Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gross: Low Rates Pushing Investors to Gold, Bitcoin
Barron's ^ | 4 Oct 2016 | Bill Gross

Posted on 10/05/2016 7:43:54 AM PDT by oblomov

My country club locker room is a fascinating 19th hole observatory where human nature and intelligence often come into conflict. Almost all of my golfing buddies are risk takers by nature and many of them are gamblers — not just in the card room but also in the casinos in Las Vegas. Having spent some time in Sin City myself in my early 20s as one of the first blackjack counters, I was, and still am, most familiar with odds and the impossibility of beating the “House” in any game other than blackjack over a long period of time.

Still, this commonsensical conclusion is not so obvious to many of my friends, who first of all, claim that they usually “break even” on any particular weekend jaunt, and secondly, suggest that they can win by using various betting “systems” that somehow allow them to claw back losses or stabilize winnings.

An absurd example of this would be to triple your bet if you’ve lost three times in a row, and if you lose that, to quadruple your bet and so on. All of these illusions are derivatives of the so-called Martingale System, which claims that it is mathematically impossible to lose, given enough money and the willingness of the casino to take the increasing bet. The latter conditions, however, are where reality meets the road. A string of four, five or perhaps 30 straight losses cannot work in the long run because the size of the bets eventually reach billions of dollars.

(Excerpt) Read more at barrons.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bitcoin; bonds; federalreserve; gold
Our entire political system is using a martingale betting system. Eventually the casino will disallow further betting, i.e. investors will cease extending credit if the risk of ruin is too high.
1 posted on 10/05/2016 7:43:54 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Having spent some time in Sin City myself in my early 20s as one of the first blackjack counters, I was, and still am, most familiar with odds and the impossibility of beating the “House” in any game other than blackjack over a long period of time.
If Mr. Gross "blackjack counter" (aka card counter) wasn't black balled from the casinos before he is now.
2 posted on 10/05/2016 8:10:37 AM PDT by lewislynn (Ryan is the other half of the reason Romney got creamed by a negro with a Nobel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

And that’s the thing about blackjack counting. Getting out before you’re caught so you can do it over and over again.


3 posted on 10/05/2016 8:47:35 AM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

But he just publicly stated he’s a card counter. He doesn’t have to get caught, he outed himself and that’s good enough for casinos.


4 posted on 10/05/2016 8:55:58 AM PDT by lewislynn (Ryan is the other half of the reason Romney got creamed by a negro with a Nobel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I’ve owned gold for about four years. Haven’t seen the price needle move all that much. Some growth this year after a three-year gradual slide but, to me, it’s not news if it doesn’t return to $1500/oz


5 posted on 10/05/2016 10:15:29 AM PDT by OrangeHoof ("If you cain't run yo own house, you cain't run da White House. Cain't do it." - Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I started buying PMs in 1996. I have seen a big gain on those purchases, but my average cost keeps creeping higher as I make additional purchases.


6 posted on 10/05/2016 10:19:29 AM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

“And that’s the thing about blackjack counting. Getting out before you’re caught so you can do it over and over again.”

I almost never go to casinos, so I may be missing something, but couldn’t casinos make card counting a non-issue just by using larger shoes that hold more decks, and/or refilling the shoes more often? If they don’t take such an obvious (to me) measure, aren’t they, in effect, inviting people to try to keep track of what cards have been played? It might make sense to leave card counting as a live possibility to egg people on to try it (because most wouldn’t do it well), but why then throw them out?


7 posted on 10/05/2016 10:27:20 AM PDT by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stirner

Casinos are absolutely paranoid about anyone who manages to legitimately figure out a way to beat the system or even get better odds than the next guy. I’m talking “Alex Jones gone off his medication for a month” paranoid. My friend’s fiance got permanently banned for card counting and she’s a 140-pound little gal in a *wheelchair*. THAT is how paranoid they are about this.

As to trying to make it a non-issue with larger shoes and such, the other thing casinos are known for besides being paranoid is not changing favorite games.


8 posted on 10/05/2016 11:42:18 PM PDT by Laser_Ray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson