Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House votes to overturn Obama drilling rule
thehill.com ^ | 2/3/17 | Devin Henry

Posted on 02/03/2017 8:50:24 AM PST by ColdOne

House votes to overturn Obama drilling rule

The House on Friday passed a resolution to reverse a pollution rule for oil and natural gas drillers that was put in place by the Obama administration.

Members voted 221-191 to approve a Congressional Review Act resolution against the Bureau of Land Management’s methane venting and flaring rule. If approved by the Senate and signed by President Trump, the rule would come off the books for good.

Republicans and the oil industry say the rule would hinder energy production on federal lands by restricting drilling, costing jobs as well as tax and royalty payments for state and local governments.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: drillingrule; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 02/03/2017 8:50:24 AM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

More Winning!


2 posted on 02/03/2017 8:53:02 AM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

WINNING AND WINNING— Don’t stop!!


3 posted on 02/03/2017 8:53:29 AM PST by WENDLE (We need to move forward on our 100 new federal judges ASAP .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Before Trump leaves office this sort of thing needs to be nipped in the bud for good.

Agencies shouldn’t be able to make up “rules” on the fly that literally take a law passed by congress and signed by the president to repeal.


4 posted on 02/03/2017 8:54:00 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Make America Great Again !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Seems to me a “rule” isn’t a duly executed federal statute. At most, the agency which concocted the rule should be under control of the executive branch which could rescind it post haste.


5 posted on 02/03/2017 8:54:12 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Eco wanker heads ‘splodin’ all over the place. Uh oh. Bio-hazard clean up on aisle 7. STAT!


6 posted on 02/03/2017 8:54:58 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

We are not tired of winning yet, President Trump. Keep ‘em coming!


7 posted on 02/03/2017 8:55:35 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

And we thought they were nothing but worthless pussies.

Now we see that all they needed was a real man with a spine to herd them.


8 posted on 02/03/2017 9:00:22 AM PST by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 66 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Under current rules, any regulation that has gone beyond 60 legislative days since first published in the Federal Register must have a 60 or 90 days (not recalling which one) period before Congress where concerned parties may present their arguments in favor of or against repeal.

If that is done under the Congressional Review Act and the Congress approves, by vote, to allow the rescinding of the regulation at issue, by law that regulation can never again be issued by any future administration absent a congressional vote of approval.


9 posted on 02/03/2017 9:01:07 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Charlie, here comes the deuce, and when you speak of me speak well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

And if something works & it aint broke, don’t “fix”it. Leave it alone. Like lower taxes.


10 posted on 02/03/2017 9:01:44 AM PST by FES0844 (G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
......by law that regulation can never again be issued by any future administration absent a congressional vote of approval.

Then to me this process makes perfect sense. Thank you for illuminating us.

11 posted on 02/03/2017 9:03:13 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Luv it!


12 posted on 02/03/2017 9:04:11 AM PST by ColdOne (( I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Get back to us when the Senate & President signs the legislation. That’s when it counts.


13 posted on 02/03/2017 9:07:01 AM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Same here

A joint resolution would require senate and president approval. I thought a CRA resolution didn’t require senate and presidential approval.


14 posted on 02/03/2017 9:08:29 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Agencies shouldn’t be able to make up “rules” on the fly that literally take a law passed by congress and signed by the president to repeal.

This could be wrong, but the way I understand it is that the president and the agency could roll the rule back without the involvement of congress or the senate.

But the next democrat administration (if there ever is one) could just make the rule again.

However this action by congress, if it becomes a law, forbids any administration from making the same rule again.

Of course we all know that if democrats ever make it back into power they will create some sort of loophole and do what they want - the law be damned!


15 posted on 02/03/2017 9:08:39 AM PST by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 66 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
If approved by the Senate

Subject to filibuster?

16 posted on 02/03/2017 9:13:39 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

correct.

But what I am saying is..

we need to take this opportunity to end this practice once and for all.

Otherwise eventually another Democrat will be elected and they will start making up rules again. Rules that have the power of law... ARE LAWS. And agencies with a wink from the president shouldn’t have the power to create law.


17 posted on 02/03/2017 9:14:40 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Make America Great Again !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

There are already so many rules in place in layers.


18 posted on 02/03/2017 9:15:02 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

If approved by the Senate, need l say more?


19 posted on 02/03/2017 9:16:08 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The spokesperson for winning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ib3Y-Q3QnOk


20 posted on 02/03/2017 9:16:16 AM PST by waus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson