Posted on 12/15/2016 5:01:50 AM PST by Eleutheria5
Islamist front groups in Canada and the West have dragged the media and the political "elites" into their extremist messaging. Rather than learning about why extremism and terrorism come out of their religion, Islamists instead concentrate on preventing the victims of their violence from speaking out. They do this by shouting "Islamophobia" at every opportunity, and do so most loudly at modernist or secular Muslims.
The Parliament of Canada, for example, passed an "anti-Islamophobia" motion on October 26, 2016. Samer Majzoub, the president of the Canadian Muslim Forum, was the person behind the Parliamentary petition against "Islamophobia"; it generated some 70,000 signatures. The sponsor of the motion in the House of Commons was MP Frank Baylis.
Both Majzoub and the Canadian Muslim Forum have a rather long list of dubious connections to Islamist groups and the foreign money used to support them. This includes the Muslim Brotherhood.
What is the real intent of Samir Majzoub, the Canadian Muslim Forum and its exploitation of the over-hyped concept of "Islamophobia"? As noted, Islamists, including Majzoub, have a long history of dragging prominent people and organizations into their arguments about extremism, terrorism and radicalization. These Islamists do not use their influence to drain the resources of Islamic terrorism in Canada and elsewhere, nor do they seek to stop young Canadians from joining ISIS. They did not stop suicide bombers in Canada such as Aaron Driver or Calgary-based Salma Ashrafi, who became a suicide bomber in Iraq. They do not use their knowledge or money to dismantle the infrastructure of extremism, nor do they attempt to dismantle the historical and religious arguments in favor of terrorism. Rather than do any of this, they instead make it their priority to intimidate, harass or sue those who speak out against...
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at gatestoneinstitute.org ...
WHAT phobia???
I have no fear of Islam. I detest it. A deep seeded, roiling hatred.
What I do have is "Rancorphobia". For such a hatred does not sit well with my Lord and Creator. But I'm working on it.
Nothing phobogenic about that./sarc
Quit gunning down people who are not mussie’s.
The west is choking on their Muslims!
Islamophobia didn’t exist until well after 9-11. When the OKC Bombing happened the narrative was that anyone that spoke out against Islam was a “racist”. They tried this route until it was “discovered” Islam is not a race! Then they shifted gears and took up the narrative from the Gay Rights Movement where people had homophobia. They then started labeling their opponents with this and because of the homophobia label being thrown around then the Gay Rights Movement adopted it just enough for Islamophobia to get a foothold. Now if a mooslime doesn’t get their way they slap that label on you faster than a two-bit hooker will relieve you of your money. Islamophobia has been as fake as there two Tuesdays in a week. The left eats this up and voila! we have have an Islamaphobe.
If the left knew really what Islam stood for and they gave a iota about knowing that, they would ban Islam just like that European country recently did.
Mooslimes aren’t here to play the left’s game because when Islam gets the numbers and gets what it want it will run roughshod over them and everyone else. The Civil War between the south and north will look like a day at the spa if Islam gets a major foothold in the USA. 0Bummer was a trial run for them. Hitlary was supposed to be the end game. Now they will have to work on someone else.
“they would ban Islam just like that European country recently did.”
Which country?
Slovakia has banned Islam to be registered as a religion.
Islam causes destruction, slavery, oppression, terror, poverty everywhere since it existed. So “Islamophobia” is a normal reaction, nothing to be against it, much less legislate against it. Those you don’t recognize islamophobia as a normal reaction are stupid and/or insane.
Slovakia. Japan. Possible havens, should Trump and his movement fail or suffer tactical setbacks.
I know Angola as a country has banned Islam.
Slovakia passed a law on November 30 that bans Islam as an officially recognized religion.
The prime minister, Robert Fico, said in May that “Islam has no place” in Slovakia. Prior to the law being passed, Slovak National Party Chairman Andrej Danko said, “Islamization starts with a kebab and it’s already under way in Bratislava — let’s realize what we can face in 5 to 10 years.”
“We must do everything we can so that no mosque is built in the future,” said Danko.
http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/christian-slovakia-passes-law-ban-islam
I also see a problem with the new law:
“The new law says that a religion must have at least 50,000 members to qualify for state recognition; the previous threshold was 20,000 members. According to Slovakia’s latest census, as reported by Reuters, there are 2,000 Muslims there and ‘no recognized mosques.’”
To get 50,000 mooslimes in their country would not be that hard.
They need to up that figure by a 1000 fold.
How do you say “build a wall” in Slovak?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.