Posted on 09/01/2016 1:40:05 PM PDT by Bratch
Many are beginning to attribute favorable opinion toward the campaign of Donald Trump and toward the campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway. However, those same voices may not fully grasp the scope of Wall Street’s Machiavellian architects.
Has anyone forgotten the term “Grubering”, or the intent behind Jonathan Gruber’s admissions of how to maneuver a legislative agenda (Obamacare) despite the will of the people?
Prudent caution is needed.
You only need to look as far as the latest Daron Shaw construct delivered by Fox News under the auspices of their latest Poll. Remember, there are trillions of dollars at stake; Wall Street has a very specific interest.
Pollster Daron Shaw’s history, and identifiable intent intent in 2016, is no different than Jonathan Gruber in 2010. Both are financed by the same entities.
The four republican sponsors and team members of the 2012 / 2013 Senate “Gang-of-Eight” comprehensive immigration reform bill:
McCain, Graham, Flake and Rubio.
First, about Ms. Kellyanne Conway – She worked on behalf of Mark Zuckerberg in 2014 to push the Senate gang-of-eight immigration bill through the House of Representatives with the full support of Paul Ryan, John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy and Eric Cantor. That agenda was/is clear and is not in dispute.
Kellyanne Conway = Comprehensive Immigration Reform, in all the various constructs you may assign to it. Conway and Rubio, together with Tom Donohue and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce were simpatico. There was no sunlight in their unified position.
Given the nature of this relationship, and given the historical advocacy, I simply cannot cast aside what was clearly a well established position, and grant some arbitrary benefit of doubt that Ms. Conway has suddenly just reversed over a decade of work, and changed her foundational immigration position. That acceptance -along with other GOPe associations- underlines my personal sense of caution toward Kellyanne Conway.
Now, lets look at the Fox Poll:
Enter Daron Shaw, paid to deliver a very specific construct. Paid to deliver very specific leverage toward the larger Wall Street agenda. How transparent is Shaw’s intent?
Inside Fox’s “Poll” you’ll find the following: Check out Question #17
Do you really think HALF of “Donald Trump’s supporters” would be MORE LIKELY to vote for him if he “softened his position on handling illegal immigrants living in the United States”?
Think intelligently.
Think practically.
What does that tell you about the rest of the polls content?
Yeah, disregard the top-line data (Trump/Clinton) because the construct is full of BS.
What you are reading is the presentation of an entity (Daron Shaw / Shaw Research) funded by Mr. Wall Street (Murdoch), and Mr Wall Street’s primary media entity – Fox News; which is specifically targeted toward the prior espoused ideology of Mrs. Conway (the same ideology of Zuckerberg, the GOPe, Clinton, the UniParty, and Rupert Murdoch).
Have we so quickly forgotten the scope of how corporate Wall Street interests engaged with (and used) “conservative” media only a few years ago. Reminder HERE and Reminder HERE And also this:
This latest poll is a continuance of all other recent “media polls”, albeit this one has a more specific internal agenda. There are trillions of dollars at stake. The behemoth that represents globalist/corporatist Wall Street, and their subsidiaries in the media, have a self-interest.
On its surface this ridiculous poll appears as nothing but propaganda intended toward a conversation with Ms. Conway telling Trump: see our national polling position is improving; you’re gaining ground on Hillary Clinton, and look… right here…. your position can improve even more if we just “soften” the campaign position on immigration.
See how that works?
Thankfully, Campaign CEO Steve Bannon is in a greater position of influence. When Conway was pitching the Go8 bill all over DC, Bannon was on the exact opposite side of that positioning.
Bratch, I’m not convinced these political campaign professionals actually have a “philosophy”, or even have to like the product they’re hired to sell.
These pols have a job to do and could be the same as many a schlub in sales, just out there competing to bring home the bacon.
I was never a huge fan of Conway, but if we just must feed paranoia, we can just as easily clutch pearls over Hispanics for TRUMP and Blacks for TRUMP can’t we?
Besides, I read Kelly Ann tried to get on TRUMP’s campaign first, before being picked up by Cruz’ campaign.
SPREAD THE WORD!
The Cheap Labor Express will not give up on preventing the citizens from reversing 30 years of bipartisan policy of non-enforcement of immigration laws.
Do you have any idea how much it costs to buy the GOP nomination 7 times?
>>I’m not convinced these political campaign professionals actually have a “philosophy”, or even have to like the product they’re hired to sell.
*******************************************************
So, it’s sort of like “Just another day at the office” mentality....like criminal defense attorneys who defend people they know to be guilty.
What a way to make a living, working for causes that may be opposite of one’s beliefs...not something a person of high moral integrity would do, I wouldn’t think. Hmmm.....
I think you’re probably right.
The opportunity to be the first woman to successfully run a winning Presidential campaign should “trump” any other motive. It will also provide incentive to ignore outside forces whispering in her ear.
We’ll see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
