Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Marshals' tackling of Ammon Bundy's lawyer creates buzz in legal community
The Oregonian ^ | October 28, 2016 | Rebecca Woolington

Posted on 10/29/2016 1:46:56 PM PDT by abb

When U.S. Marshals physically subdued attorney Marcus Mumford at the finale of the Oregon militants' trial, the encounter created a buzz across the legal community with experts saying they'd never seen anything similar happen before.

Marshals tackled and used a Taser on Mumford, Ammon Bundy's defense lawyer, following the Oregon standoff leader's acquittal in the federal conspiracy case Thursday. The agency said in a news release Friday that Mumford had become "upset and aggressive" in court after the jury verdict.

The federal agency is conducting a review of the marshals' actions, according to Thadd Baird, supervising deputy of the U.S. Marshals Service. But he declined to discuss any further specifics about the highly unusual use of force.

"The overwhelming consensus in legal circles is that any kind of altercation between law enforcement and lawyers in a courtroom is virtually unheard of," said Kateri Walsh, spokeswoman for the Oregon State Bar. "It just doesn't happen."

Mumford had been arguing that his client should be released from custody immediately, but U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown said Bundy had a hold on him from a pending federal indictment in Nevada.

Mumford yelled at the judge, and suddenly six to seven marshals closed in on him, surrounding the attorney at the defense table. The judge told them to move back, but soon after, the marshals grabbed Mumford.

They yelled at Mumford to stop resisting while the judge ordered everyone out of the courtroom.

The encounter was the culmination of a trial that included several contentious moments between Mumford and Brown. At one point last month, Brown threatened Mumford with contempt of court if he continued asking questions about the fatal police shooting of Robert "LaVoy" Finicum.

The Marshals service provides security in U.S. District Court. Mumford was arrested Thursday by the Federal Protective Service, part of the Department of Homeland Security. He was cited on accusations of failing to comply with a federal lawful order and causing a disturbance and given a Jan. 6 court date.

Mumford was released from custody nearly two hours later and spoke to reporters outside the federal courthouse. One asked whether Mumford believed the marshals acted appropriately.

"No!" the Utah-based attorney replied. He could not be reached for comment Friday.

The description of Thursday's events also led other lawyers to question whether the marshals had been too heavy-handed.

"My understanding is he just raised his voice," said Carrie Leonetti, a University of Oregon law professor who previously worked as a federal public defender in California.

Leonetti said the marshals likely considered the number of people in the courtroom before taking action, but also questioned their using a weapon against the lawyer.

"They need to be proportional to the threat," she said.

Leonetti said it would be more common for an attorney who wasn't following orders to be held in contempt, not taken down.

"I cannot think of a time when courtroom security officers have used force against a lawyer," she said.

Leonetti said the marshals' actions have an "unfortunate appearance of retaliation," but she believes their response came from training.

"The optics of tackling the lawyer who won – the optics of that are unfortunate in any situation," Leonetti said.

Tung Yin, a Lewis & Clark Law School professor, also said he'd never heard of force being used against an attorney in court.

"I would say it is multiple standards of deviation away from the norm," he said.

Yin said the courtroom scene appeared to highlight how invested Mumford had become in his client's case – he shouted arguments instead of putting them in writing.

Prisoners in Nevada, at least, were paying attention, according to Deb Jordan, a self-described advocacy journalist who is the girlfriend and business partner of Pete Santilli.

Santilli was initially charged in the Oregon standoff case, but prosecutors dropped their conspiracy indictment against him the day before trial. He has a pending case in Nevada and is being held in jail there.

Jordan said she spoke to Santilli about how the inmates in Nevada reacted to authorities using a Taser on and arresting Mumford.

"They all just started laughing," she said. "Fight to the end! Never say die! It's been such a circus from the beginning. They just kind of chuckled and said, "Perfect ending.'"

Maxine Bernstein and Carli Brosseau of The Oregonian/OregonLive contributed to this report.

-- Rebecca Woolington

rwoolington@oregonian.com

503-294-4049; @rwoolington


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: bundy; oregon; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Fallout from the Bundy trial.
1 posted on 10/29/2016 1:46:56 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
This is COMPLETELY SHOCKING.

Mumford crying tears of joy, facing camera.


2 posted on 10/29/2016 1:48:52 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

All part of the new trend you can expect to martial law by Obama.


3 posted on 10/29/2016 1:49:15 PM PDT by Rapscallion (The Clinton cabal like Obama intends to destroy the America you used to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

What did the judge have to say? Doesn’t the judge have authority in his own courtroom?


4 posted on 10/29/2016 1:49:22 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Everywhere is freaks and hairies Dykes and fairies, tell me where is sanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The JBTs are sore losers?


5 posted on 10/29/2016 1:49:35 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Judge Ana Brown


6 posted on 10/29/2016 1:50:14 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

So... an officer of the court raises his voice to the judge, and gets tasered and thrown in a jail cell.

I guess that’s one way to win an argument.


7 posted on 10/29/2016 1:51:07 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
"The judge told them to move back, but soon after, the marshals grabbed Mumford. "

Interesting. I figured that the Judge asked for some help to maintain order in the courtroom.

Now it seems like the Marshals acted autonomously, like the Domestic Terrorists they apparently are.

8 posted on 10/29/2016 1:51:18 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

brown shirted jack boots


9 posted on 10/29/2016 1:52:07 PM PDT by DOC44 (Have gun will travel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Klownie the Kenyan has a few more weeks before he declares it. He’ll do something stupid before he goes, that’s for sure.


10 posted on 10/29/2016 1:52:25 PM PDT by max americana (fired every liberal in our company at every election cycle..and laughed at their faces (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

She was nominated to the Court by Bill Clinton.


11 posted on 10/29/2016 1:52:25 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

.
Fed Gov is always a sore loser.

Those marshals should stand trial for aggravated assault.
.


12 posted on 10/29/2016 1:54:15 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

From the reports of the trial posted here, she sounded like a firm Statist.


13 posted on 10/29/2016 1:54:44 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

.
Her courtroom.

The marshals were clearly in contempt. She had ordered them to get back.
.


14 posted on 10/29/2016 1:56:08 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb
They yelled at Mumford to stop resisting

Well, they were properly trained as US Police officers then. Yell "stop resisting" while you are beating a citizen, and then you cam always claim he "resisted arrest" and "didn't follow police instructions."

Had Mumford also made a "furtive move", them they also would have had recourse to shoot him.

15 posted on 10/29/2016 1:57:51 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Their supervisors should punish the officers. The court should impose sanctions on the officers. Atny Mumford should file a civil suit.


16 posted on 10/29/2016 1:58:01 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

.
Judge “Butch” Brown.
.


17 posted on 10/29/2016 1:59:16 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

The Marshals work for the Justice Dept and who heads the Justice Dept, Lynch. Obviously her disdain for our laws permeates down to her thug marshals. Americans better wake up.


18 posted on 10/29/2016 2:00:46 PM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Not in a show trial.


19 posted on 10/29/2016 2:02:51 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb
Maybe Barney smelled merrywanna.

It gives them the legal right to murder you in a lot of the US.

20 posted on 10/29/2016 2:03:52 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson