Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

German mayor beaten up by mob after expressing support for asylum seekers
the Telegragh ^ | 9-30-16 | Justin Huggler

Posted on 10/01/2016 3:07:34 PM PDT by dynachrome

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: dynachrome

It’s always got to be “far right” to tar opponents with hints of nazism, but I suspect they’re anything but. Collapsing social services isn’t in the interest of the left, and this threatens to do that.


21 posted on 10/01/2016 3:26:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

We need to open our doors to the REAL refugees from Germany, France, Sweden, anyone fleeing Muslim persecution. The Muslims here need to be encouraged to LEAVE.


22 posted on 10/01/2016 3:29:11 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Germans are going to go all Visigoth and revert to form.


23 posted on 10/01/2016 3:29:26 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (2 Timothy 4:7 deo duce ferro comitante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Gee, that’s too bad.

L


24 posted on 10/01/2016 3:29:29 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
The mayor of a village in Germany had to be hospitalised after he was severely beaten in a suspected far-Right attack over his support for asylum-seekers.

That's the spirit!

25 posted on 10/01/2016 3:30:07 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

“We need a Marshal Plan to save Germany from Islam as we did from Communism.”

More like they need a “Mauser” plan.


26 posted on 10/01/2016 3:30:23 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“...over his support for asylum-seekers.”

You are responsible for your actions and for the words that come out of your mouth.


27 posted on 10/01/2016 3:31:29 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

No, we need to get out of there and force them to take care of themselves.


28 posted on 10/01/2016 3:31:52 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I think Merkel is looking for a final solution to the problem of the German people and other cis-het-whites. /sarc>


29 posted on 10/01/2016 3:32:43 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“Oersdorf for the Oersdorfers”.

Try to say that after a couple pints.


30 posted on 10/01/2016 3:32:57 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Was Pepe somehow involved?

Fritz von Pepe.

31 posted on 10/01/2016 3:34:08 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Germans need to find their inner Frederick Barbarous!
I will settle for their inner Frederick the Great.


32 posted on 10/01/2016 3:34:39 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
“Oersdorf for the Oersdorfers”


33 posted on 10/01/2016 3:37:59 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Hi.

“Germans are going to go all Visigoth and revert to form.”

You’re correct, and that could be a problem again down the road.

5.56mm


34 posted on 10/01/2016 3:38:19 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
In the run-up to the American Revolution, many government agents received similar hands-on criticism for ill-considered actions, such as, for instance, Crown Customs agent John Malcom:

The Chastisement of John Malcolm

In 1774, John Malcolm was a Crown customs collector, based in Boston. At that time Boston had had five years of civic tension culminating in the Boston Massacre. Malcolm, like most Crown representatives didn't much like the Bostonians and harboured smouldering resentment against the uppity locals who had been resisting Crown authority since the Stamp Act in 1768. They made his job difficult. Malcolm had more reason than most to hold a grudge against the colonists. He had only recently had a run-in with the good people of Portland, Maine on a customs matter over which they had disagreed. The Portland folks saw fit to tar and feather Malcolm but were kind enough to allow him to remain clothed for the treatment. Being a prideful man who was impressed by his own authority, this didn't sit well.

In the snow covered streets of Boston in January, Malcolm was run over by a boy sledding in the street. Malcolm, his temper getting the best of him, raised his cane to strike the boy. George Hewes, a local shoemaker, intervened and Malcolm turned on Hewes. At first, Malcolm tried to overawe Hewes with his social rank - being a gentleman and, in Malcolm's mind, a hero of the French and Indian War. Hewes took the vituperation of Malcolm with a grain of salt and retorted "Be that as it may, I was never tarred and feathered." That was the match to Malcolm's tinder and he flew at Hewes and struck him a near fatal blow to the head with his cane.

The town of Boston was electric with tension between the locals and Crown representatives and word of this attack spread almost instantly. A crowd gathered at Malcolm's house while he shouted out a window, relishing baiting the crowd into an uproar, and flourishing with his sword, eventually stabbing one man in the chest.

The crowd swarmed the house, forcing Malcolm to retreat to the second floor. Malcolm was eventually disarmed and the crowd seized him, tied him, put him on a sled and dragged him through the town as brickbats rained upon him.

After pulling him by the wharfs to pick up a barrel of tar, the mob took him to King St, by the Town House, where political rallies were customarily held and where the Massacre had occurred.

In the chill of the coldest night of a Boston January Malcolm was stripped, dislocating his arm, and hot tar daubed on his bare skin, burning his flesh.

Feathers then were applied to give what was then called the "modern jacket". Malcolm was then paraded, both burned and freezing, from one end of the town to the other and back. At the Liberty Tree they threw a noose around his neck and threatened to hang him if he didn't denounce the Governor and the Customs Commissioners. He refused but they didn't hang him. Instead they paraded him back to the far end of town again, eventually rolling him out of the cart at his home "like a log."

Malcolm wasn't the first or last to suffer from the people's anger. In the time before Concord and Lexington many Crown representatives as well as colonists in government positions suffered their houses to be ransacked, demolished or fired and their persons to be insulted most cruelly. Soon, the British Regulars - the Redcoats - the Crown's SWAT teams of the time - which had been withdrawn after the Boston Massacre in an attempt to calm matters were returned in force and Boston was placed under martial law.

35 posted on 10/01/2016 3:45:29 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“Merkel needs to go.”

It’s not Merkel. In Germany you vote for the party. The party has a platform. If I recall, Merkel represents what was at the time, the largest party, the CDU. She embodies its platform. The CDU had to partner with the SDU, if I recall. Between them they are about 50% of the vote. Both of those parties are pro immigrant/invader.

The only anti-immigrant party is the AFD. The AFD, depending on location, is between 11-19% of the vote. So far the party loyalty has been solid. The German version of the gimmedats vote for their party to protect their socialist benefits. However, the AFD is growing rapidly. They will probably not have enough of the vote to rule alone. I don’t think any party has for at least fifty years. Nobody wants to partner with the AFD and the AFD has no nationally recognized players who could easily assume the leadership role. (Rather like the Tea Party here.)

This is a long-winded way of saying that even if Merkel is gone, it is likely the current immigrant/invasion will continue.


36 posted on 10/01/2016 4:02:01 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06
The mayor of a village in Germany had to be hospitalised after he was severely beaten in a suspected far-Right attack over his support for asylum-seekers

More better:
The known leftist mayor of a village in Germany had to be hospitalised after he was severely beaten in a German citizens' attack over his support for Islamic invaders.

37 posted on 10/01/2016 4:05:09 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Slug ‘er one fer me!


38 posted on 10/01/2016 4:05:52 PM PDT by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“There are worse things than civil war. Laying down and dying without a fight is one of them.”

That’s a fact.


39 posted on 10/01/2016 4:06:52 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

That’s one reason they want to disarm the very population they put at risk.

Hitler had some very eloquent anti-gun propaganda - and a secret desire that was very, very evil. So he went first to disarm the population.

Just stating that for the thread.


40 posted on 10/01/2016 4:07:00 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson