Posted on 10/04/2016 9:33:14 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
Really? Cause it still feels like we’re dealing with the same old $hit.
I’m sure the drone strike joke made him feel a bit uneasy.
This this and this!!
If we find out she is a secret pro-life activist.
^^ This.
Wikileaks has helped and sure it will help some more but it's Ronald Trump
It's been said that even if Hillary were caught on the steps of the Capitol barbecuing babies and eating them, she would not be prosecuted and the leftist media would still support her.
I learned about 10 years of Wikileaks, and saw Alex Jones ranting and raving after he had to stay up all night and nothing to show for it.
People need to calm down about Wikileaks. Of course he’s going to say that he has no intention of destroying Hillary, or anything like that. I’ve seen tons of interviews with him, he’s running a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to providing a secure, anonymous place for leaks to come out to the public. You can explain his every move by considering what the impact of it will be on that mission. Being seen as a partisan, personal opponent of Hillary doesn’t enhance it at all. And no matter what he has, he can’t know what the impact will be anyways. There’s already more than enough in the public domain that Hillary should’ve long ago been “destroyed”. Even if he has 4K video and crystal clear audio of her accepting a suitcase full of cash from a Saudi sheikh in return for a promise of State Department protection, it probably wouldn’t change the dynamics of this race very much.
I could have cared the less what Assange did or did not do. He already did more than I expected when he dumped the DNC e-mails. He did more than it would have normally taken to end any candidate’s campaign.
BUT. . . .it has often been said that Hillary could be caught on film shooting puppies and the school children holding them and it would not make one bit of difference. I think that is pretty accurate at this point. She has the corrupt media to cover for her in spin and omission. She has an Army of “free stuff uber alles” voters to vote for her. She has the Wall Street elites who she hangs with in the Hamptons (and decries as the “evil rich” all while they pay her to speak at their functions and generously donate to her campaign). She has the Hollywood elites who live on a different stratosphere than us to act as another arm of the propaganda machine and also donate generously to her campaign.
Given all of that, what has become apparent is that there are one set of laws and rules for us and another for the neo-aristocracy. Isn’t that what Trump’s rise has been all about? Isn’t it about the fact that it is an issue what Trump legally did on his tax returns while there is nothing to see when it comes to criminally compromising our national security then having it covered up by the FBI? Trump has preached that the system is rigged. He has asked us to stand against it. Does it really take one or two more Assange e-mail dumps to convince anyone otherwise and, if it does, can they really be convinced?
It sure would be nice to become enraged or chuckle over a few more e-mails showing the Clinton is a criminal or needs someone to change her depens on a more frequent basis. It would not, however, win or lose this campaign. Mr. Trump and his campaign are going to have to power through the slings and arrows of outrageous corruption by continuing to hammer the issues and take their case to the American People.
AJ almost made it worth it.
Could it be an extortion scheme? Maybe the requisite payments are being made in a timely fashion -the threats make sure they keep coming.
I’m of sure what good $20 million is if you live in the basement of the Ecudoran embassy but I’m sure it will keep him flush with Redbull, Cheetos and the latest x-box gaming terminals.
No reason to liken him to Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin has done nothing like them.
Stone and Assange are reprehensible low lifes.
That at times they may aid our side does not belie that.
Add Alex Jones in with Assange and Stone.
No. Debra Schultz hadn’t resigned until Assange. The releases have been significant.
What exactly could he have on Illary to take her down? Nothing. The Uranium One deal alone should have taken her and bill down.
Heck obama too. That deal started in 2008. That deal had to go thru and on valjars desk.
Where has she been during this campaign?
Ya think the former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and others, would agree with you that it's all, "Hot air"?
These were recent historic events.
Did you miss all that?
Why don't you just change your freepname to CLINTON SHILL.
It would hide you better.
Maybe he is timing any future releases closer to the election to maximize impact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.