Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Young-Earth Creationist Wins Lawsuit
Proslogion ^ | 10-4-16 | Dr. Jay L. Wile

Posted on 10/04/2016 12:52:05 PM PDT by fishtank

Young-Earth Creationist Wins Lawsuit

Oct. 4, 2016

More than three years ago, I wrote about the sad story of Mark Armitage, a gifted scientist who has become an expert in microscopy. In addition to running his own microscope company, he also worked as the Manager for the Electron and Confocal Microscopy Suite in the Biology Department at California State University Northridge. While on a fossil dig in the Hell Creek Formation in Montana, he discovered a 48-inch Triceratops horn. When he and his colleague soaked it in weak acid to remove the mineral components, they recovered soft, brown tissue.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.drwile.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: censorship; creation; creationism; dinosaur; fakecrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Electron microscope image of three soft bone cells from a dinosaur fossil

1 posted on 10/04/2016 12:52:05 PM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I met Dr. Wile (the author) once; can’t recall where. He is a nice man.


2 posted on 10/04/2016 12:53:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The coming of a Cthulhu presidency will be heralded by a worldwide wave of madness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Follow the evidence. If it points toward a young earth, then perhaps the earth is indeed “younger” than many say. Follow the evidence.


3 posted on 10/04/2016 12:55:36 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... I am voting for Trump. #NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Evidence? From the field? Why, science has advanced far from the paleolithic days of field work. Now, we just create models that fit our theories, and render the results we want, right in our very own offices!


4 posted on 10/04/2016 12:57:59 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Go back to sleep.


5 posted on 10/04/2016 1:02:10 PM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failures)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Years ago, I seem to remember one of the Messianic Jewish
teachers talking about the way time & eternity appears to
the Lord as opposed to how it appears to us. The way he
described it was defining the Creator as viewing his
creation from a viewpoint that is in a sort of “fanning
out” reality, so that what is to us thousands of years is
from his vantage point just a very short time.


6 posted on 10/04/2016 1:02:15 PM PDT by Twinkie (John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahithophel

I beg your pardon?


7 posted on 10/04/2016 1:02:38 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The coming of a Cthulhu presidency will be heralded by a worldwide wave of madness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Yup, exactly what ICR et al is about: prove the theory at all costs.


8 posted on 10/04/2016 1:02:40 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
right in out of our very own offices orifices!
9 posted on 10/04/2016 1:03:57 PM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
I am tired of the false dichotomy here. Not every discovery has to do with whether naturalism or theism is true.

There have already been a number of occasions that species that were shown to have died out long long ago by fossil records, were found to still be around. So, it seems on the cards that a species that was thought to be extinct a long time ago by fossil records may have become extinct much more recently than we thought.

I am not sure how well this horn makes the case that the triceratops is more recently extinct than thought. But I do know its ridiculous to always make these kinds of questions about more than what they are about.

10 posted on 10/04/2016 1:13:14 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Hating Islam is the natural consequence of caring about people in the Middle East, including Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

this is not the first time that soft tissue/blood cells have been found on dinosaur fossils in Montana.

I’m not commenting beyond that.

I’m just pointing out that...nothing more nothing less. :)


11 posted on 10/04/2016 1:13:33 PM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
THIS CANNOT BE TRUE!!!

Why? Because we all know that Dinosaurs are Millions of years old and cells only survive for a few thousand years

We know this because the Earth's Geological layers tell us how old everything is

And we know how old everything is because the fossils in the Earth's layers tell us how old each layer is!!!


(Typical evolutionist circular argument)
12 posted on 10/04/2016 1:19:07 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Anyone have a scientific explanation for cells in a fossil?


13 posted on 10/04/2016 1:19:16 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Ummm...at the risk of sounding ignorant - why doesn’t (didn’t) Armitage simply make the sample(s) available for others to study?

Regardless of his conclusions, the sample(s) should stand on there own.


14 posted on 10/04/2016 1:20:40 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ahithophel; Tax-chick

You don’t have to agree with someone but you certainly don’t need to be rude.


15 posted on 10/04/2016 1:22:44 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

http://www.history.com/news/scientists-find-soft-tissue-in-75-million-year-old-dinosaur-bones


16 posted on 10/04/2016 1:23:02 PM PDT by Sheapdog (Chew the meat, spit out the bones - FUBO - Come and get me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Maybe the person was on the wrong thread?


17 posted on 10/04/2016 1:26:57 PM PDT by Tax-chick (The coming of a Cthulhu presidency will be heralded by a worldwide wave of madness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

;-)


18 posted on 10/04/2016 1:30:07 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... I am voting for Trump. #NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

But in this case, we’re talking scientific evidence. Not religious theories.

The scientific evidence indicates that creatures thought to have gone extinct millions of years ago may in fact have been alive on earth just a few thousands of years ago.

Let’s allow the evidence to inform our understanding of the world, even if it takes us to places that shake our worldviews.


19 posted on 10/04/2016 1:33:23 PM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... I am voting for Trump. #NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

“So, it seems on the cards that a species that was thought to be extinct a long time ago by fossil records may have become extinct much more recently than we thought.”

Well, that might be a possibility if the triceratops were found in strata that correspond to only a few thousand years ago (according to standard geologic interpretation), but that is not what we are looking at. We are looking at unfossilized cells from strata that geologists date at tens of millions of years old. The only possibilities are:

a) There is some unknown process that allows biological matter to survive without decaying for tens of millions of years

or

b) The standard interpretations of geologists and evolutionary biologists are wrong.

Those are really the only options.


20 posted on 10/04/2016 1:37:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson