The Battleground Poll and Trump's Path to Victory

American Thinker ^ | September 9, 2016 | Bruce Walker

[HamiltonJay]

I really don’t see Hillary taking any Rust belt state beyond MN and IL...

Will Philly have fraud? sure.. but she has ZERO enthusiasm, she won’t get enough turnout and support even with the fraud in Philly to carry PA... Same with Detroit and MI.

She isn’t going to win OH or NC either....

There just isn’t a path for Hillary, the rust belt firewall is going to crumble and so is some of the new england states as well.

[Little Ray]

I welcome anyone who wants to vote against Hillary!, but I’d prefer it if they’d vote against Hillary for the only other candidate that actually has a chance of winning.

Heck, the Libertarian party isn’t even running libertarian candidates this year.

[maine-iac7]

fl

[thoughtomator]

sounds like a prescreening call

[SteveH]

for what? not commercial service since they asked for my party affiliation. maybe they wanted to check to see if i had recently updated my affiliation due to current events. that would make a little bit of sense. it could tell them which way the wind was blowing (?)

[Kaslin]

If they hadn't sat the 2006 elections out because they wanted to teach the GOP a lessen, the rats would not have taken over Congress and they would not have kept the Senate for eight years.

If they had not sat the 2008 and 2012 general elections out because they did not like the nominees. That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave would have not been elected, yet alone reelected

But I know I am preaching to the wall *sigh*

[Kaslin]

I don't answer calls on my cellphone from numbers I do not recognize. I have a specific ringtone and when that rings I don't answer. The exception was yesterday when someone reminded me of an appointment I had today, but it said who it was, so of course I answered.

I used to have a Landline and my phone had an audible Caller ID. So again if I did not recognize the number or the caller, I just did not answer the phone.

[AFPhys]

The big problem Trump has is that conservatives only really want to vote for a true conservative, preferably a conservative with an originalist view of the meaning of The Constitution. Most do not believe Trump fits into that category.

[jonno]

Yep - the “perfect” is the enemy of the “good” - which, outside of heaven is an extremely unrealistic expectation.

To “take ones ball and go home” because you “only” get 80% of what you want, is immature and or prideful, and WORSE, goes against (once again) the wisdom of the great Ronaldus Magnus:

http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-the-person-who-agrees-with-you-80-percent-of-the-time-is-a-friend-and-an-ally-not-a-ronald-reagan-51-92-72.jpg