Posted on 12/12/2016 5:22:57 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster
1. Who authorized using a private email server to route potentially classified State Department communications while serving as Secretary of State?
2. Exactly which portions of which leaked emails were falsified, or fabricated?
3. In some emails it was clear that certain Clinton foundation donors sought direct access to key government figures, by virtue of their donations. Detail the individuals and the access received as a result of their donations?
4. The leaked emails there was evidence of clear coordination between the Clinton campaign and members of the media. Exactly who in the media exchanged information with the Clinton campaign, and for what purpose?
When you get to my four questions, maybe I'll consider your five......thanks.
Apparently the Republicans were intelligent enough to secure their servers. Democrats not too bright.
I didn’t write it...someone posted it on FB and I concurred!
There is no evidence the RNC’s servers were hacked, yet this article says that they were to make a point that does not exist. There is also no evidence that Russia hacked “the election.” If all of this corruption in the DNC and Clinton campaign were in fact unearthed by Russia, that’s all the more reason she should have been defeated - you should not be engaging in the levels of corruption they were engaging in that could be found out by a foreign power and exposed - makes our high level government officials subject to blackmail by a foreign power. Not sure how they are trying to argue this somehow makes Hillary a more desirable candidate after the election - she and her campaign and the DNC did indeed engage in all of the corruption that was exposed, didn’t they? So why do they want to keep talking about it?
The logistics of the ‘hack’ make this claim ridiculous. nnnnnn counties. xxxxx software types. unknown number of networks, working voting machines, unknown number of paper ballots (at this point), unknown number of blank paper ballots, unknown ‘number’ of ‘hackers’. Unknown logic of vote reporting. Unknown logic of eliminating ‘hacking’ tracks. Unknown algorithms, passwords, network passwords, access to the states’ voting tabulations.
There are too many variables to take this claim seriously. The nuts and bolts of the thing do it in.
The Republican party said they were NOT hacked...and they can prove it.
“As the culpability of Putin’s government becomes more clear, a host of other issues remain unresolved.”
As the faultiness of your underlying assumption becomes more and more clearly absurd, the question is, how long will you maintain what has already been shown to be erroneous?
I caught that, too. Their revenue must be dropping like a rock. All shrill accusation of "fake news" could be partially due to the fact that new Internet-based outlets are taking away their readers, hitting their bottom line hard
I agree it is turning into a trashy magazine in all respects. It was indeed a literary magazine, and because of that, it was basically liberal. It did appear to have solid content on literature, and not overly politicized. Now it is a loud liberal propaganda mouthpiece.
It's a dying party's last hope
What Scenario would it change the results of the Election
Obama was suppose to investigate and install measures along with Congress to stop hacking
Neither did nothing
This election has been a great unmasking.
I still have doubts about the California vote -- particularly voting by the illegal alien population.
Also, if you will search term William Casey disinformation quote, you'll find this:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Sorry I missed that. But if you hadn’t posted it I never would have seen it as I don’t do Facebook.
Another question someone should ask is HAS THE USA, STATE DEPARTMENT INTERFERRED AND INFLUENCED the election of any candidate running for Presidency in foreign countries.
It’s just another excuse the LEFT is using to maintain their pitty party because they didn’t win the election.I don't agree that they are trying to maintain their pitty party. However, I believe they are aiming to maintain their pity party. JMHO. ;)
Israel.
We may owe Hildebeast some gratitude. Her presidential run resulted in exposing unprecedented level of corruption in Dems, media, and government: openly taking bribes in exchange for favor, mind-numbing level of security breach, and naked collusion with media to manufacture "real fake news" in favor of her.
Its damage to party's credibility as well as that of their liberal allies would be incredible. She dragged them through gutter and into stinking swamp where many are drowning.
Man, I hope this is all true.
This means that not only is Trump smart, he is a super-genius who is 100x smarter and more effective than a sitting president and the former super-experienced Secretary of State, both of whom we have been told repeatedly are the smartest people on Earth.
We got us a winner!
The Conservative Case for Voting for Clinton - The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/dont-gamble-on-trump/506207/
Nov 2, 2016 - David Frum is a senior editor at The Atlantic and the chairman of Policy Exchange. In 2001-2002, he was a speechwriter for President George ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.