White House Releases Secret List of 24 Refugees Charged With Terrorism from Targeted Regimes

thegatewaypundit ^ | Jim Hoft

[davikkm]

FOX Business revealed a federal list of 24 refugees charged with terrorism from the seven nations listed as terror states in the recent executive order.

Senator Jeff Sessions compiled a list of refugees-turned-jihadists in 2016 while Obama was pushing to dramatically increase the amount of so-called “refugees” allowed into the United States.

[davikkm]

This is win win for Trump ...If the 9th circuit rules for Trump he wins if they rule against him the Dems AND those judges OWN all terrorism in the US from here on out and we win EVERY single election for a decade

[blueyon]

“This is win win for Trump ...If the 9th circuit rules for Trump he wins if they rule against him the Dems AND those judges OWN all terrorism in the US from here on out and we win EVERY single election for a decade”

EXACTLY

[New Jersey Realist]

Let me ask a stupid question. Why didn’t the DOJ do that before Sessions stepped in? There’s gonna be a whole lotta firing going on. Especially that idiot lawyer that represented the government; they scraped the bottom of the barrel for that turd.

[Diogenesis]

The 9th circuit clowns are the 4th branch of a criminal
“government”.

Those ‘blackrobes’ lie freely.

Those ‘blackrobes’ practice sedition

They are NOT the Commander-in-Chief, but are
agents of al Qaeda.

[bray]

Looks like the DNC is helping ISIS get into America. Nice to see a real AG at work cleaning the swamp.

Pray America is waking

[monkeyshine]

If it was released it isn’t a secret.

[SkyPilot]

Trump had been playing a rare game of defense since the wack job, BLM loving, pro-bono "migrant" legal serving, liberal judge in Seattle ruled against Trump's legal travel ban.

Yes, Trump is smart, brilliant even.

But he isn't God, and sometimes he makes tactical errors. This was one of them. He should have waited for Jeff Sessions to be confirmed before issuing the order.

But in the last couple of days, Trump is on full offense again. He sensed the danger (we all did), and the loss of momentum towards his entire agenda.

Reading the statute before the police officers, on television, was brilliant.

I watched Fox News, and the journalists were lamenting that Trump "showed contempt for judges." Screw these judges. Trump is correct, they ARE political, and it has to stop.

The 9th Circus was supposed to rule yesterday. My take is they had to delay, because issuing their totally illegal and illogical "ruling" on the same day Trump smacked them down would have been too embarrassing.

[SJackson]

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

[eartick]

With this knowledge, President Trump should have ignored the whacko judge's orders. Protect America.

Something is up. A deal has been brokered.

[AndyJackson]

He sensed the danger (we all did), and the loss of momentum towards his entire agenda.

Let's be clear. The loss of momentum was because the spineless turtle setting the senate calendar tried to whine about democratic stalling tactics rather than dealing with them. It took a blast from many of us writing and calling our senators to get things moving again. The old - I can't do anything - oh, what did you say, what's our cut here - the obstructionist democrats are blocking our "conservative" agenda shit has deserved all of these clowns a prompt retirement.

That the republicans are even there any more is because Trump ran and because he told his supporters he actually needed the votes that their lazy asses are sitting on.

[AndyJackson]

Trump "showed contempt for judges

There is an important legal point here. The judges showed utter contempt for the office of the president in particular in issuing and then standing by a broad TRO against the actions of a president.

There are only four legal questions here:
Did the President have the discretion to act?
Did the President exercise that discretion?
Did the president do so for a valid reason?
Did he do so in good faith?

While the Trial Judge, on his own, tried to question this last, the presumption is that a pubic official, any public offiial, is exercising his duties in good faith, a deference especially owed the president.

Yes, the presumption is rebuttable, but the plaintiff moonbat liberals and crony capitalists had the burden to do so with clear evidence.

It isn't the President's job to do so, or to answer, until moonbat and crony-capitalist complainants have made their case.

[Travis McGee]

[Real Cynic No More]

... the journalists were lamenting that Trump "showed contempt for judges.

Well, didn't he merely point out how contemptible they really are?

[pfony1]

I agree. Reading the law in its simple, plain English was brilliant!

I noticed that the word “...finds...” was NOT preceded by the word “...reasonably...” in that law.

THEREFORE, any lawyer’s argument that the President’s 90-day suspension was, in that lawyer’s view,”unreasonable” is, as Perry Mason used to say, “...irrelevant, incompetent and immaterial...”!

[DaveA37]

If we have crooked judges, remove them.

[DrDude]

Why can’t Trump issue another order and/or Proclamtion? He can issue the same exact order and it would have to be litigated all over again. Perhaps modify the order to exclude everyone from anywhere that is not a US Citizen. No discriminaton. Sound practice for National Security.

[jokemoke]

“secret” Really??? Then why did they release it?

[Eddie01]

...and they sure are taking their time.

The entire nation and world are watching this decision.

What was a slam dunk deision to legislate from the bench now has gravity shifting political ramifications.

They are not considering the law at all. Instead, they are in chambers debating the impact to the 2018 elections and beyond. They are judging the level of American voter understanding of the statute granting the POTUS the authority to do exactly what Trump did.

Trumps tweets have the corrupt 9th circus court tied up in knots.

[alancarp]

They are stalling while trying desperately to come up with some form of legal logic twist to justify supporting Robarts. This panel can certainly read and interpret plain English... the problem for them may be that the English is too plain and obvious to even the casual observer.