Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate advances DeVos's nomination, setting her up for final vote (52-48)
thehill ^ | February 3, 2017 | Jordan Carney

Posted on 02/03/2017 4:41:01 AM PST by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: abb

What? Collins can’t persuade Graham or McCain to vote against DeVos?


81 posted on 02/04/2017 1:41:47 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark
Not even Manchin of WV. Surprised on that one. Thought he had some sense.

No ... he's totally in the pocket of Big Labor, among other things. He's an 0bamorrhoid democRAT. Has a lot of people fooled, though.

82 posted on 02/04/2017 1:45:21 PM PST by NorthMountain (AP is fake news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donozark

You apparently missed all the talk of Manchin announcing last week that he is voting against her.


83 posted on 02/04/2017 5:15:18 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dave W

No. I didn’t miss it. But Manchin has been known to change his vote. More than once. And he is under pressure. From all sides...


84 posted on 02/04/2017 5:19:11 PM PST by donozark (Lock her up! Kick 'em out! Build the wall! GO TRUMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: pnz1
First, is party loyalty. Senators and Congressmen are expected to stick with their parties in procedural votes, regardless how their final vote goes. To go against your party in procedural votes is considered worse than if their final vote on legislation or nominees is against your party.

But publicly, they say they feel the nominee deserves an up or down vote on the floor of the Senate even if they are going to vote against the nominee.

85 posted on 02/04/2017 5:35:18 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cssGA30005
It's not going to happen. Reagan campaigned on that theme and there was never an effort to close it. Frankly, it is a political loser. Voters get very emotional about education and if Trump tried to close the department, all the stories on TV, papers, internet about how Trump hates education and it is going to hurt your child makes it a nonstarter.

The political price to pay is high. The pubs would be wiped out in Congress since the public does not understand.

Even though huge amounts of money are spent on education, the public never, ever, ever thinks it is enough.

I remember reading in the paper several years ago that they took a poll and almost 100% of the respondents did not think enough money was spent on schools. After they responded, the person taking the poll informed the respondent how much money is spent on schools, total, per student, etc. etc. They asked the same question to the same person and it went down to 50/50 thinking that not enough money was spent on schools.

If Trump wants to close the department, they will need to educate the country first as to the expense and how the department has hurt education before they do anything, but it will be a hard sell.

86 posted on 02/04/2017 5:43:58 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Understood. I did not know that. That is something that may make both sides angry. He must live a horrible life going through that in a lot of votes.


87 posted on 02/04/2017 5:50:45 PM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson