Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nations, Fighting Powerful Refrigerant That Warms Planet, Reach Landmark Deal
NY Times ^ | OCT. 15, 2016 | CORAL DAVENPORT

Posted on 10/14/2016 10:26:17 PM PDT by justlittleoleme

Negotiators from more than 170 countries on Saturday reached a legally binding accord to counter climate change by cutting the worldwide use of a powerful planet-warming chemical used in air-conditioners and refrigerators.

-snip-

While the Paris agreement included pledges by nearly every country to cut emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the fossil fuels that power vehicles, electric plants and factories, the new Kigali deal has a single target: chemical coolants called hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs, used in air-conditioners and refrigerators.

-snip-

And while the Paris pledges are broad, they are also voluntary, often vague and dependent on the political will of future world leaders. In contrast, the Kigali deal includes specific targets and timetables to replace HFCs with more planet-friendly alternatives, trade sanctions to punish scofflaws, and an agreement by rich countries to help finance the transition of poor countries to the costlier replacement products.

-snip-

The deal came about in part because President Obama, as he sought to build a legacy of tackling climate change, elevated the obscure effort to amend the Montreal Protocol to a top White House priority. The final agreement is also consistent with Mr. Obama’s efforts to push his climate change agenda while using creative ways to bypass a hostile Congress.

-snip-

The final deal will divide the world economy into three tracks. The richest countries, including the United States and those in the European Union, will freeze the production and consumption of HFCs by 2018

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 2018; airconditioning; china; climatechange; climatehoaxes; con; freeze; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; govtabuse; hfc; hfcs; junkscience; montrealprotocol; ozonehole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: JohnBovenmyer

When the real question is, what chemical benefiting mankind will NOT ultimately end up on the list of BAD chemicals associated with the mythical, pseudo science, of global catastrophic warming?

The cost of compliance with government rules and regulations written by unelected bureaucrats will go down in history as the straw that bankrupted the public, unless state governments grow a pair and tell the bureaucrats we will not comply.


21 posted on 10/15/2016 1:05:59 AM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and. the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

R12 was banned 30 years ago. The Ozone hole is the same size as it’s always been. But Freon went from 88 cents a can to $9 a can. The next iteration will be even higher.


22 posted on 10/15/2016 1:11:47 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme
The Professor’s Lesson on HFO, HC Refrigerants

Next-gen Fluids Each Offer Unique Traits, Characteristics

http://www.achrnews.com/articles/128201-the-professors-lesson-on-hfo-hc-refrigerants

23 posted on 10/15/2016 2:41:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

You got the issue spot on but it is DuPont, not Dow.


24 posted on 10/15/2016 2:59:39 AM PDT by mazda77 (The solution: Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
When did the US Senate ratify this treaty? How is it legally binding on America without Senate approval? Or does Obama simply rule by decree??
From the article:

Under the Montreal treaty, nations can amend the original accord to phase out substitute chemicals that also harm the environment, even if they do not affect the ozone layer.

That means the Kigali Amendment maintains the legal force of a treaty, even if that treaty was ratified by the Senate during the Reagan administration.

“It’s remarkable: This treaty that was designed for something quite different is now being used as a vehicle to address climate change,” said David Doniger, a lawyer with the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group.

25 posted on 10/15/2016 3:05:24 AM PDT by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Yep. Put your skin where your mouth is...


26 posted on 10/15/2016 3:07:08 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Dupont rejoices.

https://eng.ucmerced.edu/people/awesterling/SPR2014.ESS141/Assignments/DuPont


27 posted on 10/15/2016 3:13:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Haha - that reminds me of the Musical, 1776: The flies would sure come fast!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqAdlkJDt7k


28 posted on 10/15/2016 3:14:31 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego; kaehurowing
The Montreal Protocol was ratified in 1987 and Obama can commit to this Kigali agreement based on that.

The US ratified the UN Framework on Climate Change(UNFCCC) in 1992. Based on that ratification, Bill Clinton committed the US to the Kyoto Protocol, but GW Bush withdrew the US from the Kyoto Protocol.

Likewise, Obama committed the US to the Paris Agreement based on the 1992 UNFCCC ratification, but Trump has said he would withdraw the US from the Paris agreement. Or, if he wanted to, Trump could withdraw the US from the 1992 UNFCCC.

29 posted on 10/15/2016 3:22:23 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Of course your are correct, but none of that matters to the left. Facts just get in the way of the results they want. We will get tons more of this if Hillary is elected.


30 posted on 10/15/2016 3:29:44 AM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Refrigerator manufacturers rejoice! Now people are going to have to replace their perfectly good refrigerators with new ones.

At a yard sale, I had a chance to buy a working refrigerator with SULFUR as the refrigerant. I saw it later at the town dump!

31 posted on 10/15/2016 3:50:02 AM PDT by Does so (Vote for Hillary...Stay Home...==8-O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


32 posted on 10/15/2016 4:31:32 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

1. It’s not
2. It’s not
3. Yes


33 posted on 10/15/2016 4:37:24 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
When the new patent runs out and after all the replacement refrigerators and air conditioners are running with it, the NEW refrigerant will be found to cause mutations in fire ants. This, of course, will cause world-wide turmoil, again, and a rush to replace it with a new patented product.

34 posted on 10/15/2016 5:08:34 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Kill TWITTER !! Kill FACEBOOK !! Free MILO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Any amendment to a treaty must also be ratified or the amendment is moot. We can’t have post facto law, we can’t have post facto treaties that supersede the law. Let the litigation begin!


35 posted on 10/15/2016 5:08:36 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.
By GEORGE ! (oops)

That is a DAMNED good musical !

TERRIFIC association, Paul.

thanx

36 posted on 10/15/2016 5:12:02 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true .. and it pisses people off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Yes, I saw the original on stage in St. Louis as a teen. Loved it, and still do. The big guy who intones “Somebody ought to open up a windowwww...” (and then gets shouted down) was hilarious. The guy who played Adams was just great!


37 posted on 10/15/2016 5:52:02 AM PDT by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

HFCs have a cooling effect on the planet


38 posted on 10/15/2016 6:29:31 AM PDT by dila813 (Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme; VanShuyten; dfwgator; dp0622; reg45; funfan; MIA_eccl1212; Sioux-san; ...
...more than 170 countries on Saturday reached a legally binding accord to counter climate change by cutting the worldwide use of a powerful planet-warming chemical... -snip- ...the Kigali deal includes ... an agreement by rich countries to help finance the transition of poor countries ...

President Trump needs to make it very clear with a declaration to the U.N. that all "legally binding accords" that Obama agreed to, but Congress did not ratify, constitute treaties that are immediately null and void.

Not only that, but "legally binding"(?) to finance poor countries? That constitutes a GLOBAL TAX, with a permanent funding source for a one-world government!
39 posted on 10/15/2016 6:39:12 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (After BHO starts a nuclear war before November 8th and blames Russia, our MSM will back up his lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It’s called “Planned Obsolescence” in which things are made to not last so long forcing you to keep money moving in the economy by buying new items.
My folks bought a small air fan which lasted fifty eight years, a B&W TV which lasted 15 years, later a small air conditioner that lasted thirty eight years.

Now such items are lucky to last five years.

We were taught in high School, sixty years ago, that high dollar items were not designed to become obsolete to force you to buy newer items.

Yeah, Sure.


40 posted on 10/15/2016 7:17:24 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (She is an evil woman. Jezebel Athaliah Livia Drusilla Messalina Lucrezia Borgia Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson