" We at CNN uphold the strictest of standards."
Posted on 10/12/2016 4:20:22 AM PDT by kevcol
There is a youtube video of Bill Clintons testimoney going around where they describe the sex acts that took place in the oval office and Bill squirming to try to weasel out of answering
The attorney finally tells him basically this is a “yes” or “no” question, and to stop giving long-winded answers.
WE NEED TO STOP PREACHING TO THE CHOIR HERE ON FR> GET ON FaceBook AND SPREAD THE MESSAGE TO OTHERS.
The issue is dead meat CNN.Get over it you phony prudes.
wiki:
“In 2003, Keilar moved to New York to be an anchor, reporter, and producer for CBS News on mtvU, a newscast that aired on MTV’s college network. At CBS News on mtvU, she covered the 2004 presidential primaries and election from New Hampshire, Boston, and New York City. Brianna also covered the 2005 NFL Draft for mtvU. “
MTV and the NFL ... and she’s never heard language like that?!
I’ve both heard and said worse myself, but here’s the thing: I would never use language like that in public, and it’s a pretty safe bet I’ll never run for President. As soon as I heard about Trump’s remarks my mind went immediately back to Bill’s actual deeds in the White House. What a double standard!
Go to just about any current Hollywood movie, watch a made for cable TV shows or listen to Sirius talk radio and you’ll hear this kind of talk.
They killed shame ages ago by acting like we were creepy prudes, yet now they want to use it and are shocked at how little we care. The culture is desensitized.
" We at CNN uphold the strictest of standards."
Ben Carson has lived his life in the real world.
Not curled up in the fetal position in some “safe space”.
:: The same people who read 50 Shades of Grey are offended, and have never, ever heard such? Please ::
I would think that, in the next debate, Trump should ask Hillary for her review of the NYT best-seller “50-Shades of Grey”.
Priceless!
I don’t think we mere mortals can fully comprehend what it must be like to be worth billions and have beautiful women literally throwing themselves at you. I think that, really, if you actually listen to what was said on that tape this is what Trump was saying. Even he was amazed.
Certainly, those of us raised in the 50s and 60s know what it was like to be expected to act like Ladies and Gentlemen. We have been horrified at the things we have been forced to endure for the last couple of decades. To try to further abuse us with manufactured outrage at this point is stupid but consider the source.
Remember that day when Trump first said to the blacks, "What have you got to lose?" Keilar immediately put on her pissy, sour-face. Oh was she angry. Her demeanor was practically shouting, "HOW DARE YOU? HOW DARE YOU EVEN THINK OF TRYING TO GET THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTE?
What a tw@t.
Fiegned shock and outrage I’m sure, just don’t ever show up at one of our job sites sites.
So incredibly out of touch with America..
Hey! Carson said he grew up in DETROIT.
; )
“And isn’t that a very sad commentary on the state of morals in our country.”
I’m not sure I agree with that.
It’s not like Trump walked up to some random female and started talking like that - it was off-mic “locker room talk” between two guys. I’m sure the other guy was saying something similar, and neither of them was offended... so who cares? Is it crude? Yeah. Is it the way I would talk? No. Does it bother me? Only in that the media can take something so stupid and try to affect an election with it in order to get the Evil Thing elected as President.
As Trump said, it’s just words. Liberals have to stop being such hypocritical pussies. As if THEIR lives are spent in pure, moral pursuits, like reading books on how to better mankind, or out on holy missions trying to save the earth from ashtrays or paper bags or whatever other nonsense they’re out to save the earth from this week. Hell, these are the dimwits who “celebrate” homosexuality with parades. And they want to act offended by dirty words. Spare me.
I do occasionally - usually while stopped at a traffic light near some loser who thinks the whole world wants to hear his "music."
“I don’t think we mere mortals can fully comprehend what it must be like to be worth billions and have beautiful women literally throwing themselves at you.”
I was thinking this the other day. Before we get judgmental about Trump, we need to ask ourselves what WE’D do if we were single, with 10 billion dollars, surrounded by attractive women - ALL of whom want to be with you - ALL of the time.
To tell you the truth, I’m not sure I would be able to resist.
This little snowflake needs to get used to men’s locker room talk. She’s going to be hearing a lot of it in the ladies’ room.
Look at that angry propaganda-reader face!
Who can blame them? Things are topsy-turvey in their little world, because conservatives should be in a tizzy. That’s what they expected, and that’s the way it’s supposed to be dog-gone-it!!!
They seem utterly confused that a man would talk dirty. And no wonder, they’re used to defending the ACTIONS of the Clinton’s and their close associates (for example Weiner - where are Anthony and Huma, BTW), and now they’re faced with nothing but guy talk - no ACTION, just TALK.
I’ve heard lots of this talk because I grew up around guys. Nothing my Dear Dad could do to shield me, though he tried.
I heard an interview on NPR this morning with a woman heading a pro-life group. They had her on because she was disgusted with Trumps remarks. As they set it up and the conversation began, I assumed she was going to say this was the last straw and she must now vote Hillary. It was sure sounding that way.
However, the interview didn’t go the way they wanted. Yes, she was really condumning his comments and said that it caused a LOT of women to relive what they hated about what men will do. But then they made the big mistake: They asked her who she would vote for now.
She said, Trump. She went on to articulate that both of the clintons treated women far worse than Trump claimed to have don, and the real issue was what they would do in office and who they would put on the SCOTUS.
In fact, the interviewer (the guy on morning edition) kinda had to reel her in and expose his bias a little (as the debate moderators did) because she was making such a good case for both moving on from this and the Clintons are far worse in this category.
It was a beautiful thing.
Ah, but there was a time...when I would have been up for the challenge. Of resisting, that is. At least I think I can remember that time. Getting difficult.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.