Posted on 11/24/2016 7:35:24 AM PST by TigerClaws
I keep saying this, but not sure: she conceded the election. No recount should matter. Had she not conceded there might be an argument for a recount, but I fail to see how it would matter at this point. This is also not to mention the carnage that would ensue.
Here are the filing fees and deadlines for each state:
Wisconsin: $1.1 million by Nov 25
Pennsylvania: $0.5 million by Nov 28
Michigan: $0.6 million by Nov 30
Those are filing fees alone. The costs associated with recounts are a function of state law. Attorney's fees are likely to be another $2-3 million, then there are the costs of the statewide recount observers in all three states. The total cost is likely to be $6-7 million.
You can donate up to $22,700 per person by contributing up to $2,700 on this page PLUS $10,000 to each of the following state Green Parties that have allowed contributions to kickstart the recount initiative:
Money given from Soros, DNC and LESBIANS!
foreign donations?
Unfortunately, a recount is just that - counting again. What they need to do is a forensic audit of the votes, which would uncover what you mention - the huge fraud perpetrated by the Democratic campaign. The fraud isn’t in the machine count - it’s in the paper ballots full of dead people voting, people voting multiple times, and stolen absentee ballots being used to vote for Clinton. I’m all for the recount, but make it a full investigation of the integrity of the voting process in all the states. This is why the Clinton campaign isn’t piping up in all this; the last thing they want is too much scrutiny on the votes in these states because then the prosecutions will start.
1) If there were going to be votes manufactured, they would have already been done Nov 8. Being horribly concerned this will be a path to cheating doesn’t make sense.
2) If hacking happened, the hackers would have had to know which states to do. They would have had to know FL would go Trump and that these three unexpected states would make the difference. The machines are NOT ONLINE. They have no connection to the internet. So the people hacking have to know which states and machines to travel to and affect, and they have to know this before the final machine audit/check done by each state pre election.
3) All of Michigan uses paper check ballots. Not just some counties. All of it. The 7% story we got a few days ago that the source of the issue is Hillary counties looked different by 7% if paper tracked vs pure machine makes no sense in that context — AND . . . the comp science guy in question has gone public and said that article was filled with errors and the 7% issue had nothing to do with a presumption Hillary did not get a good count. His point in the interview was to audit the machines, not do a recount. He doesn’t think the results will change, he just wants confidence they weren’t hacked.
The attempted theft begins.
Probably. Or they’ll just wake up a judge.
She’s a Hillary surrogate. Only Hillary can gain from this.
Are you serious? The dims have had weeks to find the 55K votes they need. All you have to do is look at the Minnesota model where al franken kept up recounting until they got the votes.
They also have the perfect court situation. With a probable tie in any decision in SCOTUS, a lower court ruling would stand. Now, just imagine your worst nightmare. The dims get a chance for a decision from the 9th circus. They would use that avenue because of the "popular vote" from kalifornia arguing "every vote must count".
This could be 2000 all over again this time with a neutered supreme court..
I just looked up Wisconsin holidays and Friday after
Thanksgiving isn’t one of them. So they are open.
https://wisc.jobs/public/links_page_detail.asp?pageid=5
George Soros. Stein is a front for Hillary.
She’ll spend 57 cents on the recall and pocket the rest.
And Virginia
Podesta is likely running the legal show.
I heard that the supposed 7% “error” actually occurred in Wisconsin.
Crying Liberals are so easy to scam. “Give me your money and I will challenge the results.” Does anyone not a Democrat believe that is what she will spend the money on? Trump has proved that you don’t need big money to win elections. Now I am starting to believe that all that big money raised for Obama, the Bushes, Clinton, etc., was laundered to benefit the candidates themselves.
of course extended for her. If it was a conservative trying to file, then no, sorry, too bad. /s
The state office will be open Friday per their holiday schedule list.
https://wisc.jobs/public/links_page_detail.asp?pageid=5
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.