Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Native Americans: Help Make America Great Again
Townhall.com ^ | November 28 | Katie Kiefer

Posted on 11/28/2016 5:15:36 AM PST by Kaslin

Native Americans protesting the construction of the 1,200-mile Dakota Access oil pipeline: quit throwing rocks at police; stop setting cars ablaze; discard your “Children Don’t Drink Oil” signs—and join your fellow brothers and sisters in making America great again.

“We don’t have weapons. … We are looking out for … the children who are not even born yet,” Standing Rock Sioux chairman David Archambault II said to defend his 10,000-member tribe’s use of violence, aggression and disorderly conduct to protest the construction of the $3.7 billion Dakota Access pipeline.

No weapons?

“A line of sheriff’s officers retreated in the face of riders on horseback circling and yipping through the grass,” and local Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier relayed “reports of weapons and gunshots” and that “protesters were getting ready to throw pipe bombs at a line of officers,” according to the New York Times.

Over 400 tribe-affiliated protesters have been arrested so far in the tribe’s not-so-peaceful (and taxpayer-subsidized) protest that has been raging near Cannon Ball, N.D. since April. Hundreds of Native Americans have threatened construction workers and law enforcement officers—claiming the pipeline jeopardizes their access to the Missouri River and stifles their heritage.

For the children?

Native American children will, in fact, be far safer; live on a cleaner planet; and have more economic opportunities if we build Dakota Access. Native Americans can still be faithful to their ancestors and traditions and welcome modern progress that will make America a better place for all of us, including the progeny of the Standing Rock Sioux.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers studied the Dakota Access pipeline’s route, which traverses underground from the North Dakota Bakken oil patch to Illinois, hauling hundreds of thousands of barrels of crude oil daily to consumers in the Midwest and Gulf Coast. As part of its study, the corps meticulously interviewed representatives of Native American tribes—including Archambault’s tribe.

The corps found the pipeline presented no major threats the environment or tribal cultural sites. Yet, instead of accepting science and keeping their word, the same tribes that effectively gave their blessings to the project threw a tantrum. Tribal parents even set up a makeshift daycare for their toddlers on the prairie so they could sustain their public tantrum for the past eight months.

My message for Native American protesters: instead of squandering your lives by menacing cops by day and plotting schemes around a campfire by night—while accessing a state-sponsored medical supply trailer, portable bathrooms, and 500-gallon drinking water tanks—I entreat you to truly advocate for peace and support a pipeline that will make America better for you and your progeny. Let me explain.

Pipelines: Clean, Safe, Smart Energy

President-elect Trump will likely inherit the Dakota Access controversy. You may recall that President Obama’s administration shut down a similar project, the Keystone XL pipeline based on parallel protests. In the case of XL, as with Dakota Access, the protestor’s claims were demonstrably false.

Myth#1: “Pipelines pilfer the planet!”

The U.S. State Department not once; not twice; butthrice declared Keystone XL to be an environmentally sound project. Furthermore, it has been proven that crude transported by pipeline emits fewer emissions than crude transported by rail. And oil deliveries by rail escalated from 20 million barrels in 2010 to a whopping 323 million barrels in 2015 thanks to pipeline panic.

Oil pipelines are specifically designed to carry the extremely flammable form of crude produced by fracking whereas trains carrying crude are prone to hazardous derailments.

In 2013, a 72-car train derailed in Quebec—leveling over 30 buildings and killing 42 individuals. It is a miracle no one was killed in a 2014 derailment in Lynchburg, VA that occurred just outside of a children’s museum. In 2015, an oil train derailed in West Virginia that hurled a gigantic fireball up 20 stories. Hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude flowed into the Columbia River in June of this year after a train derailed in Oregon. Earlier this month, a 146-car train derailed in Minnesota—dumping hazardous chemicals and forcing around 700 people to evacuate their homes.

Myth#2: Solar, wind and electric can replace fossil fuels

Earth to environmentalists: wind power kills birds and solar power displaces natural habitats. Overall, green tech is not a job creator. Just last month, Mission Solar Energy closed its doors in Texas, eliminating 87 American jobs. Mission Solar’s closure is only one of many “green” companies that Obama’s administration forced you and me to help prop up—only to quickly buckle under. Even purportedly successful green companies like Tesla only exist thanks to monetary assistance from the American taxpayer.

Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk is a billionaire, but what do you and I have to show for his company’s profits? The option to buy his pricy deathtraps? A former Navy SEAL was killed by the Tesla S sports car’s “autopilot” technology in May and another driver was run off the road and bloodied by this supposedly superior “clean” car that Musk promised would “always take care” of its passenger.

I have no problem with electric, wind, or solar power. I do have a problem with subsidizing the so-called “renewable” ventures of billionaires—especially when their technology isn’t ready for the market.

Renewable energy companies wouldn’t stand a chance without funding from EPA-mandated subsidies. For example, petroleum refiner Valero is forced to purchase “renewable identification number credits” and effectively prop up renewables in order to stay within the EPA’s good graces.

Native Americans: better jobs, cleaner air, and a safer future for your children are yours if you only set aside your grievances—which have no foundation in science or spirituality—and join the rest of us in making America great again.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: North Dakota
KEYWORDS: energy; epa; indians; nativeamericans; northdakota; oil; pipeline; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 11/28/2016 5:15:36 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They should step aside and let the grown ups get busy.

Indians have never improved anything, ever.

I was at Alcatraz with family last weekend. They trashed that place, too.


2 posted on 11/28/2016 5:22:30 AM PST by T-Bone Texan (The time is now to form up into leaderless cells of 5 men or less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There's still some of the "child of the 1960s" in me, sitting in an audience spellbound by Buffy Sainte Marie, outraged by just how bad the feds can be. The pipeline shouldn't be on native lands which the tribes own by treaty. Isn't there somewhere such as along interstates where pipelines could be built that don't destroy the environment or culturally sensitive areas?

That being said, it is true that solar and especially wind create a lot more problems than they solve.

3 posted on 11/28/2016 5:25:05 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Yeh...they live in teepees...

Never knew teepees had attached garages.

4 posted on 11/28/2016 5:32:07 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The corps found the pipeline presented no major threats the environment or tribal cultural sites. Yet, instead of accepting science and keeping their word, the same tribes that effectively gave their blessings to the project threw a tantrum.

Hypocrites.

5 posted on 11/28/2016 5:32:19 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They should stop blowing up those little green propane canisters too.


6 posted on 11/28/2016 5:32:49 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

T-Bone Texan said: “I was at Alcatraz with family last weekend. They trashed that place, too.”

Hey, you think a prison island is trashed out; have you seen what southeast Oklahoma looks like since they let white guys and their trailer houses move into Indian Territory? Just sayin’.

An Oklahoma Choctaw


7 posted on 11/28/2016 5:33:16 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grania

Those tribes initially gave the OK to build across their land.

Sorry, but they have no complaint.


8 posted on 11/28/2016 5:33:25 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grania

“such as along interstates”

I lived 1/2 mile from a pipeline blowout and you don’t want to be around when there’s a problem. What could possibly go wrong with placing it next to an interstate?


9 posted on 11/28/2016 5:34:42 AM PST by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: metmom

When you say “those tribes gave permission” do you mean that some leaders sold out or that a majority of tribe members voted for it?


10 posted on 11/28/2016 5:35:03 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania

Those were the good old days. Too bad all that peace and love was perverted by leftists into politics.


11 posted on 11/28/2016 5:36:24 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Obama+Visits+Standing+Rock+Sioux&FORM=RESTAB


12 posted on 11/28/2016 5:37:09 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
The pipeline shouldn't be on native lands which the tribes own by treaty.

I don't think this pipeline is actually being built on (or under) any native lands.

13 posted on 11/28/2016 5:39:01 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
What could go wrong along an interstate?

I thought about that when I made the suggestion. So where do you put it? I do not agree with messing up the environment or historic/heritage sites for construction projects. I wonder how many of these pipelines go through the country clubs and estates of the elite who make these decisions.

This is a problem that hasn't been solved. Perhaps part of the answer is to build factories, commercial, and residential users of electricity closer to the source.

14 posted on 11/28/2016 5:40:08 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

http://www.npr.org/2016/09/10/493436447/in-victory-for-protesters-obama-administration-halts-north-dakota-pipeline


15 posted on 11/28/2016 5:41:33 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Is it being built under sacred lands that have traditionally been left undeveloped because of that?


16 posted on 11/28/2016 5:42:04 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I don’t believe it even goes through their reservation.


17 posted on 11/28/2016 5:42:42 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania

If people would do their research they would see that this pipeline does not go through Indian lands.. they just think it’s too close and may someday affect their water.


18 posted on 11/28/2016 5:43:44 AM PST by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
With the Indians, protesting usually winds up with a cash settlement to shut them up....even though they are not entitled to a dime.

They need to start living in the present.

19 posted on 11/28/2016 5:44:44 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

nuff said


20 posted on 11/28/2016 5:45:47 AM PST by Kaslin (Most humans have an attention span of about 10 minutes, after that they will revert to daydreaming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson