16/2017 | sundance

[Lazamataz]

The ridiculous scope of the undermining anti-Trump media narrative is growing exponentially more stupid as the content of their “stories” never match the alarmist headlines they are attempting.

The latest example from Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal is so over-the-top ridiculous, even the Office of the Director of National Intelligence rebuked it publicly.

The Wall Street Journal leads with a headline: “Spies Keep Intelligence From Donald Trump on Leak Concerns”… (there might be a paywall, so we’ll screen grab the lead)

[Lazamataz]

Original FAKE NEWS:

[nikos1121]

Have you noticed that almost invariably WHENEVER there an article, of dubious content, is written by two or more authors, it’s pure fake news.

[smartymarty]

With all due respect, Mr. Mataz, your tagline is lacking the word perverted.

[Wuli]

Before Murdoch acquired Dow Jones, Inc., which includes the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the WSJ provided a reasonable alternative, politically, to the print versions of the LameStreamMedia (NYTimes, WashPost, LATimes, BostGlobe, ect) as well as a news alternative to the TV venues of the LameSTreetMedia led by ABC, CBS, CNBC, CNN, MSNBC, NBC & NPR.

After acquisition by Murdoch and the appointment of his Liberal son over Dow Jones, the WSJ gradually became, politically, a full fledged member of the LameStreamMedia on all its primary news pages. There remained a modicum of Conservative views among the editors of the WSJ opinion page, which was not a “discrepancy”. The prior owners of Dow Jones, in their agreement to sell to Murdoch, retained control of the editorial board of the WSJ opinion page.

The rest of the paper has been on a politically slow downhill slide into the editorial arms and control of Leftists and all their political agendas.

[Garth Tater]

Before Murdoch acquired Dow Jones, Inc., which includes the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), the WSJ provided a reasonable alternative, politically, to the print versions of the LameStreamMedia

They've always been nothing more than paid mouth pieces of the powers-that-be. In 1986 the WSJ lied through their teeth about the benefits of the Simpson-Mazzoli Immigration Act in their news pages and almost daily in their editorial pages. I learned a lot about who runs this country from that treachery.

[Wuli]

Yes, in the area of immigration, the WSJ editorial page, going back a long ways, has been least Conservative compared to many other matters. I think I know why, but to say it I’d be flamed as prejudiced, religiously, though I think the truth is the opposite, that one religion above all others in American has pushed the open borders theme.

[Garth Tater]

in the area of immigration, the WSJ editorial page, going back a long ways, has been least Conservative compared to many other matters.

If they will lie to us about immigration in support of their owners' agenda they can never be trusted to tell us the truth about anything else. While much of their reporting and editorializing will be truthful - if the order comes down to them to take a dishonest position on an issue they will immediately put their best sophists to work on deceiving us.

In my opinion the WSJ is even more dangerous to us than the obvious liars at the more left-wing media corporations. They are all owned by the same globalist cabal but the right-wing liars like those at the WSJ are better positioned to deceive us.

I think I know why...

I think they are pushing unfettered 3rd world immigration into 1st world western nations to weaken them and clear the way for their imposition of slavery upon us through their NWO subterfuge. The WSJ hides behind immigration being good for the nation but if that were their honest opinion they would be willing to discuss the negative consequences of the massive illegal immigration this nation has experienced over the last 50 years and then discuss and balance the two sides of the issue, but they never allow this negative side of the story to appear in their paper.

...but to say it I’d be flamed as prejudiced, religiously

I don't think the ethnically jewish families that make up the greatest portion of the NWO cabal are at all religious - they may or may not be satanists, I have no knowledge of that, or even an opinion on the matter - but I do know that the ethnicity of virtually all the owners of the major media and financial corporation in the western world is jewish.