He is listed as a senior editor at The Atlantic. So this is not a freelance gig either. Why did he join this mag? After all, NRO and Weekly Standard are still around where he could usually feel quite comfortable. He could also find plenty of company in his circle of GOPe/NWO friends to bitch about Trump together.
If you’ve always been past the bend, you can’t go around it.
Frum’s surname has always amused me, given his current and past behavior. It means “pious” in Yiddish.
There’s a reason David Frum is called ‘The Frumtard’
STILL THE RNC SAYS: WE WERE NOT HACKED. ACCORDING TO THE FBI WHO ASSESSED THEIR SYSTEMS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION, THEY HAVE NEVER (EVER)BEEN HACKED.
The DNC was hacked, but it wasn’t Russia.
It’s just another excuse the LEFT is using to maintain their pitty party because they didn’t win the election.
WE’RE ALL SICK OF IT .. AND THEY NEED TO STOP BEFORE THEY CAUSE SOME REAL DAMAGE .. OR .. I GUESS THAT’S THE GOAL.
Sort of like moral equivalence in Fake News? Reportedly there were ATTEMPTS to hack both parties. At the DNC they succeeded. At the RNC they tried and failed. But equity of outcome is only fair.
A long time ago, I used to subscribe to the Atlantic when it was a real literary and intellectual magazine.
Now it is a screaming anti-Trump and globalist screed that is full of pure crap! And their website even has the gall to complain about my ad-blocker!!! Phooey!!
I hope Russian hack CA lottery and give me couple millions for now.
Actually, whoever leaked the DNC e-mails did no hacking—only leaking!!!!
Voters had the right to know about this stuff. And WikiLeaks is so hard to read and get through that I doubt if it had much effect on the election. So the Dims are just sore losers, not real aggrieved parties!
1. Who authorized using a private email server to route potentially classified State Department communications while serving as Secretary of State?
2. Exactly which portions of which leaked emails were falsified, or fabricated?
3. In some emails it was clear that certain Clinton foundation donors sought direct access to key government figures, by virtue of their donations. Detail the individuals and the access received as a result of their donations?
4. The leaked emails there was evidence of clear coordination between the Clinton campaign and members of the media. Exactly who in the media exchanged information with the Clinton campaign, and for what purpose?
When you get to my four questions, maybe I'll consider your five......thanks.
There is no evidence the RNC’s servers were hacked, yet this article says that they were to make a point that does not exist. There is also no evidence that Russia hacked “the election.” If all of this corruption in the DNC and Clinton campaign were in fact unearthed by Russia, that’s all the more reason she should have been defeated - you should not be engaging in the levels of corruption they were engaging in that could be found out by a foreign power and exposed - makes our high level government officials subject to blackmail by a foreign power. Not sure how they are trying to argue this somehow makes Hillary a more desirable candidate after the election - she and her campaign and the DNC did indeed engage in all of the corruption that was exposed, didn’t they? So why do they want to keep talking about it?
The Republican party said they were NOT hacked...and they can prove it.
“As the culpability of Putin’s government becomes more clear, a host of other issues remain unresolved.”
As the faultiness of your underlying assumption becomes more and more clearly absurd, the question is, how long will you maintain what has already been shown to be erroneous?
This election has been a great unmasking.
Also, if you will search term William Casey disinformation quote, you'll find this:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Another question someone should ask is HAS THE USA, STATE DEPARTMENT INTERFERRED AND INFLUENCED the election of any candidate running for Presidency in foreign countries.
Man, I hope this is all true.
This means that not only is Trump smart, he is a super-genius who is 100x smarter and more effective than a sitting president and the former super-experienced Secretary of State, both of whom we have been told repeatedly are the smartest people on Earth.
We got us a winner!
The Conservative Case for Voting for Clinton - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/dont-gamble-on-trump/506207/
Nov 2, 2016 - David Frum is a senior editor at The Atlantic and the chairman of Policy Exchange. In 2001-2002, he was a speechwriter for President George ...
From a friend:
I used to administer networks on *ix systems like Linux. Firewalls keep pretty good information about what was tried, where (even if masked), where they went (if using a load balancer) and what URL was the intruder trying to access.
To come out now and say the Russians did it means either that the CIA is incompetent and can’t figure something out that it took a big bank a few hours to figure out or they are engaged in psyops.I have difficulty believing the first, since even a little peon like me can figure that out.
This is psyops because they failed in their recount attempts to show Trump stole it - and instead revealed that it was the DEMS who did; so far they failed at intimidating the electoral college.
Sure the net is rife with rumors about rogue electors; even if it were true, the number of rogue electors is nowhere near 37 and if they haven’t changed their minds by now, they may never change their minds.
It’s worth noting that IF the CIA intended to eliminate Trump, would they tell the world?