Posted on 11/01/2016 8:13:27 AM PDT by maggief
Google head Eric Schmidt's draft strategic plan for Hillary Clinton #PodestaEmails
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262 …
More: https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/ …
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Clickable:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262
https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/
Wonder what the shareholders think of this particular corporate initiative. I have a feeling it wasn’t disclosed in the prospectus.
Podesta Email Discussing ‘Eric Schmidt Project’ And ‘How Legit It Is’
FYI
I wonder what the sheeple who vote democrat think about the plans for their digital enslavement?
The thieves run thick.
This election , and the system , is still RIGGED ...
BUT TRUMP can win it anyway !
Just struggle till victory and WATCH OUT about tricks and traps !
Attorney General Gowdy can catch a Billionaire
Schmidt is talking about what Maxine Waters was talking about:
You know, Google has such domination over the dissemination of information worldwide, that maybe President Trump will want to look into application of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
That entire plan of Schmidt’s is like science fiction. .except it’s real.
What we see clearly is what we’ve always known but couldn’t prove...they detest the citizens of the country. We are data points.
Eric is being evil.
Google did a lot of damage to their brand with that single email. They are still the best at data-search. But that score a ZERO for trustworthiness.
How exactly is this not a $1.5 billion in-kind contribution? And is that legal? And would it be reported? And why am I asking these questions?
from the link
“Core engineering, voter database and contact with voters online
The database of voters (NGP Van) is a fine starting point for voter records
and is maintained by the vendor (and needs to be converted to the cloud).
The code developed for 2012 (Narwahl etc.) is unlikely to be used, and
replaced by a model where the vendor data is kept in the Van database and
intermediate databases are arranged with additional information for a voter.
Quite a bit of software is to be developed to match digital identities with
the actual voter file with high confidence. The key unit of the campaign
is a “voter”, and each and every record is viewable and updatable by
volunteers in search of more accurate information.
In the case where we can’t identify the specific human, we can still have a
partial digital voter id, for a person or “probable-person” with attributes
that we can identify and use to target. As they respond we can eventually
match to a registered voter in the main file. This digital key is
eventually matched to a real person.”
To show how stupid this jerk is he thinks Atlanta is in a blue state
He probably meant a large BLUE city? Atlanta, Austin, Miami can serve as examples.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.