Statistics which Suggest significant voter fraud in California (Vanity)

February 3,2017 | Ednamode

[EdnaMode]

Without fraud, the only other explanation is that millions of conservatives and moderates moved out of the state, and that the huge majority of people who moved there since 2000 are liberals.

[meyer]

...and that the huge majority of people who moved there since 2000 are liberals.

Well, they are mostly liberals. Mexican liberals.

[meyer]

Clinton won CA by 29%. WHo would risk 10 years in jail to make it 29.000001%?

Clinton MIGHT have won CA by 10%. Voter fraud at a massive level made it 29%, and likely brought a few other seats to the 'rats at both the state and federal level.

[9YearLurker]

Simple: they are overwhelmingly illegals.

[EdnaMode]

I really hope that voter ID laws are passed in time for the 2018 and 2020 elections.

[Armando Guerra]

Good work. The Democrats, media and soon to be published school history books will all tout that Clinton won the popular vote by 2,864,974 votes (never mind that the statistic is not relevant with the electoral college being the determining factor) in their drive to delegitimize Trump and his mandate. Of that vote margin, California had Clinton up 4,269,978 votes meaning Trump won the rest of the country by 1,405,004. The left squealed like stuck pigs with claims of voter fraud stating there was no evidence. Your numbers, particularly the wide variance with liberal states like Illinois and New York, show a statistical anomaly that is not easily explained. I verified your numbers with the California Secretary of State. I counted the total number of votes cast for President to have increased by 3,467,666 votes since 2000 if you count all the candidates and yet Trump had 83,619 votes less than Bush. Yes, in California I would expect a large percentage to have gone for Hillary but those numbers are dubious at best. The statistical improbability of that is sufficient evidence to warrant an investigation of California voting. If the Trump administration does begin an investigation, I predict a fire that will conveniently destroy all of California’s 2016 voting records.

[Rebelrage]

All goaded on by the left stupidly bringing up the issue of voter fraud lmao!

[InterceptPoint]

Ping.

[EdnaMode]

Thank you. I was really curious to look at the numbers from those three states especially after the left kept saying that Hillary won the “popular vote.” And it’s definitely suspicious that Trump would have fewer votes than Bush when the total number of votes increased by over 3.4 million. Thanks for providing those numbers, it’s quite interesting.

[eyeamok]

100% of the “New” people in California are Illegal Aliens, there are numerous studies showing that Citizens left and peasants came.

I guarantee over 1 Million Illegals Voted in the last election, just in SoCal.

[Obsidian]

There are a couple reasons why it would be and is worth it for dems to engage in widescale electoral fraud even in a very safe state, esp one like CA which no other state matches in terms of sheer, vast numbers--it given them their much touted popular vote argument, which they use to try to deprive the electoral vote winner (GWB and Trump) legitimacy and a mandate; and also to push for national popular vote presidential elections.

Both are damaging; and if dems ever get their way, all it will take is for a few mega-cities to swing the entire election, which they'd love cause it's much easier to cheat in a few highly populated cities they are in charge of, instead of cheating in numerous cities in numerous states, some of which they don't control. Taking it to extremes, if the Electiral College were gone, a Republican could then narrowly win 49 states...yet lose the election when the dem wins CA by a vast margin!