[COBOL2Java]

I’d really have to see the wording of the actual law before I’d swallow this particular hook.

Did you click on the link? The story includes a link to State vs. Holle. You can see for yourself.

[Mr. Douglas]

“...if defendants can prove that they were “not motivated by sexual interest,” then they can avoid being deemed sex offenders. But this places the burden of proof on the accused to prove their innocence, not the state to prove their guilt. The state no longer has to demonstrate that the contact was non-sexual—the accused party has to prove that.”

---

Boom. That makes it unconstitutional.

[TexasGator]

Heed your own advice and read it ...